Acta Mechanica Sinica

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 207–217 | Cite as

Unsteady aerodynamic forces and power requirements of a bumblebee in forward flight

Article

Abstract

Aerodynamic forces and power requirements in forward flight in a bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) were studied using the method of computational fluid dynamics. Actual wing kinematic data of free flight were used in the study (the speed ranges from 0 m/s to 4.5 m/s; advance ratio ranges from 0–0.66). The bumblebee employs the delayed stall mechanism and the fast pitching-up rotation mechanism to produce vertical force and thrust. The leading-edge vortex does not shed in the translatory phase of the half-strokes and is much more concentrated than that of the fruit fly in a previous study. At hovering and low-speed flight, the vertical force is produced by both the half-strokes and is contributed by wing lift; at medium and high speeds, the vertical force is mainly produced during the downstroke and is contributed by both wing lift and wing drag. At all speeds the thrust is mainly produced in the upstroke and is contributed by wing drag. The power requirement at low to medium speeds is not very different from that of hovering and is relatively large at the highest speed (advance ratio 0.66), i.e. the power curve is J-shaped. Except at the highest flight speed, storing energy elastically can save power up to 20%–30%. At the highest speed, because of the large increase of aerodynamic torque and the slight decrease of inertial torque (due to the smaller stroke amplitude and stroke frequency used), the power requirement is dominated by aerodynamic power and the effect of elastic storage of energy on power requirement is limited.

Keywords

Insect Forward flight Unsteady aerodynamics Power Numerical flow simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ellington, C.P.: The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. IV. Aerodynamic mechanisms. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 305, 79–113 (1984)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ellington, C.P.: The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. VI. Lift and power requirements. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 305, 145–181 (1984)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dudley, R., Ellington, C.P.: Mechanics of forward flight in bumblebees. II. Quasi–steady lift and power requirements. J. Exp. Biol. 148, 53–88 (1990)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Willmott, A.P., Ellington, C.P.: The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. II. Aerodynamic consequences of kinematic and morphological variation. J. Exp. Biol. 200, 2723–2745 (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dickinson, M.H., Götz, K.G.: Unsteady aerodynamic performance of model wings at low Reynolds numbers. J. Exp. Biol. 174, 45–64 (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dickinson, M.H., Lehman, F.O., Sane, S.P.: Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science 284, 1954–1960 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, Z.J.: Two dimensional mechanism for insect hovering. Physical Rev. Lett. 85, 2216–2219 (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Usherwood, J.R., Ellington, C.P.: The aerodynamics of revolving wings. I. Model hawkmoth wings. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 1547–1564 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Usherwood, J.R., Ellington, C.P.: The aerodynamics of revolving wings. II. Propeller force coefficients from mayfly to quail. J Exp Biol. 205, 1565–1576 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sun, M., Tang, J.: Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 55–70 (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sane, S.P., Dickinson, M.H.: The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag production. J. Exp. Biol. 204, 2607–2626 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sun, M., Tang, J.: Lift and power requirements of hovering flight in Drosophila. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 2413–2427 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sun, M., Du, G.: Lift and power requirements of hovering insect flight. Acta Mech. Sinica. 19, 458–469 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sun, M., Lan, S.L.: A computational study of the aerodynamic forces and power requirements of dragonfly (Aeschnajuncea) hovering. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 1887–1901 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sun, M., Wu, J.H.: Aerodynamic force generation and power requirements in forward flight in a fruit fly with modeled wing motion. J. Exp. Biol. 206, 3065–3083 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dudley, R., Ellington, C.P.: Mechanics of forward flight in bumblebees. I. Kinematics and morphology. J. Exp. Biol. 148, 19–52 (1990)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ellington, C.P.: The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. II. Morphological parameters. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 305, 17–40 (1984)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wu, J.H., Sun, M.: Unsteady aerodynamic forces of a flapping wing. J. Exp. Biol., 207, 1137–1150 (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weis-fogh T.: Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanism for lift production. J. Exp. Biol. 59, 169–230 (1973)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dudley, R.: The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2002Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Fluid MechanicsBeijing University of Aeronautics & AstronauticsBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations