Advertisement

European Journal of Ageing

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 123–136 | Cite as

Lay perceptions of successful ageing: findings from a national survey of middle aged and older adults in Britain

  • Ann BowlingEmail author
Original Investigation

Abstract

The main aim of the research presented here was to identify perceptions of successful ageing among people in middle and older age groups. The method was a British population survey of 854 community-dwelling men and women aged 50 or more. Just over three-quarters of respondents rated themselves as ageing successfully (“very well” or “well”). Respondents’ definitions of successful ageing, and the reasons given for their self-ratings, based on open-ended questioning, illustrated the multidimensionality of the concept. Definitions varied with respondents’ characteristics. Self-rated health status and quality of life consistently retained significance in the multivariate models of predictors of self-rated successful ageing, while self-rated quality of life made the greatest contribution to the models. Reporting a longstanding, limiting illness was not significant. The overall models explained about a third of the variation in self-rated successful aging. Lay definitions of successful ageing were multidimensional. A biomedical perspective of successful ageing therefore needs balancing with a psycho-social perspective, and vice versa. This is particularly relevant for biomedical approaches which have largely ignored the rich tradition of social and psychological research on this topic. Self-rated successful ageing should be included in measuring instruments to enhance social relevance. This research, with the use of open-ended questioning, makes a novel methodological contribution to the literature, is unique in questioning middle aged as well as older people, and provides a British perspective on a largely US and German topic.

Keywords

Successful ageing Ageing Quality of life Health status 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the ONS Omnibus Survey staff and interviewers, in particular Sandra Short and Ian O’Sullivan for their much appreciated advice and help with designing the module, managing the survey, overseeing the coding and open coding, and processing the data. We are also grateful to the respondents themselves. Those who carried out the original analysis and collection of the data hold no responsibility for the further analysis and interpretation of them. Material from the ONS Omnibus Survey, made available through ONS, has been used with the permission of the Controller of The Stationary Office. The dataset is held on the data archive at the University of Essex. Conflict of interest: none. No financial interests. Ethical committee consent: the survey module was approved by the Office for National Statistics, Omnibus Survey Ethical Committee. Respondents gave their informed verbal consent to participate in the survey after written information had been given to them, in accordance with current ethical guidelines governing national surveys in Britain.

References

  1. Baltes PB, Baltes MM (eds) (1990) Successful aging. Perspectives from the behavioral sciences. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergstrom MJ, Holmes E (2000) Lay theories of successful aging after the death of a spouse: a network text analysis of bereavement advice. Health Commun 12:377–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkman LF, Seeman TE, Albert M et al (1993) High, usual and impaired functioning in community-dwelling older men and women: findings from the MacArthur Foundation Network on Successful Ageing. J Clin Epidemiol 40:1129–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowling A (2005a). Ageing well. Quality of life in old age. Open University Press, MaidenheadGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowling A (2005b) Just one question: if one question works why ask several? J Epidemiol Commun Health 59:342–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowling A (2006). Systematic review of the constituents of successful ageing. Int J Aging Hum Dev (in press)Google Scholar
  7. Bowling A, Dieppe P (2005) What is successful ageing and who should define it? Br Med J 331:1548–1551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowling A, Gabriel Z (2004) An integrational model of quality of life in older age. A comparison of analytic and lay models of quality of life. Soc Indic Res 69:1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowling A, Gabriel Z, Dykes J, Marriott-Dowding L, Fleissig A, Evans O, Banister D, Sutton S (2003) Let’s ask them: a national survey of definitions of quality of life and its enhancement among people aged 65 and over. Int J Aging Hum Dev 56:269–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bretsky P, Guralnik JM, Launer L et al (2003) The role of APOE-epsilon4 in longitudinal cognitive decline: MacArthur studies of successful ageing. Neurology 60:1077–1081Google Scholar
  11. Butler RN (1974) Successful ageing and the role of the life review. J Am Geriatr Soc 22:529–535Google Scholar
  12. Charbonneau-Lyons DL, Mosher-Ashley PM, Stanford-Pollock M (2002) Opinions of college students and independent-living adults regarding successful aging. Educ Gerontol 28:823–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark F, Carlson M, Zemke R et al (1996) Life domains and adaptive strategies of a group of low-income, well older workers. Am J Occup Ther 50:99–108Google Scholar
  14. Day AT (1991) Remarkable survivors. Insights into successful aging among women. Urban Institute Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher BJ (1992) Successful aging and life satisfaction: a pilot study for conceptual clarification. J Aging Stud 6:191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher BJ (1995). Successful aging: life satisfaction and generativity in later life. Int J Aging Hum Dev 41:239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher BJ, Specht DK (1999) Successful aging and creativity in later life. J Aging Stud 13:457–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fozard JL, Popkin SJ (1978) Optimising adult development: and means of an applied psychology of ageing. Am Psychol 33:975–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glass TA (2003) Assessing the success of successful aging. Ann Intern Med 139(Suppl. 1):382Google Scholar
  20. Glass TA, Seeman TE, Herzog AR, Kahn R, Berkman LF (1995) Change in productive activity in late adulthood. Macarthur studies of successful aging. J Gerontol 50B:S65–S76Google Scholar
  21. Goldstein MS, Siegel JM, Boyer R (1984) Predicting changes in perceived health status. Am J Public Health 74:611–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goldthorpe JH (‘with C Llewellyn’) (1980) Social mobility and class structure in modern Britain. Oxford, ClarendonGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldthorpe JH (1997) The ‘Goldthorpe’ class schema: some observations on conceptual and operational issues in relation to the ESRC review of government social classifications. In: Rose D, O’Reilly K (eds) Constructing classes: towards a new social classification for the UK. Economic and Social Research Council/Office for National Statistics, SwindonGoogle Scholar
  24. Greiner PA, Snowdon DA, Greiner LH (1999) Self-rated function, self-rated health, and postmortem evidence of brain infarcts: findings from the Nun study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 54:S219–S222Google Scholar
  25. Guse LW, Masesar MA (1999) Quality of life and successful aging in long-term care: perceptions of residents. Issues Ment Health Nurs 20:527–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Havighurst RJ (1957) The social competence of middle-aged people. Genet Psychol Monogr 56:297–375Google Scholar
  27. Havighurst RJ (1961) Successful ageing. Gerontologist 1:8–13Google Scholar
  28. Herzog AR, House JG (1991) Productive activities and aging well. Generations 15:49–54Google Scholar
  29. Idler EI, Kasl SV (1995) Self-ratings of health: do they also predict change in functional ability? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 50:S344–S353Google Scholar
  30. Kaplan GA, Camacho T (1983) Perceived health and mortality: a nine-year follow-up of the human population laboratory cohort. Am J Epidemiol 117:292–298Google Scholar
  31. Katz MH (1999) Multivariable analysis. A practical guide for clinicians. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Knight T, Ricciardelli LA (2003) Successful aging: perceptions of adults aged between 70 and 101 years. Int J Ageing Hum Dev 56:223–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kubzansky LD, Berkman LF, Glass TA, Seeman TE (1998) Is educational attainment associated with shared determinants of health in the elderly? Findings from the MacArthur studies of successful aging. Psychosom Med 60:578–585Google Scholar
  34. Lawton G (1946) Aging successfully. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Manor O, Matthews S, Power C (2001) Self-rated health and limiting longstanding illness: inter-relationships with morbidity in early adulthood. Int J Epidemiol 30:600–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marmot M, Banks J, Blundell R, Lessof C, Nazroo J (eds) (2003) Health, wealth and lifestyles of the older population in England. The 2002 English longitudinal study of ageing. Institute of Fiscal Studies, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Menec VH (2003) The relation between everyday activities and successful aging: a 6-year longitudinal study. J Gerontol 58B:S74–S82Google Scholar
  38. Moen P, Dempster-McClain D, Williams RM (1992) Successful aging: a life course perspective on women’s multiple roles and health. Am J Sociol 97:1612–1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Palmore E (1979) Predictors of successful aging. Gerontologist 19:427–431Google Scholar
  40. Phelan EA, Larson EB (2002) “Successful aging”—where next? J Am Geriatr Soc 50:1306–1308Google Scholar
  41. Phelan EA, Anderson LA, Lacroix AZ, Larson EB (2004). Older adults’ views of “successful aging”—how do they compare with researchers’ definitions? J Am Geriatr Soc 52:211–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reuben DB, Judd-Hamilton L, Harris TB, Seeman TE (2003) The associations between physical activity and inflammatory markers in high-functioning older persons: MacArthur studies of successful aging. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rowe JW, Kahn RL (1987) Human aging: usual and successful. Science 23:143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rowe JW, Kahn RL (1998) Successful aging. Pantheon Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Rupp C, Duffy EL, Danish MM (1967) Successful adaptation to aging. I. Psychologic, social and psychiatric aspects. J Am Geriatr Soc 15:1137–1143Google Scholar
  46. Ryff CD (1982) Successful aging: a developmental approach. Gerontologist 22:209–214Google Scholar
  47. Sarkisian CA, Hays RD, Mangione CM (2002) Do older adults expect to age successfully? The associations between expectations regarding aging and beliefs regarding healthcare seeking among older adults. J Am Geriatr Assoc 50:1837–1843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schoenfeld DE, Malmrose LC, Blazer DG et al (1994) Self-rated health and mortality in the high-functioning elderly. A closer look at healthy individuals: MacArthur field study of successful aging. J Gerontol 49:M109–M115Google Scholar
  49. Seeman TE, Berkman LF, Charpentier PA et al (1995) Behavioral and psychosocial predictors of physical performance: MacArthur studies of successful aging. J Gerontol 50A:M177–M183Google Scholar
  50. Seeman TE, Bruce ML, McAvay GJ (1996a) Social network characteristics and onset of ADL disability: MacArthur studies of successful aging. J Gerontol 51B:S191–S200Google Scholar
  51. Seeman TE, Charpentier PA, Berkman LF et al (1994) Predicting changes in physical performance in a high-functioning elderly cohort. MacArthur studies of successful aging. J Gerontol 49:M97–M108Google Scholar
  52. Seeman TE, Lusignolo TM, Albert M, Berkman L (2001) Social relationships, social support, and patterns of cognitive aging in healthy, high functioning older adults: MacArthur studies of successful ageing. Health Psychol 20:243–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Seeman T, McAvay G, Merrill S et al (1996b) Self-efficacy beliefs and change in cognitive performance: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Psychol Aging 11:538–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Seeman TE, Unger JB, McAvay G, Mendes de Leon CF (1999) Self-efficacy beliefs and perceived declines in functional ability. MacArthur studies of successful aging. J Gerontol 54B:214–222Google Scholar
  55. Starr JM, Deary IJ, Macintyre S (2003) Associations with successful aging in the ‘healthy Old People in Edinburgh’ cohort: being well, fit and healthy. Aging Clin Exp Res 15:336–342Google Scholar
  56. Strawbridge WJ, Wallhagen MI, Cohen RD (2002) Successful aging and well-being. Self-rated compared with Rowe and Kahn. Gerontologist 42:727–733Google Scholar
  57. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2001) Using multivariate statistics, 4th edn. Allyn and Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  58. Tabbarah M, Crimmins EM, Seeman TE (2002) The relationship between cognitive and physical performance. MacArthur studies of successful aging. J Gerontol 57A:M228–M235Google Scholar
  59. Tate RB, Lah L, Cuddy TE (2003) Definition of successful aging by elderly Canadian males: the Manitoba follow-up study. Gerontologist 43:735–744Google Scholar
  60. Unger JB, McAvay G, Bruce ML et al (1999) Variation in the importance of social network characteristics on physical functioning in elderly persons: MacArthur studies on successful aging. J Gerontol 54B:S245–S251Google Scholar
  61. Vaillant GE, Mukamal K (2001) Successful aging. Am J Psychiatr 158:839–847Google Scholar
  62. Von Faber M, Bootsma-van der Weil A, van Exel E et al (2001) Successful aging in the oldest old: who can be characterised as successfully aged? Arch Intern Med 161:2694–2700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B (1993) SF-36 health survey. New England Medical Centre, BostonGoogle Scholar
  64. Williams RH, Wirths CG (1965) Lives through the years: styles of life and successful aging. Atherton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  65. Wong PT (1989) Personal meaning and successful aging? Can Psychol 30:3516–3253Google Scholar
  66. Wong PT, Watt LM (1991) What types of reminiscence are associated with successful aging? Psychol Aging 6:272–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Primary Care and Population SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations