Advertisement

Axially variable-length solid element of absolute nodal coordinate formulation

  • Jialiang Sun
  • Qiang Tian
  • Haiyan HuEmail author
  • Niels L. Pedersen
Research Paper
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

An axially variable-length solid element with eight nodes is proposed by integrating the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) formulation and the absolute nodal coordinate formulation (ANCF). In addition to the nodal positions and slopes of eight nodes, two material coordinates in the axial direction are used as the generalized coordinates. As a consequence, the nodes in the ALE–ANCF are not associated with any specific material points and the axial length of the solid element can be varied over time. These two material coordinates give rise to a variable mass matrix and an additional inertial force vector. Computationally efficient formulae of the additional inertial forces and elastic forces, as well as their Jacobians, are also derived. The dynamic equation of a flexible multibody system (FMBS) with variable-length bodies is presented. The maximum and minimum lengths of the boundary elements of an FMBS have to be appropriately defined to ensure accuracy and non-singularity when solving the dynamic equation. Three numerical examples of static and dynamic problems are given to validate the variable-length solid elements of ALE–ANCF and show their capability.

Keywords

Flexible multibody dynamics Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian formulation Absolute nodal coordinate formulation Variable-length solid element 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 11521062, 11722216) and the 111 China Project (Grant B16003). It was also supported in part by Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (Grant KYCX17_0226), and by China Scholarship Council.

References

  1. 1.
    Sun, J.L., Tian, Q., Hu, H.Y.: Topology optimization of a three-dimensional flexible multibody system via moving morphable components. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 13, 021010 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Olshevskiy, A., Dmitrochenko, O., Yang, H., et al.: Absolute nodal coordinate formulation of tetrahedral solid element. Nonlinear Dyn. 88, 2457–2471 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gerstmayr, J., Sugiyama, H., Mikkola, A.: Review on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation for large deformation analysis of multibody systems. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 8, 031016 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hu, H.Y., Tian, Q., Liu, C.: Computational dynamics of soft machines. Acta. Mech. Sin. 33, 516–528 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shabana, A.A.: An absolute nodal coordinates formulation for the large rotation and deformation analysis of flexible bodies. Report, No. MBS96-1-UIC. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Olshevskiy, A., Dmitrochenko, O., Kim, C.: Three-dimensional solid brick element using slopes in the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 9, 021001 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wei, C., Wang, L., Shabana, A.A.: A total Lagrangian ANCF liquid sloshing approach for multibody system applications. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 10, 051014 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pappalardo, C.M., Wang, T., Shabana, A.A.: Development of ANCF tetrahedral finite elements for the nonlinear dynamics of flexible structures. Nonlinear Dyn. 89, 2905–2932 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tang, J.L., Ren, G.X., Zhu, W.D., et al.: Dynamics of variable-length tethers with application to tethered satellite deployment. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. 16, 3411–3424 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Escalona, J.L.: An arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian discretization method for modeling and simulation of reeving systems in multibody dynamics. Mech. Mach. Theory 112, 1–21 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Du, J.L., Cui, C.Z., Bao, H., et al.: Dynamic analysis of cable-driven parallel manipulators using a variable length finite element. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 10, 011013 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gross, D., Messner, D.: The able deployable articulated mast–enabling technology for the shuttle radar topography mission. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Aerospace Mechanisms Symposium, Pasadena, California, May 19–21 (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hayashi, H., Takehara, S., Terumichi, Y.: Numerical approach for flexible body motion with large displacement and time-varying length. In: The 3rd Joint International Conference on Multibody System Dynamics and the 7th Asian Conference on Multibody Dynamics, BEXCO, Busan, Korea, June 30–July 3 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Terumichi, Y., Kaczmarczyk, S., Sogabe, K.: Numerical approach in the analysis of flexible body motion with time-varying length and large displacement using multiple time scales. In: The 1st Joint International Conference on Multibody System Dynamics, Lappeenranta, Finland, May 25–27 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hong, D.F., Ren, G.X.: A modeling of sliding joint on one-dimensional flexible medium. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 26, 91–106 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hyldahl, P., Mikkola, A., Balling, O.: A thin plate element based on the combined arbitrary Lagrange–Euler and absolute nodal coordinate formulations. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part K J Multi-Body Dyn. 227, 211–219 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang, S., Deng, Z.Q., Sun, J., et al.: A variable-length beam element incorporating the effect of spinning. Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct. 14, 1506–1528 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hong, D.F., Tang, J.L., Ren, G.X.: Dynamic modeling of mass-flowing linear medium with large amplitude displacement and rotation. J. Fluids Struct. 27, 1137–1148 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shabana, A.A.: Definition of ANCF finite elements. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 10, 054506 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sun, J.L., Tian, Q., Hu, H.Y., et al.: Topology optimization of a flexible multibody system with variable-length bodies described by ALE–ANCF. Nonlinear Dyn. 93, 413–441 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sun, J.L., Tian, Q., Hu, H.Y., et al.: Simultaneous topology and size optimization of a 3D variable-length structure described by the ALE–ANCF. Mech. Mach. Theory 129, 80–105 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goldstein, H., Poole, C., Safko, J.: Classical Mechanics, pp. 16–21. Pearson Education, Inc., London (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brüls, O., Arnold, M.: The generalized-α scheme as a linear multistep integrator: toward a general mechatronic simulator. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 3, 041007 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tian, Q., Flores, P., Lankarani, H.M.: A comprehensive survey of the analytical, numerical and experimental methodologies for dynamics of multibody mechanical systems with clearance or imperfect joints. Mech. Mach. Theory 122, 1–57 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chung, J., Hulbert, G.M.: A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: the generalized α-method. J. Appl. Mech. 60, 371–375 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ibrahimbegovic, A.: On the choice of finite rotation parameters. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 149, 49–71 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zupan, D., Saje, M.: Finite-element formulation of geometrically exact three-dimensional beam theories based on interpolation of strain measures. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 192, 5209–5248 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang, R., Zhong, H.: Weak form quadrature element analysis of spatial geometrically exact shear-rigid beams. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 87, 22–31 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zupan, E., Saje, M., Zupan, D.: The quaternion-based three-dimensional beam theory. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 198, 3944–3956 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Park, S., Hong, H.Y., Chung, J.: Vibrations of an axially moving beam with deployment or retraction. AIAA J. 51, 686–696 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chang, J., Lin, W., Huang, C., et al.: Vibration and stability of an axially moving Rayleigh beam. Appl. Math. Model. 34, 1482–1497 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Al-Bedoor, B.O., Khulief, Y.A.: Vibrational motion of an elastic beam with prismatic and revolute joints. J. Sound Vib. 190, 195–206 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics; Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jialiang Sun
    • 1
  • Qiang Tian
    • 2
  • Haiyan Hu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Niels L. Pedersen
    • 3
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, College of Aerospace EngineeringNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjingChina
  2. 2.MOE Key Laboratory of Dynamics and Control of Flight Vehicle, School of Aerospace EngineeringBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Solid MechanicsTechnical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations