Advertisement

European Journal of Ageing

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 64–66 | Cite as

Social engagement and successful aging

  • Carlos F. Mendes de Leon
Original Investigation

There is a growing recognition that social engagement is important for successful aging. This is the compelling message of Drs. Bath and Deeg’s introduction to this new Journal (Bath and Deeg 2005, this issue), and I hope the same message becomes one of the pillars of success for this journal. The idea that an older person’s participation in social activity, however defined, is good for his health and well-being has not only strong intuitive appeal, but no doubt also finds resonance in our own experiences and relationships with older adults. In fact, we often might think of decline in social engagement as a harbinger of poor prognosis, the impending collapse of successful aging and life itself. As much as this idea may be part of folk wisdom, we as gerontologists are still bound to furnish its empirical verification. A solid scientific foundation will sustain our understanding of the importance of social engagement for successful aging, and will guide the development of programs or...

Keywords

Health Care Utilization Social Engagement Successful Aging Biomedical Model Incident Disability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bath PA, Deeg D (2005) Social engagement and health outcomes among older people: introduction to a special section. Eur J Ageing 2  DOI 10.1007/s10433-005-0019-4Google Scholar
  2. Bath PA, Gardiner A (2005) Social engagement and health and social care use and medication use among older people. Eur J Ageing 2  DOI 10.1007/s10433-005-0022-9
  3. Bennett KM (2005) Social engagement as a longitudinal predictor of objective and subjective health. Eur J Ageing 2  DOI 10.1007/s10433-005-0016-7
  4. Glass TA (2003) Assessing the success of successful aging. Ann Intern Med 139:382–383Google Scholar
  5. Glass TA, Mendes de Leon CF, Seeman TE, Berkman LF (1997) Beyond single indicators of social networks: a LISREL analysis of social ties among the elderly. Soc Sci Med 44:1503–1517Google Scholar
  6. Maier H, Klumb PL (2005) Social participation and survival at older ages: is the effect driven by activity content or context? Eur J Ageing 2  DOI 10.1007/s10433-005-0018-5Google Scholar
  7. Mendes de Leon CF, Glass TA, Berkman LF (2003) Social engagement and disability in a community population of older adults: the New Haven EPESE. Am J Epidemiol 157:633–642Google Scholar
  8. Ormel J, Rijsdijk FV, Sullivan M, van Sonderen E, Kempen GI (2002) Temporal and reciprocal relationship between IADL/ADL disability and depressive symptoms in late life. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 57:338–347Google Scholar
  9. Zunzunegui MV, Rodriguez-Laso A, Otero A, Pluijm SMF, Nikula S, Blumstein T, Jylhä M, Minicuci N (2005) Disability and social ties: comparative findings of the CLESA study. Eur J Ageing 2  DOI 10.1007/s10433-005-0021-xGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rush Institute for Healthy AgingRush University Medical CenterChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations