Microfluidic spray drying device for process-oriented product development with low sample consumption

  • S. MelzigEmail author
  • F. Purr
  • T. Lorenz
  • Z. Yan
  • J. H. Finke
  • C. Schilde
  • A. Kwade
  • A. Dietzel
Research Paper


The production of functional particle systems is becoming increasingly important in many industries. In the early development of such products, there is often not a sufficient amount of educts available or the educts are expensive and/or toxic. For this purpose, lab-scale processes are used which often differ from the later production processes. Unfortunately, the processes have a direct impact on the product properties. That makes a subsequent transfer from the unconventional lab methods to the actual fabrication process necessary, which is often associated with problems. To avoid complex additional efforts in the development of new functional particle systems and, thus, shorten the time to market, a modular microfluidic spray dryer was developed. With our new microfluidic spray dryer made from glass, it is possible to produce droplet sizes and, thus, particle sizes similar to those of conventional spray dryers in the lab or even in the production but using only smallest quantities of starting materials (product volume flow rates down to 0.03 ml/min). During the development of the micro spray dryer, process and formulation parameters as well as various microchannel geometries were investigated to determine their influence on droplet formation and, thus, on product formation. The developed micro spray dryer can be operated with various formulations and material compositions, as the micro system is made of chemically inert material, is easy to clean, pressure-resistant and can be used in a wide range of pH values.


Spray drying Microfluidics Functional particles Lab to fab 



The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the Lower Saxony Ministry of Science and Culture within the research program “Processing of poorly soluble drugs at small scale”. Furthermore, we thank Clara Sangrós and Bardiya Pourrahmati for their assistance during the studies.


  1. Amstad E, Gopinadhan M, Holtze C, Osuji CO, Brenner MP, Spaepen F, Weitz DA (2015) Production of amorphous nanoparticles by supersonic spray-drying with a microfluidic nebulator. Science 349:956–960. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amstad E, Spaepen F, Brenner MP, Weitz DA (2017) The microfluidic nebulator: production of sub-micrometer sized airborne drops. Lab Chip 17:1475–1480. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anna SL, Bontoux N, Stone HA (2003) Formation of dispersions using “flow focusing” in microchannels. Appl Phys Lett 82:364–366. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arkles B (2006) Hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity and silanes. Paint and coatings industry 22:114–135Google Scholar
  5. Cal K, Sollohub K (2010) Spray drying technique. I: hardware and process parameters. J Pharm Sci 99:575–586. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox JD, Curry MS, Skirboll SK, Gourley PL, Sasaki DY (2002) Surface passivation of a microfluidic device to glial cell adhesion: a comparison of hydrophobic and hydrophilic SAM coatings. Biomaterials 23:929–935. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Boer MJ, Tjerkstra RW, Berenschot JW, Jansen HV, Burger GJ, Gardeniers JGE, Elwenspoek M, van den Berg A (2000) Micromachining of buried micro channels in silicon. J Microelectromech Syst 9:94–103. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demming S, Llobera A, Wilke R, Büttgenbach S (2009) Single and multiple internal reflection poly(dimethylsiloxane) absorbance-based biosensors. Sens Actuators B 139:166–173. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dey T, Naughton D (2016) Cleaning and anti-reflective (AR) hydrophobic coating of glass surface: a review from materials science perspective. J Sol–Gel Sci Technol 77:1–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eggersdorfer ML, Koren V, Stolovicki E, Amstad E, Weitz DA (2017) Rapid production of submicron drug substance particles by supersonic spray drying. Cryst Growth Des 17:2046–2053. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erfle P, Riewe J, Bunjes H, Dietzel A (2017) Optically monitored segmented flow for controlled ultra-fast mixing and nanoparticle precipitation. Microfluid Nanofluid 21:179. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Erfle P, Riewe J, Bunjes H, Dietzel A (2019) Stabilized Production of Lipid Nanoparticles of Tunable Size in Taylor Flow Glass Devices with High-Surface-Quality 3D Microchannels. Micromachines (Basel). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Friend J, Yeo L (2010) Fabrication of microfluidic devices using polydimethylsiloxane. Biomicrofluidics. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Göke K, Lorenz T, Repanas A, Schneider F, Steiner D, Baumann K, Bunjes H, Dietzel A, Finke JH, Glasmacher B, Kwade A (2018) Novel strategies for the formulation and processing of poorly water-soluble drugs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 126:40–56. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. He F, Cheng Y, Xu Z, Liao Y, Xu J, Sun H, Wang C, Zhou Z, Sugioka K, Midorikawa K, Xu Y, Chen X (2010) Direct fabrication of homogeneous microfluidic channels embedded in fused silica using a femtosecond laser. Opt Lett 35:282–284. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hede PD, Bach P, Jensen AD (2008) Two-fluid spray atomisation and pneumatic nozzles for fluid bed coating/agglomeration purposes: a review. Chem Eng Sci 63:3821–3842. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim S, Kim J, Joung Y-H, Choi J, Koo C (2018) Bonding strength of a glass microfluidic device fabricated by femtosecond laser micromachining and direct welding. Micromachines (Basel). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Littringer EM, Mescher A, Schroettner H, Achelis L, Walzel P, Urbanetz NA (2012) Spray dried mannitol carrier particles with tailored surface properties–the influence of carrier surface roughness and shape. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 82:194–204. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lorenz T, Bojko S, Bunjes H, Dietzel A (2018) An inert 3D emulsification device for individual precipitation and concentration of amorphous drug nanoparticles. Lab Chip 18:627–638. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mandato S, Rondet E, Delaplace G, Barkouti A, Galet L, Accart P, Ruiz T, Cuq B (2012) Liquids’ atomization with two different nozzles: modeling of the effects of some processing and formulation conditions by dimensional analysis. Powder Technol 224:323–330. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mayer P, Vaes WHJ, Hermens JLM (2000) Absorption of hydrophobic compounds into the poly(dimethylsiloxane) coating of solid-phase microextraction fibers: high partition coefficients and fluorescence microscopy images. Anal Chem 72:459–464. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Melzig S, Niedbalka D, Schilde C, Kwade A (2018) Spray drying of amorphous ibuprofen nanoparticles for the production of granules with enhanced drug release. Colloids Surf A 536:133–141. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Melzig S, Finke JH, Schilde C, Vierheller A, Dietzel A, Kwade A (2019) Fluid mechanics and process design of high-pressure antisolvent precipitation of fenofibrate nanoparticles using a customized microsystem. Chem Eng J 371:554–564. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mondragón R, Juliá JE, Barba A, Jarque JC (2013) Influence of the particle size on the microstructure and mechanical properties of grains containing mixtures of nanoparticles and microparticles: levitator tests and pilot-scaled validation. J Eur Ceram Soc 33:1271–1280. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oosterbroek RE, Hermes DC, Kakuta M, Benito-Lopez F, Gardeniers JGE, Verboom W, Reinhoudt DN, van Berg AD (2006) Fabrication and mechanical testing of glass chips for high-pressure synthetic or analytical chemistry. Microsyst Technol 12:450–454. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schulze T, Mattern K, Früh E, Hecht L, Rustenbeck I, Dietzel A (2017) A 3D microfluidic perfusion system made from glass for multiparametric analysis of stimulus-secretioncoupling in pancreatic islets. Biomed Microdevices 19:47. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sima F, Sugioka K, Vázquez RM, Osellame R, Kelemen L, Ormos P (2018) Three-dimensional femtosecond laser processing for lab-on-a-chip applications. Nanophotonics 7:613–634. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stöber W, Fink A, Bohn E (1968) Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range. J Colloid Interface Sci 26:62–69. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thiele J, Windbergs M, Abate AR, Trebbin M, Shum HC, Förster S, Weitz DA (2011) Early development drug formulation on a chip: fabrication of nanoparticles using a microfluidic spray dryer. Lab Chip 11:2362–2368. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thies J-W, Kuhn P, Thürmann B, Dübel S, Dietzel A (2017) Microfluidic quartz-crystal-microbalance (QCM) sensors with specialized immunoassays for extended measurement range and improved reusability. Microelectron Eng 179:25–30. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vehring R (2008) Pharmaceutical particle engineering via spray drying. Pharm Res 25:999–1022. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Waheed S, Cabot JM, Macdonald NP, Lewis T, Guijt RM, Paull B, Breadmore MC (2016) 3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers. Lab Chip 16:1993–2013. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Walzel P (2019) Spraying and atomizing of liquids. Ullmann’s Encycl Ind Chem. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zellmer S, Garnweitner G, Breinlinger T, Kraft T, Schilde C (2015) Hierarchical structure formation of nanoparticulate spray-dried composite aggregates. ACS Nano 9:10749–10757. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zellmer S, Lindenau M, Michel S, Garnweitner G, Schilde C (2016) Influence of surface modification on structure formation and micromechanical properties of spray-dried silica aggregates. J Colloid Interface Sci 464:183–190. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Particle TechnologyTechnische Universität BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany
  2. 2.Institute of MicrotechnologyTechnische Universität BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany
  3. 3.PVZ - Center of Pharmaceutical EngineeringTechnische Universität BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany

Personalised recommendations