Advertisement

Autonomous cell sorting using self-secreted macromolecules

  • Min Jung Kim
  • Jae Ryoun YounEmail author
  • Young Seok SongEmail author
Research Paper
  • 88 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Particle motion in non-Newtonian microfluidics

Abstract

Much effort has been made to manipulate cells for many biomedical and environmental applications. However, controlling cells in efficient and sustainable ways is still an essential task to achieve in both science and engineering fields. Here, we introduced a strategic approach in which cells are autonomously sorted and separated in a fluidic system. We employed ‘self-secreted macromolecules’ from microalgae in the microfluidic devices and examined their various properties. The cell manipulation was determined depending on the intrinsic properties of the self-secreted biomolecules. The macromolecules self-produced by green algae allowed the size-based separation of cells. This self-sorting system would enable the design and fabrication of new types of biosystems such as bioreactors and pharmaceutical devices.

Graphic abstract

Keywords

Extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) Microalgae Microfluidics Cell manipulation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by GRRC program of Gyeonggi Province (GRRC Dankook2016–B03). In addition, this research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2018R1D1A1B07049173) and by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2018R1A5A1024127). Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) grant funded by the Korea Government (MOTIE) (P0002007, The Competency Development Program for Industry Specialist). The authors are grateful for the supports.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s).

Supplementary material

Movie S1. Separation of Sphaerocystis schroeteri the self-secreted macromolecules with a flow rate of 400 μl/hr (Re = 0.122, Wi = 88.9). The trajectories of different size cell were observed at the outlet. (AVI 1569 kb)

References

  1. Abu- Lail N, Camesano T (2003) Polysaccharide properties probed with atomic force microscopy. J Microsc 212:217–238MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amini H, Lee W, Di Carlo D (2014) Inertial microfluidic physics. Lab on a Chip 14:2739–2761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bird RB, Armstrong RC, Hassager O (1987) Dynamics of polymeric liquids, volume 1: fluid mechanics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bombelli P et al (2012) Surface morphology and surface energy of anode materials influence power outputs in a multi-channel mediatorless bio-photovoltaic (BPV) system. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14:12221–12229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan P-H, Leal L (1979) The motion of a deformable drop in a second-order fluid. J Fluid Mech 92:131–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cuecas A, Cruces J, Galisteo-López JF, Peng X, Gonzalez JM (2016) Cellular viscosity in prokaryotes and thermal stability of low molecular weight biomolecules. Biophys J 111:875–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Philippis R, Sili C, Tassinato G, Vincenzini M, Materassi R (1991) Effects of growth conditions on exopolysaccharide production by Cyanospira capsulata. Biores Technol 38:101–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deng S, Bai R, Hu X, Luo Q (2003) Characteristics of a bioflocculant produced by Bacillus mucilaginosus and its use in starch wastewater treatment. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 60:588–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doddi SK, Bagchi P (2008) Lateral migration of a capsule in a plane Poiseuille flow in a channel. Int J Multiph Flow 34:966–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doi M, Edwards SF (1988) The theory of polymer dynamics, vol 73. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Donlan RM (2002) Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces. Emerg Infect Dis 8:881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DuBois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PT, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flemming H, Wingender J (2010) The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:623–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flemming HC, Neu TR, Wozniak DJ (2007) The EPS matrix: the “house of biofilm cells”. J Bacteriol 189:7945–7947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hay ED (2013) Cell biology of extracellular matrix, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Hossain AS, Salleh A, Boyce AN, Chowdhury P, Naqiuddin M (2008) Biodiesel fuel production from algae as renewable energy. Am J Biochem Biotechnol 4:250–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hur SC, Henderson-MacLennan NK, McCabe ER, Di Carlo D (2011) Deformability-based cell classification and enrichment using inertial microfluidics. Lab Chip 11:912–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim JY, Ahn SW, Lee SS, Kim JM (2012) Lateral migration and focusing of colloidal particles and DNA molecules under viscoelastic flow. Lab Chip 12:2807–2814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim MJ, Youn JR, Song YS (2018) Focusing manipulation of microalgae in a microfluidic device using self-produced macromolecules. Lab Chip 18:1017–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Körstgens V, Flemming H-C, Wingender J, Borchard W (2001) Uniaxial compression measurement device for investigation of the mechanical stability of biofilms. J Microbiol Methods 46:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee DJ, Brenner H, Youn JR, Song YS (2013) Multiplex particle focusing via hydrodynamic force in viscoelastic fluids. Sci Rep 3:3258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li G, McKinley GH, Ardekani AM (2015) Dynamics of particle migration in channel flow of viscoelastic fluids. J Fluid Mech 785:486–505MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu H, Fang HH (2002) Extraction of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of sludges. J Biotechnol 95:249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu Y, Fang HH (2003) Influences of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) on flocculation, settling, and dewatering of activated sludge. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380390814479 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Magnaudet J, Takagi S, Legendre D (2003) Drag, deformation and lateral migration of a buoyant drop moving near a wall. J Fluid Mech 476:115–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mayer C, Moritz R, Kirschner C, Borchard W, Maibaum R, Wingender J, Flemming H-C (1999) The role of intermolecular interactions: studies on model systems for bacterial biofilms. Int J Biol Macromol 26:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCormick AJ, Bombelli P, Scott AM, Philips AJ, Smith AG, Fisher AC, Howe CJ (2011) Photosynthetic biofilms in pure culture harness solar energy in a mediatorless bio-photovoltaic cell (BPV) system. Energy Environ Sci 4:4699–4709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. More T, Yadav J, Yan S, Tyagi R, Surampalli R (2014) Extracellular polymeric substances of bacteria and their potential environmental applications. J Environ Manage 144:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morris ER (1990) Shear-thinning of ‘random coil’ polysaccharides: Characterisation by two parameters from a simple linear plot. Carbohydr Polym 13:85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mortazavi S, Tryggvason G (2000) A numerical study of the motion of drops in Poiseuille flow. Part 1. Lateral migration of one drop. J Fluid Mech 411:325–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roberts IS (1996) The biochemistry and genetics of capsular polysaccharide production in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 50:285–315MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rubinstein M, Colby RH (2003) Polymer physics, vol 23. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith DE, Babcock HP, Chu S (1999) Single-polymer dynamics in steady shear flow. Science 283:1724–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Song HY, Lee SH, Salehiyan R, Hyun K (2016) Relationship between particle focusing and dimensionless numbers in elasto-inertial focusing. Rheol Acta 55:889–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stan CA, Ellerbee AK, Guglielmini L, Stone HA, Whitesides GM (2013) The magnitude of lift forces acting on drops and bubbles in liquids flowing inside microchannels. Lab Chip 13:365–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sutherland IW (2001) The biofilm matrix–an immobilized but dynamic microbial environment. Trends Microbiol 9:222–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Svetličić V, Žutić V, Radić TM, Pletikapić G, Zimmermann AH, Urbani R (2011) Polymer networks produced by marine diatoms in the northern Adriatic Sea. Mar Drugs 9:666–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tam CK, Hyman WA (1973) Transverse motion of an elastic sphere in a shear field. J Fluid Mech 59:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Whitfield C, Valvano MA (1993) Biosynthesis and expression of cell-surface polysaccharides in gram-negative bacteria. Adv Microb Physiol 35:135–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wingender J, Neu TR, Flemming H-C (1999) What are bacterial extracellular polymeric substances? Microbial extracellular polymeric substances. Springer, New York, pp 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wloka M, Rehage H, Flemming H-C, Wingender J (2004) Rheological properties of viscoelastic biofilm extracellular polymeric substances and comparison to the behavior of calcium alginate gels. Colloid Polym Sci 282:1067–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Xiao R, Zheng Y (2016) Overview of microalgal extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and their applications. Biotechnol Adv 34:1225–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang J (2015) Particle inertial focusing and separation in serpentine microchannels: mechanisms and applications. University of Wollongong, Wollongong, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhou K, Hu Y, Zhang L, Yang K, Lin D (2016) The role of exopolymeric substances in the bioaccumulation and toxicity of Ag nanoparticles to algae. Sci Rep 6:32998CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Research Institute of Advanced Materials (RIAM)Seoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Fiber System EngineeringDankook UniversityGyeonggi-doSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations