Advertisement

European Journal of Ageing

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 91–102 | Cite as

The balance of intergenerational exchange: correlates of net transfers in Germany and Israel

  • Howard LitwinEmail author
  • Claudia Vogel
  • Harald Künemund
  • Martin Kohli
Original Investigation

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the net balance of transfers between persons aged 50 and older and their family, taking into account both the exchange of money and the exchange of practical assistance (time). Toward this end, a unique net balance outcome measure was computed by costing the value of time transfers into wage equivalents. The study made use of data from the first wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), and focused upon intergenerational exchange in two specific countries: Germany and Israel. The descriptive findings show that—up to an age of about 80 years—the elderly are net providers of help. The outcome variable was next regressed on a set of relevant predictors identified in the literature on intergenerational transfers and support—among them, sociodemographic background, health, social policy, social network and motivation variables. Holding these variables constant, the balance pattern by age remains valid: respondents aged 50–79 in both settings contributed to their family more than they received. These trends in net transfer exchanges were largely similar across both countries and across regions or population groups within both countries. Women were more likely to have a positive net exchange balance and poorer health was associated with net receiving. However, differences also emerged: social capital was more clearly associated with a positive exchange balance in Israel, transfer motivations shaped transfer behaviors in Germany but not in Israel, and socioeconomic variables seemed to work in opposite directions in the two countries. In sum, the results underscore the generally positive contribution of older people to intergenerational exchange in the family. This outcome holds for both Germany and Israel despite their very different conditions of context.

Keywords

Intergenerational exchange Time transfers Financial transfers 50+ Germany Israel SHARE 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the helpful and constructive comments of the Editor and the anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. Albertini M, Kohli M, Vogel C (2007) Intergenerational transfers of time and money in European families: common patterns—different regimes? J Eur Soc Policy 17(4):319–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Attias-Donfut C (1995) Transferts publics et transferts privés entre générations. In: Attias-Donfut C (ed) Les solidarités entre générations. Vieillesse, familles, État. Nathan, Paris, pp 5–23Google Scholar
  3. Attias-Donfut C, Ogg J, Wolff F-C (2005) European patterns of intergenerational financial and time transfers. Eur J Ageing 2:161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brenke K (2006) Wachsender Niedriglohnsektor in Deutschland—sind Mindestlöhne sinnvoll? Wochenbericht des DIW Berlin 73(15–16):197–205Google Scholar
  5. Burgess EW (1960) Aging in Western culture. In: Burgess EW (ed) Aging in Western societies. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 3–28Google Scholar
  6. Central Bureau of Statistics (2007) Statistical abstract of Israel—no. 58. JerusalemGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox D, Rank MR (1992) Inter-vivos transfers and intergenerational exchange. Rev Econ Stat 74(2):305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cremer H, Kessler D, Pestieau P (1992) Intergenerational transfers within the family. Eur Econ Rev 36(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Esping-Andersen G (1999) Social foundations of post-industrial economies. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Furstenberg FF, Hoffman SD, Shrestha L (1995) The effect of divorce on intergenerational transfers—new evidence. Demography 32(3):319–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grundy E (2005) Reciprocity in relationships: Socio-economic and health influences on intergenerational exchanges between third age parents and their adult children in Great Britain. Br J Sociol 56(2):233–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Henretta JC, Hill MS, Li W, Soldo BJ, Wolf DA (1997) Selection of children to provide care: The effect of earlier parental transfers. J Gerontol Soc Sci 52(special issue):110–119Google Scholar
  13. Hogan DP, Eggebeen DJ, Clogg CC (1993) The structure of intergenerational exchanges in American families. Am J Sociol 98(6):1428–1458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kalaycioglu S, Rittersberger-Tilic H (2000) Intergenerational solidarity networks of instrumental and cultural transfers within migrant families in Turkey. Ageing Soc 20:523–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Klevmarken A, Hesselius P, Swensson B (2005) The SHARE sampling procedures and calibrated design weights. In: Börsch-Supan A, Jürges H (eds) The survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe. Methodology. Research Institute for the Economics of Aging, Mannheim, pp 28–69Google Scholar
  16. Kohli M (2004) Intergenerational transfers and inheritance: A comparative view. In: Silverstein M (ed) Intergenerational relations across time and place, vol 24. Springer, New York, pp 266–289Google Scholar
  17. Kohli M (1999) Private and public transfers between generations: Linking the family and the state. Eur Soc 1(1):81–104Google Scholar
  18. Kohli M, Albertini M (2007) The generational contract in the family: explaining regime differences in financial transfers from parents to children in Europe (DemoSoc Working Paper No. 2007-24). Universitat Pompeu Fabra, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  19. Kohli M, Künemund H (2003) Intergenerational transfers in the family: What motivates giving? In: Bengtson VL, Lowenstein A (eds) Global aging and challenges to families. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp 123–142Google Scholar
  20. Kohli M, Künemund H, Litwin H, Lux T, Shiovitz-Ezra S, Vogel C (2007) The sociology of familial exchange in later life: a comparative German-Israeli study of the determinants of intergenerational transfers. (Research report for the German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development). Free University, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  21. Kohli M, Künemund H, Motel A, Szydlik M (2000) Families apart? Intergenerational transfers in East and West Germany. In: Arber S, Attias-Donfut C (eds) The myth of generational conflict: the family and state in ageing societies. Routledge, London, pp 88–99Google Scholar
  22. Künemund H, Motel M (2000) Verbreitung, Motivation und Entwicklungsperspektiven privater intergenerationeller Hilfeleistungen und Transfers. In: Kohli M, Szydlik M (eds) Generationen in Familie und Gesellschaft. Leske + Budrich, Opladen, pp 122–137Google Scholar
  23. Künemund H, Motel-Klingebiel A, Kohli M (2005) Do intergenerational transfers from elderly parents increase social inequality among their middle-aged children? Evidence from the German Aging Survey. J Gerontol Soc Sci 60(1):S30–S36Google Scholar
  24. Künemund H, Rein M (1999) There is more to receiving than needing: theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out. Ageing Soc 19:93–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kurz K (2004) Labour market position, intergenerational transfers and home-ownership: a longitudinal analysis for West German birth cohorts. Eur Sociol Rev 20(2):141–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lillard LA, Willis RJ (1997) Motives for intergenerational transfers: evidence from Malaysia. Demography 34(1):115–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Litwin H (ed) (1996) The social networks of older people: a cross-national analysis. Praeger, WesportGoogle Scholar
  28. Lowenstein A, Daatland SO (2006) Filial norms and family support in a comparative cross-national context: evidence from the OASIS study. Ageing Soc 26:203–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lowenstein A, Ogg J (eds) (2003) OASIS—old age and autonomy: the role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity. Final report. Haifa University (Ms.), HaifaGoogle Scholar
  30. McGarry K (1999) Inter vivos transfers and intended bequests. J Public Econ 73(3):321–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McGarry K, Schoeni RF (1995) Transfer behavior in the Health and Retirement Study: Measurement and the redistribution of resources within the family. J Hum Resour 30(suppl):184–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Motel A, Szydlik M (1999) Private intergenerational transfers. Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie 28(1):3–22Google Scholar
  33. Pezzin LE, Schone BS (1999) Parental marital disruption and intergenerational transfers: An analysis of lone elderly parents and their children. Demography 36(3):287–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raijman R, Semyonov M (1997) Gender, ethnicity and immigration: Double disadvantage and triple disadvantage among recent immigrant women in the Israeli labor market. Gender Soc 11(1):108–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reil-Held A (2006) Crowding out or crowding in? Public and private transfers in Germany. Eur J Popul 22:263–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schokkaert E (2006) The empirical analysis of transfer motives. In: Kolm S-C, Mercier Ythier J (eds) Handbook of the economics of giving, reciprocity and altruism, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 127–181Google Scholar
  37. Silverstein M, Conroy SJ, Wang HT, Giarrusso R, Bengtson VL (2002) Reciprocity in parent–child relations over the adult life course. J Gerontol Ser Soc Sci 57(1):S3–S13Google Scholar
  38. Silverstein M, Parrott TM, Bengtson VL (1995) Factors that predispose middle-aged sons and daughters to provide social support to older parents. J Marriage Fam 57(2):465–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Howard Litwin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Claudia Vogel
    • 2
  • Harald Künemund
    • 2
  • Martin Kohli
    • 3
  1. 1.Israel Gerontological Data CenterThe Hebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Institute of Gerontology and Centre for Ageing and SocietyUniversity of VechtaVechtaGermany
  3. 3.Department of Social and Political SciencesEuropean University InstituteSan Domenico di FiesoleItaly

Personalised recommendations