Advertisement

Acta Mechanica Sinica

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 614–622 | Cite as

Theoretical analysis for the mechanical behavior caused by an electromagnetic cycle in ITER \(\hbox {Nb}_{3}\hbox {Sn}\) cable-in-conduit conductors

Research Paper
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

The central solenoid (CS) is one of the key components of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) tokamak and which is often considered as the heart of this fusion reactor. This solenoid will be built by using \(\hbox {Nb}_{3}\hbox {Sn}\) cable-in-conduit conductors (CICC), capable of generating a 13 T magnetic field. In order to assess the performance of the \(\hbox {Nb}_{3}\hbox {Sn}\) CICC in nearly the ITER condition, many short samples have been evaluated at the SULTAN test facility (the background magnetic field is of 10.85 T with the uniform length of 400 mm at 1% homogeneity) in Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasma (CRPP). It is found that the samples with pseudo-long twist pitch (including baseline specimens) show a significant degradation in the current-sharing temperature (Tcs), while the qualification tests of all short twist pitch (STP) samples, which show no degradation versus electromagnetic cycling, even exhibits an increase of Tcs. This behavior was perfectly reproduced in the coil experiments at the central solenoid model coil (CSMC) facility last year. In this paper, the complex structure of the \(\hbox {Nb}_{3}\hbox {Sn}\) CICC would be simplified into a wire rope consisting of six petals and a cooling spiral. An analytical formula for the Tcs behavior as a function of the axial strain of the cable is presented. Based on this, the effects of twist pitch, axial and transverse stiffness, thermal mismatch, cycling number, magnetic distribution, etc., on the axial strain are discussed systematically. The calculated Tcs behavior with cycle number show consistency with the previous experimental results qualitatively and quantitatively. Lastly, we focus on the relationship between Tcs and axial strain of the cable, and we conclude that the Tcs behavior caused by electromagnetic cycles is determined by the cable axial strain. Once the cable is in a compression situation, this compression strain and its accumulation would lead to the Tcs degradation. The experimental observation of the Tcs enhancement in the CS STP samples should be considered as a contribution of the shorter length of the high field zone in SULTAN and CSMC devices, as well as the tight cable structure.

Keywords

Mechanical behavior \(\hbox {Nb}_{3}\hbox {Sn}\) cable in conduit conductor Electromagnetic cycle Sharing temperature 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 11622217), the National Key Project of Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development (Grant 11327802), National Program for Special Support of Top-Notch Young Professionals. This work was also supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grants lzujbky-2017-ot18, lzujbky-2017-k18).

References

  1. 1.
    Mitchell, N., Devred, A., Libeyre, P., et al.: The ITER magnets: design and construction status. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 22, 4200809 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ekin, J.: Superconductor Materials Science: Metallurgy, Fabrication, and Applications. Springer, Berlin (1981)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nijhuis, A., Pompe van Meerdervoort, R.P., Krooshoop, H.J.G., et al.: The effect of axial and transverse loading on the transport properties of ITER \(\text{ Nb }_{3}\text{ Sn }\) strands. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 26, 084004 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nijhuis, A., Ilyin, Y., Wessel, W.A.J., et al.: Critical current and strand stiffness of three types of \(\text{ Nb }_{3}\text{ Sn }\) strand subjected to spatial periodic bending. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 19, 1136–45 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kudoh, H., Yagai, T., Hamano, K., et al.: Theoretical and experimental analysis of \(\text{ Nb }_{3}\text{ Sn }\) strand buckling in large scale CIC conductor. Plasma Fusion Res. 9, 3405063 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yagai, T., Kudo, H., Hamano, K., et al.: Investigation of frictional force applied to strands surrounded by other strands and tribological analysis of contact surface in CIC conductor. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 24, 1–4 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    March, S.A., Bruzzone, P., Stepanov, B., et al.: Effect of thermal loading on CICC performance. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 22, 4803604 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martovetsky, N., Michael, P., Minervini, J., et al.: Test of the ITER central solenoid model coil and CS insert. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 12, 600–5 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mitchell, N.: Mechanical and magnetic load effects in \(\text{ Nb }_{3}\text{ Sn }\) cable-in-conduit conductors. Cryogenics 43, 255–70 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mitchell, N.: Summary, assessment and implications of the ITER model coil test results. Fusion Eng. Des. 66–68, 971–93 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mitchell, N.: Operating strain effects in \(\text{ Nb }_{3}\text{ Sn }\) cable-in-conduit conductors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 18, S396–S404 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mitchell, N.: Assessment of conductor degradation in the ITER CS insert coil and implications for the ITER conductors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 20, 25 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nijhuis, A., Ilyin, Y.: Transverse load optimization in \(\text{ Nb }_{3}\text{ Sn }\) CICC design; influence of cabling, void fraction and strand stiffness. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 19, 945–962 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nijhuis, A.: A solution for transverse load degradation in ITER \(\text{ Nb }_{3}\text{ Sn }\) CICCs: verification of cabling effect on Lorentz force response. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 21, 054011 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhai, Y., Bird, M.D.: Florida electro-mechanical cable model of \(\text{ Nb }_{3}\text{ Sn }\) CICCs for high-field magnet design. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 21, 115010 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhai, Y.: Electro-mechanical modeling of \(\text{ Nb }_{3}\text{ Sn }\) CICC performance degradation due to strand bending and inter-filament current transfer. Cryogenics 50, 149–57 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bajas, H., Durville, D., Ciazynski, D., et al.: Approach to heterogeneous strain distribution in cable-in-conduit conductors through finite element simulation. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 22, 4803104 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bajas, H., Durville, D., Devred, A.: Finite element modelling of cable-in-conduit conductors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 25, 054019 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jewell, M.C., Lee, P.J., Larbalestier, D.C.: The influence of \(\text{ Nb }_{3}\text{ Sn }\) strand geometry on filament breakage under bend strain as revealed by metallography. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 16, 1005 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nunoya, Y., Isono, T., Okuno, K.: Experimental investigation on the effect of transverse electromagnetic force on the VT curve of the CIC conductor. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 14, 1468–1472 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sanabria, C., Lee, P.J., Starch, W., et al.: Evidence that filament fracture occurs in an ITER toroidal field conductor after cyclic Lorentz force loading in SULTAN. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 25, 075007 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sheth, M., Lee, P., McRae, D., et al.: Study of filament cracking under uniaxial repeated loading for ITER TF strands. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 22, 4802504 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sheth, M.K., Lee, P., McRae, D.M., et al.: Procedures for evaluating filament cracking during fatigue testing of \(\,\text{ Nb }_{3}\text{ Sn }\) strand. AIP Conf. Proc. 1435, 201–208 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sanabria, C., Lee, P.J., Starch, W., et al.: Metallographic autopsies of full-scale ITER prototype cable-in-conduit conductors after full cyclic testing in SULTAN: II. Significant reduction of strand movement and strand damage in short twist pitch CICCs. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 28, 125003 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sanabria, C., Lee, P.J., Starch, W., et al.: Metallographic autopsies of full-scale ITER prototype cable-in-conduit conductors after full cyclic testing in SULTAN: III. The importance of strand surface roughness in long twist pitch conductors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 29, 074002 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Devred, A., Backbier, I., Bessette, D., et al.: Challenges and status of ITER conductor production. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 27, 044001 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hemmi, T., Nunoya, Y., Nabara, Y., et al.: Test results and investigation of Tcs degradation in Japanese ITER CS conductor samples. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 22, 4803305 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nabara, Y., Nunoya, Y., Isono, T., et al.: Examination of Japanese mass-produced conductors for ITER toroidal field coils. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 22, 4804804 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hemmi, T., Harjo, S., Nunoya, Y., et al.: Neutron diffraction measurement of internal strain in the first Japanese ITER CS conductor sample. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 26, 084002 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harjo, S., Hemmi, T., Abe, J., et al.: Residual strains in ITER conductors by neutron diffraction. Mater. Sci. Forum 777, 84–91 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sanabria, C., Lee, P.J., Starch, W., et al.: Metallographic autopsies of full-scale ITER prototype cable-in-conduit conductors after full testing in SULTAN: 1. The mechanical role of copper strands in a CICC. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 28, 085005 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Takahashi, Y., Nabara, Y., Ozeki, H., et al.: Cabling technology of conductor for ITER central solenoid. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 24, 1–4 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tomone, S., Yoshihiro, N., Yoshikazu, T., et al.: Influence of indentation on the critical current of \(\text{ Nb }_3\text{ Sn }\) strands. Phys Procedia 67, 908–913 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Qin, J.G., Xue, T.J., Liu, B., et al.: Cabling technology of \(\text{ Nb }_3\text{ Sn }\) conductor for CFETR central solenoid model coil. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 26, 1–5 (2016)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tronza, V.I., Lelekhov, S.A., Stepanov, B., et al.: Test results of RF ITER TF conductors in the SULTAN test facility. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 24, 1–5 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Devred, A., Jong, C., Mitchell, N.: Strain redistribution effects on current-sharing measurements on straight samples of large \(\text{ Nb }_{3}\text{ Sn }\) cable-in-conduit conductors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 25, 054009 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Martovetsky, N., Bessette, D., Yoshikazu, T., et al.: ITER central solenoid insert test results. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 26, 4200605 (2016)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Martovetsky, N.: Characterization of the ITER CS Conductor and Projection to the ITER CS Performance. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore (2016)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Costello, G.A.: Theory of Wire Rope. Springer, Berlin (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mitchell, N., Devred, A.: ITER magnet design description document 11-7 Conductors ITER project. Internal document reference ITER D 2NBKXY v1.2 (2009)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nijhuis, A., Ilyin, Y.: Transverse cable stiffness and mechanical losses associated with load cycles in ITER \(\text{ Nb }_{3}\text{ Sn }\) and NbTi CICCs. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 22, 055007 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    March, S.A., Bruzzone, P., Stepanov, B., et al.: Results of the TFEU6 sample tested in SULTAN. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 23, 4200204 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Breschi, M., Devred, A., Casali, M., et al.: Results of the TF conductor performance qualification samples for the ITER project. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 25, 095004 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics; Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanics and Engineering Sciences, College of Civil Engineering and MechanicsLanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Disaster and Environment in Western China attached to the Ministry of Education of ChinaLanzhouChina

Personalised recommendations