Dynamic flight stability of hovering insects
- 477 Downloads
The equations of motion of an insect with flapping wings are derived and then simplified to that of a flying body using the “rigid body” assumption. On the basis of the simplified equations of motion, the longitudinal dynamic flight stability of four insects (hoverfly, cranefly, dronefly and hawkmoth) in hovering flight is studied (the mass of the insects ranging from 11 to 1,648 mg and wingbeat frequency from 26 to 157 Hz). The method of computational fluid dynamics is used to compute the aerodynamic derivatives and the techniques of eigenvalue and eigenvector analysis are used to solve the equations of motion. The validity of the “rigid body” assumption is tested and how differences in size and wing kinematics influence the applicability of the “rigid body” assumption is investigated. The primary findings are: (1) For insects considered in the present study and those with relatively high wingbeat frequency (hoverfly, drone fly and bumblebee), the “rigid body” assumption is reasonable, and for those with relatively low wingbeat frequency (cranefly and howkmoth), the applicability of the “rigid body” assumption is questionable. (2) The same three natural modes of motion as those reported recently for a bumblebee are identified, i.e., one unstable oscillatory mode, one stable fast subsidence mode and one stable slow subsidence mode. (3) Approximate analytical expressions of the eigenvalues, which give physical insight into the genesis of the natural modes of motion, are derived. The expressions identify the speed derivative M u (pitching moment produced by unit horizontal speed) as the primary source of the unstable oscillatory mode and the stable fast subsidence mode and Z w (vertical force produced by unit vertical speed) as the primary source of the stable slow subsidence mode.
KeywordsInsect Dynamic stability Equations of motion Navier–Stokes simulation Natural modes of motion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Sun M. and Tang J. (2002). Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. J. Exp. Biol. 205: 55–70 Google Scholar
- 8.Gebert, G., Gallmeier, P., Evers, J.: Equations of motion for flapping flight. AIAA Paper, pp 2002–4872 (2002)Google Scholar
- 9.Etkin B. and Reid L.D. (1996). Dynamics of Flight: Stability and Control. Wiley, New York Google Scholar
- 10.Ellington C.P. (1984). The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. II. Morphological parameters. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 305: 17–40 Google Scholar
- 11.Ellington C.P. (1984). The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. III. Kinematics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 305: 79–113 Google Scholar
- 12.Ennos A.R. (1989). The kinematics and aerodynamics of the free flight of some diptera. J. Exp. Biol. 142: 49–85 Google Scholar
- 13.Meriam J.L. (1975). Dynamics. Wiley, New York Google Scholar