Study on micronozzle flow and propulsion performance using DSMC and continuum methods
- 212 Downloads
In this paper, both DSMC and Navier–Stokes computational approaches were applied to study micronozzle flow. The effects of inlet condition, wall boundary condition, Reynolds number, micronozzle geometry and Knudsen number on the micronozzle flow field and propulsion performance were studied in detail. It is found that within the Knudsen number range under consideration, both the methods work to predict flow characteristics inside micronozzles. The continuum method with slip boundary conditions has shown good performance in simulating the formation of a boundary layer inside the nozzle. However, in the nozzle exit lip region, the DSMC method is better due to gas rapid expansion. It is found that with decreasing the inlet pressure, the difference between the continuum model and DSMC results increases due to the enhanced rarefaction effect. The coefficient of discharge and the thrust efficiency increase with increasing the Reynolds number. Thrust is almost proportional to the nozzle width. With dimension enlarged, the nozzle performance becomes better while the rarefaction effects would be somewhat weakened.
KeywordsMicronozzle DSMC Continuum model Slip boundary condition Thrust efficiency
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Bayt R.L. (1999). Analysis, fabrication and testing of a MEMS- fabricated micronozzles. PhD Thesis. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 5.Choudhuri, A.R., Barid, B., Gollahalli, S.R.: Effects geometry and ambient pressure on micronozzle flow. AIAA paper 2001–3331, Salt Lake City, Utah (2001)Google Scholar
- 6.Reed, B.: Decomposing solid micropropulsion nozzle performance issues. AIAA paper 2003-0672, Reno, Nevada (2003)Google Scholar
- 8.Alexeenko, A., Collins, R.J., Gimelshein, S.F., Levin, D.A.: Challenges of three-dimensional modeling of microscale propulsion devices with the DSMC method. In: Proceedings of 22nd symposium on rarefied gas dynamics, Sydney, Australia (2000)Google Scholar
- 12.Bird G.A. (1994). Molecular Gas Dynamics and the Direct Simulation of Gas Flows. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 13.Shen C. (2005). Rarefied Gas Dynamics. Fundamentals, Simulation and Micro Flows. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 14.Ikegawa M., Kobayashi J. (1990). Development of a rarefied flow simulator using the DSMC method. JSME Int. J. 30:463–467Google Scholar
- 16.Liou W.W., Fang Y. (2000). Implicit boundary conditions for direct simulation Monte Carlo method in MEMS flow predictions. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 4:119–128Google Scholar
- 17.Zhang G.X., Cai X.D., Liu M.H., Chen Y.L. (2004). Cold flow field and propulsive performance of a micro laval nozzle (in Chinese). J. Propulsion Technol. 25:54–57Google Scholar
- 18.Bayt, R.L., Breuer, K.S.: Viscous effects in supersonic mems-fabricated micronozzles. In: Proceedings of the 1998 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Anaheim (1998)Google Scholar