Acta Mechanica Sinica

, 27:445 | Cite as

Size effect on the static behavior of electrostatically actuated microbeams

Research Paper
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

We present a new analytical model for electrostatically actuatedmicrobeams to explore the size effect by using the modified couple stress theory and the minimum total potential energy principle. A material length scale parameter is introduced to represent the size-dependent characteristics of microbeams. This model also accounts for the nonlinearities associated with the mid-plane stretching force and the electrostatical force. Numerical analysis for microbeams with clamped-clamped and cantilevered conditions has been performed. It is found that the intensity of size effect is closely associated with the thickness of the microbeam, and smaller beam thickness displays stronger size effect and hence yields smaller deflection and larger pull-in voltage. When the beam thickness is comparable to the material length scale parameter, the size effect is significant and the present theoretical model including the material length scale parameter is adequate for predicting the static behavior of microbeam-based MEMS.

Keywords

Electrostatically actuated microbeam Size effect Deflection Pull-in voltage MEMS 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Senturia, S.: Microsystem Design. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Norwell 125–148 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lin, R.M., Wang, W.J.: Structural dynamics of microsystemscurrent state of research and future directions. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 20(5), 1015–1043 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choi, B., Lovell, E.G.: Improved analysis of microbeams under mechanical and electrostatic loads. J. Micromech. Microeng. 7(1), 24–29 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abel-Rahman, E.M., Younis, M.I., Nayfeh, A.H.: Characterization of the mechanical behavior of an electrically actuated microbeam. J. Micromech. Microeng. 12(6), 759–766 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Younis, M.I., Abdel-Rahman, E.M., Nayfeh, A.H.: A reducedorder model for electrically actuated microbeam-based MEMS. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 12(5), 672–680 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, J.H., Kang, S.M., Zou, J., et al.: Reduced-order modeling of weakly nonlinear MEMS devices with Taylor-series expansion and Arnoldi approach. IEEE Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 13(3), 441–451 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nayfeh, A.H., Younis, M.I., Abdel-Rahman, E.M.: Reducedorder models for MEMS applications. Nonlinear Dynamics 41(1–3), 211–236 (2005)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sadeghian, H., Rezazadeh, G., Osterberg, P.M.: Application of the generalized differential quadrature method to the study of pull-in phenomena of MEMS switches. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 16(6), 1334–1340 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nayfeh, A.H., Pai, P.F.: Linear and Nonlinear Structural Mechanics, Wiley, New York (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lam, D.C.C., Yang, F., Chong, A.C.M., et al.: Experiments and theory in strain gradient elasticity. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 51(8), 1477–1508 (2003)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McFarland, A.W., Colton, J.S.: Role of material microstructure in plate stiffness with relevance to microcantilever sensors. J. Micromech. Microeng. 15(5), 1060–1067 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gurtin, M. E., Murdoch, A. I.: A continuum theory of elastic material surfaces. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 57(4), 291–323 (1975)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gurtin, M.E., Murdoch, A.I.: Surface stress in solids. Int. J. Solids Struct. 14(6), 431–440 (1978)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gurtin, M.E., Weissmuller, J., Larche, F.: A general theory of curved deformable interfaces in solids at equilibrium. Philos. Mag. A 78(5), 1093–1109 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang, G.F., Feng, X.Q.: Effects of surface elasticity and residual surface tension on the natural frequency of microbeams. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(23), 231904 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang, G.F., Feng, X.Q.: Surface effects on buckling of nanowires under uniaxial compression. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(14), 141913 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang, G.F., Feng, X.Q.: Timoshenko beam model for buckling and vibration of nanowires with surface effects. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42(15), 155411 (2009)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Koiter, W.T.: Couple-stresses in the theory of elasticity: I and II. Proc. Ned. Akad. Wet. B 67(1), 17–44 (1964)MATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Toupin, R.A.: Elastic materials with couple stresses. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 11(1), 385–414 (1962)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mindlin, R.D., Tiersten, H.F.: Effects of couple-stresses in linear elasticity. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 11(1), 415–448 (1962)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mindlin, R.D.: Influence of couple-stresses on stress concentrations. Exp. Mech. 3(1), 1–7 (1963)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yang, F., Chong, A.C.M., Lam, D.C.C., et al.: Couple stress based strain gradient theory for elasticity. Int. J. Solids Struct. 39(10), 2731–2743 (2002)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Park, S.K., Gao, X.L.: Bernoulli-Euler beam model based on a modified couple stress theory. J. Micromech. Microeng. 16(11), 2355–2359 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kong, S.L., Zhou, S.J., Nie, Z.F., et al.: The size-dependent natural frequency of Bernoulli-Euler micro-beams. International Journal of Engineering Science 46(5), 427–437 (2008)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ma, H.M., Gao, X.L., Reddy, J.N.: Amicrostructure-dependent Timoshenko beam model based on a modified couple stress theory. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 56(12), 3379–3391 (2008)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang L.: Size-dependent vibration characteristics of fluidconveying microtubes. Journal of Fluids and Structures 26(4), 675–684 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen, W., Striz, A.G., Bert, C.W.: A new approach to the differential quadrature method for fourth-order equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 40(11), 1941–1956 (1997)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bellman, R., Casti, J.: Differential quadrature and long-term integration. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 34(2), 235–238 (1971)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bellman, R., Kashef, B.G., Casti, J.: Differential quadrature: A technique for the rapid solution of nonlinear partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 10(1), 40–52 (1972)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sherbourne, A.N., Pandey, M.D.: Differential quadrature method in the buckling analysis of beams and composite plates. Comput. Struct. 40(4), 903–913 (1991)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liew, K.M., Han, J.B., Xiao, Z.M., et al.: Differential quadrature method for Mindlin plates on Winkler foundations. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 38(4), 405–421 (1996)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bert, C.W., Malik, M.: Differential quadrature method in computational mechanics: a review. Appl. Mech. Rev. 49(1), 1–28 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stolken, J.S., Evans, A.G.: A microbend test method for measuring the plasticity length scale. Acta Mater. 46(14), 5109–5115 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics; Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MechanicsHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.Hubei Key Laboratory for Engineering Structural Analysis and Safety AssessmentWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations