An air-chamber-based microfluidic stabilizer for attenuating syringe-pump-induced fluctuations
- 76 Downloads
Abstract
Syringe pumps are commonly used in microfluidic systems to provide flows with precise control. But small periodic fluctuations on flow induced by the stepper motor in syringe pumps are a problem that influences the characteristics of the microfluidic system. This paper presents a microfluidic stabilizer which contains an air chamber. A specific amount of air is sealed in the air chamber and will attenuate the flow fluctuations by expanding or shrinking its volume. A theoretical model based on Euler equation is developed to clarify the characteristics of the microfluidic stabilizer. The result of simulations by finite element analysis is in good agreement with the theoretical model. A new method based on fluorescence detection and three-dimensional hydrodynamic focusing is developed to measure the flow fluctuations induced by the pumps and also to characterize the buffering capacity of the stabilizer. It is experimentally demonstrated that the fluctuation amplitude is cut to 46% by one microfluidic stabilizer and reduced to 14% by two series connected stabilizers.
Notes
References
- Baah D, Floyd-Smith T (2014) Microfluidics for particle synthesis from photocrosslinkable materials. Microfluid Nanofluidics 17(3):431–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chen P et al (2015) Multiplex serum cytokine immunoassay using nanoplasmonic biosensor microarrays. ACS Nano 9(4):4173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Choi S et al (2011) Microfluidic-based biosensors toward point-of-care detection of nucleic acids and proteins. Microfluid Nanofluidics 10(2):231–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huh D et al (2010) Reconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chip. Science 328(5986):1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hung LH et al (2006) Alternating droplet generation and controlled dynamic droplet fusion in microfluidic device for CdS nanoparticle synthesis. Lab Chip 6(2):174–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Iyer V, Raj A, Annabattula RK, Sen AK (2015) Experimental and numerical studies of a microfluidic device with compliant chambers for flow stabilization. J Micromech Microeng. https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/25/7/075003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kang YJ, Yang S (2012) Fluidic low pass filter for hydrodynamic flow stabilization in microfluidic environments. Lab Chip 12(10):1881–1889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kang YJ et al (2014) Bubble-free and pulse-free fluid delivery into microfluidic devices. Biomicrofluidics 8(1):330–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kim C et al (2016) Water-head pumps provide precise and fast microfluidic pumping and switching versus syringe pumps. Microfluid Nanofluidics 20(1):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Koh A et al (2016) A soft, wearable microfluidic device for the capture, storage, and colorimetric sensing of sweat. Sci Transl Med 8(366):366ra165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kundu PK, Cohen IM (2008) Fluid mechanics, 4th edn, vol 35. Academic Press, Waltham, MA, USA, p 460Google Scholar
- Laser DJ, Santiago JG, Microengineering (2004) A review of micropumps. J Micromech 14(6):R35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lee CC et al (2005) Multistep synthesis of a radiolabeled imaging probe using integrated microfluidics. Science 310(5755):1793–1796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Li Z et al (2014) Syringe-pump-induced fluctuation in all-aqueous microfluidic system implications for flow rate accuracy. Lab Chip 14(4):744–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ligler FS, Kim JS (2010) The microflow cytometer. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- Maheswaran S et al (2008) Detection of mutations in EGFR in circulating lung-cancer cells. N Engl J Med 359(4):366–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nguyen NT (2002) MEMS-micropumps: a review. ASME J Fluids Eng 124(2):384–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Park J et al (2015) Atomic layer-by-layer deposition of Pt on Pd octahedra for enhanced catalysts toward the oxygen reduction reaction. ACS Nano 9(3):2635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sauret A, Spandagos C, Shum HC (2012) Fluctuation-induced dynamics of multiphase liquid jets with ultra-low interfacial tension. Lab Chip 12(18):3380–3386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Skardal A, Shupe T, Atala A (2016) Organoid-on-a-chip and body-on-a-chip systems for drug screening and disease modeling. Drug Discov Today 21(9):1399–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Surdo S et al (2018) Cavitation-assisted micromixing for polymeric nanoparticle generation. In: Multidisciplinary digital publishing institute proceedingsGoogle Scholar
- Utada AS et al (2005) Monodisperse double emulsions generated from a microcapillary device. Science 308(5721):537–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Veenstra TT et al (2002) The design of an in-plane compliance structure for microfluidical systems. Sens Actuators B Chem 81(2):377–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Voyvodic PL, Min D, Baker AB (2012) A multichannel dampened flow system for studies on shear stress-mediated mechanotransduction. Lab Chip 12(18):3322–3330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang H et al (2018) Single-cell compressibility quantification for assessing metastatic potential of cancer cells through multi-frequency acoustophoresis. Microfluid Nanofluidics 22(6):68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wong I, Ho CM (2009) Surface molecular property modifications for poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) based microfluidic devices. Microfluid Nanofluidics 7(3):291–306MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yang B, Lin Q (2009) A compliance-based microflow stabilizer. J Microelectromech Syst 18(3):539–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zeng W et al (2014) Characterization of syringe-pump-driven induced pressure fluctuations in elastic microchannels. Lab Chip 15(4):1110–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhao CX (2013) Multiphase flow microfluidics for the production of single or multiple emulsions for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65(11–12):1420–1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhao J, You Z (2015) Microfluidic hydrodynamic focusing for high-throughput applications. J Micromech Microeng 25(12):125006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhao J, You Z (2016) A microflow cytometer with a rectangular quasi-flat-top laser spot. Sensors 16(9):1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhao J, You Z (2018) Spark-generated microbubble cell sorter for microfluidic flow cytometry. Cytom Part A 93(2):222–231MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar