Advertisement

European Journal of Ageing

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 22–33 | Cite as

Are public care and services for older people targeted according to need? Applying the Behavioural Model on longitudinal data of a Swedish urban older population

  • Kristina Larsson
  • Mats Thorslund
  • Ingemar Kåreholt
Original Investigation

Abstract

The objectives were to identify factors that predict the use of home help services and transition into institutional care and to study to what extent care services were targeted according to the individuals’ needs. A further objective was to study whether people who had moved into institutional care facilities had received home help prior to institutionalisation. A community-dwelling sample (n=502) aged 81–100 was twice interviewed and assessed with medical examinations. Their use of public elderly care between 1994/1996 and 2000 was studied using survival analyses. Need factors, according to the Andersen Behavioural Model, were the most important predictors for the use of elderly care. Among people living alone, dementia, functional limitations, and depressive symptoms predicted the use of home help services and institutionalisation. Among non-demented cohabiting people, depressive symptoms and dependence in ADLs increased the likelihood of both home help and institutionalisation. Among cohabiting people with dementia, the effect of dementia was difficult to separate from the effects of ADL limitations and depression. Enabling factors were of importance among cohabiting people. A high level of education increased the likelihood of moving into institutional care, and informal extra-residential care increased the likelihood of both outcomes indicating that elderly care resources had not been targeted solely according to need. Predisposing factors such as age and gender were of importance only among people living alone. Basically the same factors predicted both the receipt of home help and institutionalisation. Only 4% of people living alone and 5% of those cohabiting moved to institutions without previously receiving home help.

Keywords

Home- and community-based services Elderly care Dementia Depression The Andersen Behavioural Model 

References

  1. Aguero-Torres H, von Strauss E, Viitanen M, Winblad B, Fratiglioni L (2001) Institutionalization in the elderly: the role of chronic diseases and dementia. Cross-sectional and longitudinal data from a population-based study. J Clin Epidemiol 54(8):795–801CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen RM (1995) Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?. J Health Soc Behav 36(1):1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen R, Newman JF (1973) Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 51(1):95–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. APA (1987) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd edn, revised (DSM-III-R). American Psychiatric Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. APA (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn, revised (DSM-IV-TR). American Psychiatric Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. Asberg M, Montgomery SA, Perris C, Schalling D, Sedvall G (1978) A comprehensive psychopathological rating scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 271:5–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrett AE, Lynch SM (1999) Caregiving networks of elderly persons: variation by marital status. Gerontologist 39(6):695–704PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Beekman AT, Deeg DJ, Braam AW, Smit JH, Van Tilburg W (1997) Consequences of major and minor depression in later life: a study of disability, well-being and service utilization. Psychol Med 27(6):1397–1409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calsyn RJ, Winter JP (2000) Predicting different types of service use by the elderly: the strength of the behavioral model and value of interaction terms. J Appl Gerontol 19(3):284–303Google Scholar
  10. Crowell SJ, Rockwood K, Stolee P, Buehler SK, James BM, Kozma A et al (1996) Use of home care services among the elderly in eastern Canada. Can J Aging 15(3):413–426Google Scholar
  11. Daatland SO (ed) (1997) De siste årene. Eldreomsorgen i Scandinavia 1960–95 [The last years. Public elder care in Scandinavia 1960–95], vol 22/97. NOVA, OsloGoogle Scholar
  12. Daatland SO, Herlofson K (2003) ‘Lost solidarity’ or ‘changed solidarity’: a comparative European view of normative family solidarity. Ageing Soc 23:537–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunkin JJ, Anderson-Hanley C (1998) Dementia caregiver burden: a review of the literature and guidelines for assessment and intervention. Neurology 51(1 Suppl 1):S53–S60, discussion S65–S57Google Scholar
  14. Esping-Andersen G (1990) The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Esping-Andersen G (1999) Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Fratiglioni L, Viitanen M, Bäckman L, Sandman PO, Winblad B (1992) Occurrence of dementia in advanced age: the study design of the Kungsholmen project. Neuroepidemiology 11(Suppl 1):29–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fratiglioni L, Viitanen M, von Strauss E, Tontodonati V, Herlitz A, Winblad B (1997) Very old women at highest risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: incidence data from the Kungsholmen Project, Stockholm. Neurology 48(1):132–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Freedman VA (1996) Family structure and the risk of nursing home admission. J Gerontol 51(2):S61–S69Google Scholar
  19. Gaugler JE, Kane RL, Kane RA, Clay T, Newcomer R (2003) Caregiving and institutionalization of cognitively impaired older people: utilizing dynamic predictors of change. Gerontologist 43(2):219–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gill CE, Hinrichsen GA, DiGiuseppe R (1998) Factors associated with formal service use by family members of patients with dementia. J Appl Gerontol 17(1):38–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Government Bill (1997/98:113) Nationell handlingsplan för äldrepolitiken [National action program for policies of the elderly]Google Scholar
  22. Hawranik P (2002) Inhome service use by caregivers and their elders: does cognitive status make a difference? Can J Aging 21(2):257–271Google Scholar
  23. Jette AM, Tennstedt S, Crawford S (1995) How does formal and informal community care affect nursing home use? J Gerontol 50(1):S4–S12Google Scholar
  24. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW (1963) Studies of illness in the aged the index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. J Am Med Assoc 185:914–919Google Scholar
  25. Langa KM, Chernew ME, Kabeto MU, Katz SJ (2001) The explosion in paid home health care in the 1990s: who received the additional services? Med Care 39(2):147–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Larsson K, Silverstein M (2004) The effects of marital and parental status on informal support and service utilization: a study of older Swedes living alone. J Aging Stud 18(2):231–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Larsson K, Thorslund M (2002) Does gender matter? Differences in patterns of informal support and formal services in a Swedish urban elderly population. Res Aging 24(3):308–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Larsson K, Thorslund M, Forsell Y (2004) Dementia and depressive symptoms as predictors of home help utilization among the oldest old: population-based study in an urban area of Sweden. J Aging Health 16(5):641–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lilja M, Månsson I, Jahlenius L, Sacco-Peterson M (2003) Disability policies in Sweden. J Disabil Policy Stud 14(3):130–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Linden M, Horgas AL, Gilberg R, Steinhagen-Thiessen E (1999) The utilization of medical and nursing care in old age. In: Baltes PB, Mayer KU (eds) The Berlin Aging Study. Aging from 70 to 100. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 430–449Google Scholar
  31. Lingsom S (1997) The substitution issue. Care policies and their consequences for family care (Nova-report no. 6). Norwegian Social Research, OsloGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu K, Manton KG, Aragon C (2000) Changes in home care use by disabled elderly persons: 1982–1994. J Gerontol 55(4):S245–S253Google Scholar
  33. Miller EA, Weissert WG (2000) Predicting elderly people’s risk for nursing home placement, hospitalization, functional impairment, and mortality: a synthesis. Med Care Res Rev 57(3):259–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs (1999) Bo tryggt—betala rätt [Live safely—pay right]. Government Commission Report 1999:33, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  35. National Board of Health and Welfare (1996) Vård och omsorg om äldre personer och personer med funktionshinder 1995 [Service and care to elderly and disabled persons 1995] 1996:7, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  36. National Board of Health and Welfare (2001) Äldre—vård och omsorg år 2000. [Elderly people—care and services in 2000] 2001:3, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  37. Palme J, Bergmark A, Backman O, Estrada F, Fritzell J, Lundberg O et al (2003) A welfare balance sheet for the 1990s. Final report of the Swedish Welfare Commission. Scand J Public Health Suppl 60:7–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pearlman DN, Crown WH (1992) Alternative sources of social support and their impacts on institutional risk. Gerontologist 32(4):527–535PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Penning MJ (1995) Cognitive impairment, caregiver burden, and the utilization of home health services. J Aging Health 7(2):233–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Portrait F, Lindeboom M, Deeg D (2000) The use of long-term care services by the Dutch elderly. Health Econ 9(6):513–531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Romøren TI (2003) Last years of long lives: the Larvik study. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Sakari-Rantala R, Heikkinen E, Ruoppila I (1995) Difficulties in mobility among elderly people and their association with socioeconomic factors, dwelling environment and use of services. Aging 7(6):433–440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Shapiro E, Tate RB (1997) The use and cost of community care services by elders with unimpaired cognitive function, with cognitive impairment/no dementia and with dementia. Can J Aging 16(4):665–681Google Scholar
  44. Shea D, Davey A, Femia EE, Zarit SH, Sundstrom G, Berg S et al (2003) Exploring assistance in Sweden and the United States. Gerontologist 43(5):712–721PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sipilä J (ed) (1997) Social Care Services: the key to the Scandinavian Welfare Model. Ashgate, AveburyGoogle Scholar
  46. St John PD, Montgomery PR, Kristjansson B, McDowell I (2002) Cognitive scores, even within the normal range, predict death and institutionalization. Age Ageing 31(5):373–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. von Strauss E, Viitanen M, De Ronchi D, Winblad B, Fratiglioni L (1999) Aging and the occurrence of dementia: findings from a population-based cohort with a large sample of nonagenarians. Arch Neurol 56(5):587–592CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Szebehely M (1998) Changing divisions of carework: caring for children and frail elderly people in Sweden. In: Lewis J (eds) Gender, social care and welfare state restructuring in Europe. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 257–283Google Scholar
  49. Thorslund M (2003) Äldre som flyttar till service och vård. Uppföljning av situationen i Sundsvall 2002 [Elderly people moving to service and care facilities. A follow-up study in Sundsvall in 2002], StockholmGoogle Scholar
  50. Thorslund M, Norström T, Wernberg K (1991) The utilization of home help in Sweden: a multivariate analysis. Gerontologist 31(1):116–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Toseland RW, McCallion P, Gerber T, Banks S (2002) Predictors of health and human services use by persons with dementia and their family caregivers. Soc Sci Med 55(7):1255–1266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Yaffe K, Fox P, Newcomer R, Sands L, Lindquist K, Dane K et al (2002) Patient and caregiver characteristics and nursing home placement in patients with dementia. JAMA 287(16):2090–2097CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristina Larsson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mats Thorslund
    • 1
  • Ingemar Kåreholt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social WorkStockholm University/Aging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet/Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Stockholm Gerontology Research CenterStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations