Der Pneumologe

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 339–340 | Cite as

Überdiagnostik von Bronchialkarzinomen im Screening

Wege aus der Krise
Journal Club
  • 110 Downloads

Overdiagnosis of lung cancer in screening

Ways out of the crisis

Notes

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. C. Wybranski gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD et al (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365:395–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marcus PM, Bergstralh EJ, Fagerstrom RM et al (2000) Lung cancer mortality in the Mayo Lung Project: impact of extended follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1308–1316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baldwin DR, Duffy SW, Wald NJ et al (2011) UK Lung Screen (UKLS) nodule management protocol: modelling of a single screen randomised controlled trial of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer. Thorax 66:308–313PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Becker N, Motsch E, Gross ML et al (2012) Randomized study on early detection of lung cancer with MSCT in Germany: study design and results of the first screening round. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 138:1475–1486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Infante M, Cavuto S, Lutman FR et al (2009) A randomized study of lung cancer screening with spiral computed tomography: three-year results from the DANTE trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 180:445–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lopes PA, Picozzi G, Mascalchi M et al (2009) Design, recruitment and baseline results of the ITALUNG trial for lung cancer screening with low-dose CT. Lung Cancer 64:34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lopes PA, Picozzi G, Falaschi F et al (2013) Four-year results of low-dose CT screening and nodule management in the ITALUNG trial. J Thorac Oncol 8:866–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bergh KA van den, Essink-Bot ML, Bunge EM et al (2008) Impact of computed tomography screening for lung cancer on participants in a randomized controlled trial (NELSON trial). Cancer 113:396–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gould MK, Ananth L, Barnett PG (2007) A clinical model to estimate the pretest probability of lung cancer in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest 131:383–388PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schultz EM, Sanders GD, Trotter PR et al (2008) Validation of two models to estimate the probability of malignancy in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules. Thorax 63:335–341PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Naidich DP, Bankier AA, MacMahon H et al (2013) Recommendations for the management of subsolid pulmonary nodules detected at CT: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 266:304–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klaveren RJ van, Oudkerk M, Prokop M et al (2009) Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med 361:2221–2229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Klinik für Radiologie und NuklearmedizinUniversitätsklinikum MagdeburgMagdeburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations