Acta Mechanica Sinica

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 585–595

J2 invariant relative orbits via differential correction algorithm

Research Paper


This paper describes a practical method for finding the invariant orbits in J2 relative dynamics. Working with the Hamiltonian model of the relative motion including the J2 perturbation, the effective differential correction algorithm for finding periodic orbits in three-body problem is extended to formation flying of Earth’s orbiters. Rather than using orbital elements, the analysis is done directly in physical space, which makes a direct connection with physical requirements. The asymptotic behavior of the invariant orbit is indicated by its stable and unstable manifolds. The period of the relative orbits is proved numerically to be slightly different from the ascending node period of the leader satellite, and a preliminary explanation for this phenomenon is presented. Then the compatibility between J2 invariant orbit and desired relative geometry is considered, and the design procedure for the initial values of the compatible configuration is proposed. The influences of measure errors on the invariant orbit are also investigated by the Monte–Carlo simulation.


Formation flying J2 invariant orbit Differential correction Formation configuration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Schaub H. and Alfriend K. (2001). J 2 invariant relative orbits for spacecraft formations. Celestial Mech. Dyn. Astron. 79: 77–95 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meng, X., Li, J., Gao, Y.: J 2 perturbation analysis of relative orbits in satellite formation flying. Acta Mech. Sin. 38(1), 89–96 (2006, in Chinese)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li X. and Li J. (2005). Study on relative orbital configuration in satellite formation flying. Acta Mech. Sin. 21(1): 87–94 CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang, Y., Dai, J.: Satellite formation flying with J 2 perturbation. J. Nat. Univ. Defense Technol. 24(2), 6–10 (2002, in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koon, W.S., Marsden, J.E.: J 2 dynamics and formation flight. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Montreal, Canada, AIAA 2001–4090 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kasdin, N.J., Koleman, E.: Bounded, periodic relative motion using canonical epicyclic orbital elements. In: Proceedings of AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Copper Mountain, Colorado, AAS 05–186 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Biggs, J.D., Becerra, V.M.: A search for invariant relative satellite motion. In: 4th Workshop on Satellite Constellations and Formation Flying, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil, pp. 203–213 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu, L., Wang, H.: Problem about the formation flying of the constellation’s small satellites. Acta Astron. Sin. 45(1), 57–67 (2004, in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Richardson, D.L., Mitchell, W.: A third-order analytical solution for relative motion with a circular reference orbit. In: AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, San Antonio, Spain, AAS02-147 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Popescu M. and Cardos V. (1995). The domain of initial conditions for the class of three-dimensional halo periodical orbits. Acta Astron. 36: 193–196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xu, M., Xu, S.: The application of libration points and halo orbits in the earth–moon system to space mission design. Chin. J. Astron. 27(4), 695–699 (2006, in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sansone G. and Conti R. (1964). Nonlinear Differential Equations. Pergamon Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meng, X.: Formation design and perturbations of satellite formation flying based on relative orbital elements. Doctor Dissertation, Tsinghua University, Beijing (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meng Y. and Dai J. (2005). Analysis of stability, simulation and configuration design for satellite formation under the influence of the J 2 perturbation. J. Syst. Simul. 17(2): 483–487 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wei, C., Zhang, H.: Autonomous determination of relative orbit for formation flying satellites. Aerospace Control 3, 41–47 (2003, in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of AstronauticsBeihang UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations