Advertisement

Normal and tangential components of pressure tensor in spherical cavities; an investigation of certain well-known bulk fluid regularities

  • Ezat KeshavarziEmail author
  • Razieh Rabiei Dehnavi
Research Paper
  • 83 Downloads

Abstract

Using statistical thermodynamics and the DFT approach, local normal and tangential pressures are determined for LJ fluids in spherical cavities. Both pressure components are observed to exhibit an oscillatory behavior in the sense that their amplitudes increase with increasing density and decreasing cavity size. It is found that normal pressure oscillations have lower amplitudes than tangential ones because the positions of maximum peaks in the kinetic contribution to pN correspond to minimum peaks of the configurational contribution. For large enough cavities, the oscillations of tangential pressure remain at a distance of only a few molecules from the wall while normal pressure maintains a constant value for all positions in the pore. One aspect of the study involves an investigation of the validity of certain well-known bulk regularities for LJ fluids in spherical cavities. These regularities include common compression point, linear relation between pressure and temperature for each isochore, common bulk modulus point, and the Tait–Murnaghan equation. These regularities are studied for both pressure components and their relevant properties. All the four regularities mentioned are found valid for LJ fluids in spherical cavities of sizes greater than 3σ. In addition, the densities of the common compression and common bulk modulus point are found not only to depend on but also to increase with nanopore size, while they near the corresponding values for bulk LJ fluids for large cavities.

Keywords

Normal pressure Tangential pressure Spherical nanopores Confined fluid Regularity Density functional theory 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Isfahan university research council and the Sheikh Bahaei National High Performance Computing Center (SBNHPCC) in Isfahan University of Technology. Also they wish to express our gratitude to Dr. Ezzatollah Roustazadeh from ELC, IUT, for editing the final English manuscript.

References

  1. Aguilar-Pineda GE, Jimenez-Angeles F, Yu J, Lozada-Cassou M (2007) Van der waals-like isotherms in a confined electrolyte by spherical and cylindrical nanopores. J Phys Chem B 111:2033–2044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boushehri A, Tao FM, Mason EA (1993) Common bulk modulus point for compressed liquids. J Phys Chem 97:2711–2714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Calleja M, North AN, Powles JG, Rickayzen G (1991) The structure of fluid confined to spherical pores: theory and simulation. Mol Phys 73(5):973–983.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00268979100101701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Devore J, Peck R (1990) Introductory statistics. West Publishing Company, EaganGoogle Scholar
  5. Eijkel JC, Berg AV (2005) Nanofluidics: what is it and what can we expect from it? Microfluid Nanofluidics 2(1):12–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-004-0012-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fu D (2006) Investigation of excess adsorption, solvation force, and plate-fluid interfacial tension for Lennard–Jones fluid confined in slit pores. J Chem Phys 124:16470.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2189240 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gonzalez A, White JA, Roman FL, Velasco S, Evans R (1997) Density functional theory for small systems: hard spheres in a closed spherical cavity. Phys Rev Lett 79(13):2466–2469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gonzalez A, White JA, Roman FL, Velasco S (2006) Density functional theory of fluids in nanopores: analysis of the fundamental measures theory in extreme dimensional-crossover situations. J Chem Phys 125:064703.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2227389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heidari F, Keshavarzi T, Mansoori GA (2011) Attractive energy contribution to nanoconfined fluids behavior: the normal pressure tensor. Microfluid Nanofluid 10(4):899–906.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-010-0723-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heidari F, Mansoori GA, Keshavarzi E (2013) Local pressure of confined fluids inside nanoslit pores (A density functional theory prediction). Int J Theor Phys 17(2):101–119Google Scholar
  11. Helmi A (2016) Effects of a tiny sphere inserted in the center of a nano-spherical pore on the interfacial tension and surface adsorption of fluids confined innanospherical pores. J Mol Liq 216:229–238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Helmi A, Keshavarzi E (2014) The role of concavo-convex walls of a nanopore on the density profile, adsorption, solvation force, and capillary condensation of confined fluids: a DFT study. Chem Phys 433:67–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2014.01.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jimenez-Serratos G, Vega C, Gil-Villegas A (2012) Evaluation of the pressure tensor and surface tension for molecular fluids with discontinuous potentials using the volume perturbation method. J Chem Phys 137:204104.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4767375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kalikmanov VI (2001) Statistical physics of fluids: basic concepts and applications. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keshavarzi E, Helmi A (2014) Population inversion, selective adsorption, and demixing of Lennard–Jones fluids in nanospherical pores. J Phys Chem B 118:4582–4589.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp411537n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keshavarzi E, Helmi A (2015) The effects of inserting a tiny sphere in the center of a nanospherical pore on the structure, adsorption, and capillary condensation of a confined fluid (a DFT Study). J Phys Chem B 119:3517–3526.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5098052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keshavarzi T, Sedaghat F, Mansoori GA (2010) Behavior of confined fluids in nanoslit pores: the normal pressure tensor. Microfluid Nanofluid 8:97–104.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-009-0449-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keshavarzi E, Namdari F, Rabiei Jildani S (2016) Investigation of some well known bulk fluid regularities for Lennard–Jones confined fluid in nanoslit pore. Chem Phys 468:15–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2016.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keshavarzi E, Rabiei Dehnavi R, Rahimi M (2018) Effects of fluid structure on wall pressure, interfacial tension, and surface adsorption at a spherical guest particle. J Mol Liq 250:236–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.11.178 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Long Y (2012) Pressure tensor of adsorbate in nanoporous materials: molecular simulation studies. Dissertation, North Carolina State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  21. Long Y, Sliwinska-Bartkowiak M, Drozdowski H, Kempinski M, Phillips KA, Palmer JC, Gubbins KE (2013) High pressure effect in nanoporous carbon materials: effects of pore geometry. Colloids Surf A:Physicochem Eng Aspects 437:33–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.11.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Malijevsky A, Pizio O, Patrykiejew A, Sokolowski S (2004) Phase behavior of symmetric binary mixtures with partially miscible components in spherical pores. Density functional approach. J Mol Liq 112:81–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7322(03)00278-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mashayak SY, Motevaselian MH, Aluru NR (2015) An EQT-cDFT approach to determine thermodynamic properties of confined fluids. J Chem Phys 142(244116)1–7Google Scholar
  24. Najafi B, Pamafar G, Alavi S (1995) Investigation of some regularities for dense fluids using a simple equation of state. J Phys Chem 99:9248–9252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parsafar G, Najafi B (1997) A general equation of state for dense fluid. Int J Thermophys 18(5):1197–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosenfeld Y (1989) Free-energy model for the inhomogeneous hard-sphere fluid mixture and density-functional theory of freezing. Phys Rev Lett 63(9):980–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Segovia-López JG, Carbajal-Domínguez A (2015) Pressure tensor of nanoscopic liquid drops. Entropy 17:1916–1935.  https://doi.org/10.3390/e17041916 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sun ZL, Kang YS, Kang YM, Liu ZC, Ma HX (2012) Density functional study of the pressure tensor for inhomogeneous Lennard Jones fuids. Chin Phys B 21(6):066103.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/21/6/066103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sun ZL, Kang Y, Zhang J (2014) Density functional study of pressure profile for hard-sphere fluids confined in a nanocavity. AIP ADVANCES 4:031308.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4867011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tang YP (2003) On the first-order mean spherical approximation. J Chem Phys 118:4140–4148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang LY, Gu F, Wang HJ, Sun ZL (2017) Pressure profile for an associating Lennard–Jones fluid confined in a spherical cavity. J Phys Chem B 121:2142–2152.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b09861 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryIsfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations