Advertisement

An air-chamber-based microfluidic stabilizer for attenuating syringe-pump-induced fluctuations

  • Zeheng Jiao
  • Jingjing Zhao
  • Zixi Chao
  • Zheng You
  • Jiahao ZhaoEmail author
Research Paper
  • 76 Downloads

Abstract

Syringe pumps are commonly used in microfluidic systems to provide flows with precise control. But small periodic fluctuations on flow induced by the stepper motor in syringe pumps are a problem that influences the characteristics of the microfluidic system. This paper presents a microfluidic stabilizer which contains an air chamber. A specific amount of air is sealed in the air chamber and will attenuate the flow fluctuations by expanding or shrinking its volume. A theoretical model based on Euler equation is developed to clarify the characteristics of the microfluidic stabilizer. The result of simulations by finite element analysis is in good agreement with the theoretical model. A new method based on fluorescence detection and three-dimensional hydrodynamic focusing is developed to measure the flow fluctuations induced by the pumps and also to characterize the buffering capacity of the stabilizer. It is experimentally demonstrated that the fluctuation amplitude is cut to 46% by one microfluidic stabilizer and reduced to 14% by two series connected stabilizers.

Notes

References

  1. Baah D, Floyd-Smith T (2014) Microfluidics for particle synthesis from photocrosslinkable materials. Microfluid Nanofluidics 17(3):431–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen P et al (2015) Multiplex serum cytokine immunoassay using nanoplasmonic biosensor microarrays. ACS Nano 9(4):4173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Choi S et al (2011) Microfluidic-based biosensors toward point-of-care detection of nucleic acids and proteins. Microfluid Nanofluidics 10(2):231–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Huh D et al (2010) Reconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chip. Science 328(5986):1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hung LH et al (2006) Alternating droplet generation and controlled dynamic droplet fusion in microfluidic device for CdS nanoparticle synthesis. Lab Chip 6(2):174–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Iyer V, Raj A, Annabattula RK, Sen AK (2015) Experimental and numerical studies of a microfluidic device with compliant chambers for flow stabilization. J Micromech Microeng.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/25/7/075003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kang YJ, Yang S (2012) Fluidic low pass filter for hydrodynamic flow stabilization in microfluidic environments. Lab Chip 12(10):1881–1889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kang YJ et al (2014) Bubble-free and pulse-free fluid delivery into microfluidic devices. Biomicrofluidics 8(1):330–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim C et al (2016) Water-head pumps provide precise and fast microfluidic pumping and switching versus syringe pumps. Microfluid Nanofluidics 20(1):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koh A et al (2016) A soft, wearable microfluidic device for the capture, storage, and colorimetric sensing of sweat. Sci Transl Med 8(366):366ra165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kundu PK, Cohen IM (2008) Fluid mechanics, 4th edn, vol 35. Academic Press, Waltham, MA, USA, p 460Google Scholar
  12. Laser DJ, Santiago JG, Microengineering (2004) A review of micropumps. J Micromech 14(6):R35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee CC et al (2005) Multistep synthesis of a radiolabeled imaging probe using integrated microfluidics. Science 310(5755):1793–1796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li Z et al (2014) Syringe-pump-induced fluctuation in all-aqueous microfluidic system implications for flow rate accuracy. Lab Chip 14(4):744–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ligler FS, Kim JS (2010) The microflow cytometer. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  16. Maheswaran S et al (2008) Detection of mutations in EGFR in circulating lung-cancer cells. N Engl J Med 359(4):366–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nguyen NT (2002) MEMS-micropumps: a review. ASME J Fluids Eng 124(2):384–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Park J et al (2015) Atomic layer-by-layer deposition of Pt on Pd octahedra for enhanced catalysts toward the oxygen reduction reaction. ACS Nano 9(3):2635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sauret A, Spandagos C, Shum HC (2012) Fluctuation-induced dynamics of multiphase liquid jets with ultra-low interfacial tension. Lab Chip 12(18):3380–3386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Skardal A, Shupe T, Atala A (2016) Organoid-on-a-chip and body-on-a-chip systems for drug screening and disease modeling. Drug Discov Today 21(9):1399–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Surdo S et al (2018) Cavitation-assisted micromixing for polymeric nanoparticle generation. In: Multidisciplinary digital publishing institute proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  22. Utada AS et al (2005) Monodisperse double emulsions generated from a microcapillary device. Science 308(5721):537–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Veenstra TT et al (2002) The design of an in-plane compliance structure for microfluidical systems. Sens Actuators B Chem 81(2):377–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Voyvodic PL, Min D, Baker AB (2012) A multichannel dampened flow system for studies on shear stress-mediated mechanotransduction. Lab Chip 12(18):3322–3330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang H et al (2018) Single-cell compressibility quantification for assessing metastatic potential of cancer cells through multi-frequency acoustophoresis. Microfluid Nanofluidics 22(6):68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wong I, Ho CM (2009) Surface molecular property modifications for poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) based microfluidic devices. Microfluid Nanofluidics 7(3):291–306MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yang B, Lin Q (2009) A compliance-based microflow stabilizer. J Microelectromech Syst 18(3):539–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zeng W et al (2014) Characterization of syringe-pump-driven induced pressure fluctuations in elastic microchannels. Lab Chip 15(4):1110–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhao CX (2013) Multiphase flow microfluidics for the production of single or multiple emulsions for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65(11–12):1420–1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhao J, You Z (2015) Microfluidic hydrodynamic focusing for high-throughput applications. J Micromech Microeng 25(12):125006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhao J, You Z (2016) A microflow cytometer with a rectangular quasi-flat-top laser spot. Sensors 16(9):1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhao J, You Z (2018) Spark-generated microbubble cell sorter for microfluidic flow cytometry. Cytom Part A 93(2):222–231MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zeheng Jiao
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Jingjing Zhao
    • 5
  • Zixi Chao
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Zheng You
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Jiahao Zhao
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instrument, Department of Precision InstrumentTsinghua UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Precision InstrumentTsinghua UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Beijing Laboratory for Biomedical Detection Technology and Instrument, Department of Precision InstrumentTsinghua UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Beijing Innovation Center for Future ChipsTsinghua UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  5. 5.Department of Structural BiologyStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations