Advertisement

Numerical simulation of particle migration in different contraction–expansion ratio microchannels

  • Di Jiang
  • Di Huang
  • Gutian Zhao
  • Wenlai TangEmail author
  • Nan XiangEmail author
Research Paper
  • 143 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. 2018 International Conference of Microfluidics, Nanofluidics and Lab-on-a-Chip, Beijing, China

Abstract

Inertial microfluidic device has been widely used for particle/cell manipulation in recent years, due to the attractive advantages of high throughput, low cost and simple operating. As a typical inertial microfluidic microchannel pattern, the contraction–expansion microchannel is usually applied for particle focusing or separation because of the ability to be easily parallelized. However, the mechanism of particle focusing in this channel is still vague and the effects of microchannel dimension have not been considered in the former experimental researches. This paper reports the particle migration characters in microfluidic channels with contraction–expansion ratio γ = 1.0 and γ = 2.0 through numerical simulation and corresponding validation experiments. Based on lattice-Boltzmann method (LBM)–immersed boundary method (IBM) model, which numerically describes the particle behavior in the microfluid, we study the particle-focusing mechanics in contraction–expansion microchannels further with the particle trajectory and rotation data which are not easily observed in experiments. With the simulation results, it can be found that contraction–expansion ratio can obviously influence the particles on their focusing patterns. A large γ continuous contraction–expansion microchannel needs higher flow rate to keep different-sized particles separated and has better focusing performance. The secondary flow in the cross section plays an important role to focus different size particles at different equilibrium positions. Research results of these sheathless and easily paralleled contraction–expansion microchannels can provide helpful insight for particle/cell detection chip design in the future.

Keywords

Contraction–expansion microchannel Microfluidics Lattice-Boltzmann method Particle focusing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Author D. Jiang greatly acknowledges the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 51805270), and the High-level Talents Scientific Research Foundation of Nanjing Forestry University (no. GXL2018021). W. Tang acknowledges the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 51805272) and N. Xiang acknowledges the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 51875103, 51505082).

References

  1. Bhagat AAS, Hou HW, Li LD, Lim CT, Han J (2011) Pinched flow coupled shear-modulated inertial microfluidics for high-throughput rare blood cell separation. Lab on a Chip 11:1870–1878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chun B, Ladd AJC (2006) Inertial migration of neutrally buoyant particles in a square duct: an investigation of multiple equilibrium positions. Phys Fluids 18:031704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Di Carlo D, Irimia D, Tompkins RG, Toner M (2007) Continuous inertial focusing, ordering, and separation of particles in microchannels. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:18892–18897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Feng ZG, Michaelides EE (2004) The immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method for solving fluid–particles interaction problems. J Comput Phys 195:602–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guo Z, Zheng C, Shi B (2002) Discrete lattice effects on the forcing term in the lattice Boltzmann method. Phys Rev E 65:046308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Huang D, Shi X, Qian Y, Tang W, Liu L, Xiang N, Ni Z (2016) Rapid separation of human breast cancer cells from blood using a simple spiral channel device. Anal Methods 8:5940–5948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hur SC, Henderson-MacLennan NK, McCabe ERB, Di Carlo D (2011) Deformability-based cell classification and enrichment using inertial microfluidics. Lab on a Chip 11:912–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jiang D, Tang W, Xiang N, Ni Z (2016) Numerical simulation of particle focusing in a symmetrical serpentine microchannel. RSC Adv 6:57647–57657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Krüger T (2012) Computer simulation study of collective phenomena in dense suspensions of red blood cells under shear. Vieweg + Teubner Verlag, WiesbadenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Krüger T, Varnik F, Raabe D (2011) Efficient and accurate simulations of deformable particles immersed in a fluid using a combined immersed boundary lattice Boltzmann finite element method. Comput Math Appl 61:3485–3505MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kwak B, Lee S, Lee J, Lee J, Cho J, Woo H, Heo YS (2018) Hydrodynamic blood cell separation using fishbone shaped microchannel for circulating tumor cells enrichment. Sens Actuators B 261:38–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu C, Hu G, Jiang X, Sun J (2015) Inertial focusing of spherical particles in rectangular microchannels over a wide range of Reynolds numbers. Lab Chip 15:1168–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mach AJ, Kim JH, Arshi A, Hur SC, Di Carlo D (2011) Automated cellular sample preparation using a Centrifuge-on-a-Chip. Lab Chip 11:2827–2834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nam J, Huang H, Lim H, Lim C, Shin S (2013) Magnetic separation of malaria-infected red blood cells in various developmental stages. Analyt Chem 85:7316–7323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Park J-S, Jung H-I (2009) Multiorifice flow fractionation: continuous size-based separation of microspheres using a series of contraction/expansion microchannels. Analyt Chem 81:8280–8288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Park J-S, Song S-H, Jung H-I (2009) Continuous focusing of microparticles using inertial lift force and vorticity via multi-orifice microfluidic channels. Lab Chip 9:939–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Qian YH, Humières DD, Lallemand P (1992) Lattice BGK models for Navier-Stokes equation. EPL (Europhys Lett) 17:479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ren L et al (2015) A high-throughput acoustic cell sorter. Lab Chip 15:3870–3879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sajeesh P, Sen AK (2014) Particle separation and sorting in microfluidic devices: a review. Microfluid Nanofluid 17:1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sollier E et al (2014) Size-selective collection of circulating tumor cells using Vortex technology. Lab Chip 14:63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Song H et al (2015) Continuous-flow sorting of stem cells and differentiation products based on dielectrophoresis. Lab Chip 15:1320–1328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sun J et al (2018) Control over the emerging chirality in supramolecular gels and solutions by chiral microvortices in milliseconds. Nat Commun 9:2599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tsubota K, Wada S (2010) Elastic force of red blood cell membrane during tank-treading motion: Consideration of the membrane’s natural state. Int J Mech Sci 52:356–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang MM et al (2005) Microfluidic sorting of mammalian cells by optical force switching. Nat Biotechnol 23:83–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang X, Zhou J, Papautsky I (2013) Vortex-aided inertial microfluidic device for continuous particle separation with high size-selectivity, efficiency and purity. Biomicrofluidics 7:044119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xiang N, Ni Z (2015) High-throughput blood cell focusing and plasma isolation using spiral inertial microfluidic devices. Biomed Microdevice 17:110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang J, Yan S, Sluyter R, Li W, Alici G, Nguyen NT (2014) Inertial particle separation by differential equilibrium positions in a symmetrical serpentine micro-channel. Sci Rep 4:4527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang X et al (2016) A low cost and quasi-commercial polymer film chip for high-throughput inertial cell isolation. RSC Adv 6:9734–9742CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Electronic EngineeringNanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.School of Mechanical Engineering, and Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Design and Manufacture of Micro-Nano Biomedical InstrumentsSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina
  3. 3.School of Electrical and Automation Engineering, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of 3D Printing Equipment and ManufacturingNanjing Normal UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations