European Journal of Ageing

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 67–73 | Cite as

Social productivity and well-being of older people: baseline results from the SHARE study

  • Morten Wahrendorf
  • Olaf von dem Knesebeck
  • Johannes Siegrist
Original Investigation

Abstract

Social and productive activities have been associated with more favorable well-being and health outcomes in older populations. There is limited consensus on what aspects account for the observed effect and what pathways may underlie their associations. Using data from the 2004 ‘Survey of Health Aging and Retirement in Europe’ (SHARE), based on some 22,000 participants aged 50 and older from ten European countries, this study explores types and quality of productive activities (voluntary work, care for a person, informal help) and its association with two indicators of well-being (depressive symptoms, quality of life). Quality of social productivity is analyzed in the frame of a sociological model based on the notion of exchange reciprocity. Results of multivariate linear regression analysis, adjusted for important confounders, confirm an association of productive activity with well-being. However, this association varies according to experienced quality of exchange: Experienced reciprocity between efforts spent and rewards received is associated with positive well-being (with the exception of caring), while non-reciprocal exchange (high effort and low reward) is associated with negative well-being in all activities. Findings underline the need to improve quality of exchange in socially productive activities as a means of motivating older people to participate in societal life.

Keywords

Social productivity Well-being Depressive symptoms Quality of life Effort–reward imbalance 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to the members of the working group on social productivity and well-being in the SHARE research team, in particular David Blane, Andrew Clark, Martin Hyde, Hendrik Jürges, Alexandra Kupfer, Michael Marmot, James Nazroo, and Frank Pühlhofer. This research has been funded through the 5th framework programme under the project name of AMANDA (“Advanced Multidisciplinary Analysis of New Data on Ageing”, QLK6-CT-2002-002426). The SHARE data collection has been primarily funded by the European Commission through the 5th framework programme (project QLK6-CT-2001-00360 in the thematic programme Quality of Life programme area). Additional funding came from the US National Institute on Ageing (U01 AG09740-13S2, P01 AG005842, P01 AG08291, P30 AG12815, Y1-AG- 4553-01 and OGHA 04-064). Data collection in Austria (through the Austrian Science Foundation, FWF), Belgium (through the Belgian Science Policy Administration), and Switzerland (through BBW/OFES/UFES) was nationally funded. The SHARE data set is introduced in Börsch-Supan et al. (2005); methodological details are contained in Börsch-Supan and Jürges (2005).

References

  1. Bath PA, Deeg D (2005) Social engagement and health outcomes among older people: introduction to a special section. Eur J Ageing 2:24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Börsch-Supan A, Jürges H (2005) The survey of health, aging and retirement in Europe—methodology. Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Ageing, MannheimGoogle Scholar
  3. Börsch-Supan A, Mariuzzo F (2005) Our sample: 50+ in Europe. In: Börsch-Supan A, Brugiavini A, Jürges H, Mackenbach J, Siegrist J, Weber G (eds) Health, ageing and retirement in Europe. First results from the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe. Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Ageing, Mannheim, pp 30–34Google Scholar
  4. Börsch-Supan A, Brugiavini A, Jürges H, Mackenbach J, Siegrist J, Weber G (2005) Health, ageing and retirement in Europe. First results from the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe. Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Ageing, MannheimGoogle Scholar
  5. Brugiavini A, Croda E, Paccagnella O, Rainato R, Weber G (2005) Generated income variables in SHARE release 1. In: Börsch-Supan A, Jürges H (eds) The survey of health, aging and retirement in Europe—methodology. Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Ageing, MannheimGoogle Scholar
  6. Commission of the European Communities (2005) Green Paper “Confronting demographic change: a new solidarity between the generations”. COM, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  7. Dewey ME, Prince MJ (2005) Mental health. In: Börsch-Supan A, Brugiavini A, Jürges H, Mackenbach J, Siegrist J, Weber G (eds) Health, ageing and retirement in Europe. First results from the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe. Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Ageing, Mannheim, pp 108–117Google Scholar
  8. Glass TA, Mendes de Leon C, Marottoli RA, Berkman LF (1999) Population based study of social and productive activities as predictors of survival among elderly Americans. Br Med J 319:478–483Google Scholar
  9. Henry JP (1991) Biological basis of the stress response. Integr Physiol Behav Sci 27:66–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Herzog AR, Franks MM, Markus HR, Holmberg D (1998) Activities and well-being in older age: effects of self-concept and educational attainment. Psychol Aging 13:179–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik JHP, Wolf C (2004) Advances in cross-national comparison: a European working book for demographic and socio-economic variables. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Hyde M, Wiggins RD, Higgs P, Blane DB (2003) A measure of quality of life in early old age: the theory, development and properties of a needs satisfaction model (CASP-19). Aging Ment Health 7:186–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Idler EL, Benyamini Y (1997) Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav 38:21–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Irwin M, Artin KH, Oxman MN (1999) Screening for depression in the older adult: criterion validity of the 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Arch Intern Med 159:1701–1704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Klevmarken A, Swensson B, Hesselius P (2005) The SHARE sampling procedures and calibrated design weights. In: Börsch-Supan A, Jürges H (eds) The survey of health, aging and retirement in Europe—methodology. Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Ageing, MannheimGoogle Scholar
  16. Klumb PL, Maier H (2002) Daily activities and survival at older ages. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research Working Paper WP 2002–041Google Scholar
  17. Knesebeck Ovd, Siegrist J (2003) Reported nonreciprocity of social exchange and depressive symptoms. Extending the model of effort-reward imbalance beyond work. J Psychosom Res 55:209–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Knesebeck Ovd, Hyde M, Higgs P, Kupfer A, Siegrist J (2005) Quality of life and well-being. In: Börsch-Supan A, Brugiavini A, Jürges H, Mackenbach J, Siegrist J, Weber G (eds) Health, ageing and retirement in Europe. First results from the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe. Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Ageing, Mannheim, pp 199–203Google Scholar
  19. Lee S, Colditz GA, Berkman LF, Kawachi I (2003) Caregiving and risk of coronary heart disease in U.S. women: a prospective study. Am J Prev Med 24:113–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Long JS, Freese J (2003) Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata, Revised edition. Stata Press, College StationGoogle Scholar
  21. Maier H, Klumb PL (2005) Social participation and survival at older ages: is the effect driven by activity content or context? Eur J Ageing 2:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mendes de Leon CF, Glass TA, Berkman LF (2003) Social engagement and disability in a community population of older adults: The new haven EPESE. Am J Epidemiol 157:633–642CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Menec VH (2003) The relation between everyday activities and successful aging: a 6-year longitudinal study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 58:74–82Google Scholar
  24. Musick MA, Herzog AR, House JS (1999) Volunteering and mortality among older adults: findings from a national sample. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 54:173–180Google Scholar
  25. Paccagnella O, Weber G (2005) Income imputation. In: Börsch-Supan A, Brugiavini A, Jürges H, Mackenbach J, Siegrist J, Weber G (eds) Health, ageing and retirement in Europe. First results from the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe. Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Ageing, Mannheim, pp 357–358Google Scholar
  26. Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale: a self report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psych Meas 1:385–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Redelmeier DA, Singh SM (2001) Survival in Academy Award—winning actors and actresses. Ann Intern Med 134:955–962PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rogers WH (1993) Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Tech Bull 13:19–23Google Scholar
  29. Ryff CD, Singer B (1998) The contours of positive human health. Psychol Inq 9:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schulz R, Beach SR (1999) Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study. J Am Med Assoc 282:2215–2219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague PR (1997) A neural substrates of prediction and reward. Science 275:1593–1599CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Siegrist J (1996) Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1:27–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Siegrist J (2005) Social reciprocity and health: new scientific evidence and policy implications. Psychoneuroendocrinology 30:1033–1038CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Siegrist J, Knesebeck Ovd, Pollack CE (2004) Social productivity and well-being of older people: a sociological exploration. Soc Theory Health 2:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tsutsumi A, Kawakami N (2004) A review of empirical studies on the model of effort-reward imbalance at work: reducing occupational stress by implementing a new theory. Soc Sci Med 59:2335–2359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. van Wijk CMTG, Kolk AM (1997) Sex differences in physical symptoms: The contribution of symptom perception theory. Soc Sci Med 45:231–246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. van Willigen M (2000) Differential benefits of volunteering across the life course. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 55:308–318Google Scholar
  38. White H (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48:817–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morten Wahrendorf
    • 1
  • Olaf von dem Knesebeck
    • 2
  • Johannes Siegrist
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medical SociologyUniversity of DuesseldorfDuesseldorfGermany
  2. 2.Department of Medical SociologyUniversity of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations