Advertisement

Inertia-driven enhancement of mixing efficiency in microfluidic cross-junctions: a combined Eulerian/Lagrangian approach

  • Alessia Borgogna
  • Maria Anna Murmura
  • Maria Cristina Annesini
  • Massimiliano Giona
  • Stefano CerbelliEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

Mixing of a diffusing species entrained in a three-dimensional microfluidic flow-focusing cross-junction is numerically investigated at low Reynolds numbers, \(1 \le Re \le 150\), for a value of the Schmidt number representative of a small solute molecule in water, \(Sc = 10^3\). Accurate three-dimensional simulations of the steady-state incompressible Navier–Stokes equations confirm recent results reported in the literature highlighting the occurrence of different qualitative structures of the flow geometry, whose range of existence depends on Re and on the ratio, R, between the volumetric flowrates of the impinging currents. At low values of R and increasing Re, the flux tube enclosing the solute-rich stream undergoes a topological transition, from the classical flow-focused structure to a multi-branched shape. We here show that this transition causes a nonmonotonic behavior of mixing efficiency with Re at constant flow ratio. The increase in efficiency is the consequence of a progressive compression of the cross-sectional diffusional lengthscale, which provides the mechanism sustaining the transversal Fickian flux even when the Peclet number, \({Pe=Re \, Sc}\), characterizing mass transport, becomes higher due to the increase in Re. The quantitative assessment of mixing efficiency at the considerably high values of the Peclet number considered (\(10^3 \le Pe \le 1.5 \times 10^5\)) is here made possible by a novel method of reconstruction of steady-state cross-sectional concentration maps from velocity-weighted ensemble statistics of noisy trajectories, which does away with the severe numerical diffusion shortcomings associated with classical Eulerian approaches to mass transport in complex 3d flows.

Keywords

X-Junction Mixing efficiency Flux tube Diffusion Numerical diffusion Langevin equation Concentration variance 

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (mp4 3554 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (mp4 2767 KB)

References

  1. Andreussi T, Galletti C, Mauri R, Camarri S, Salvetti MV (2015) Flow regimes in t-shaped micro-mixers. Comput Chem Eng 76:150–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aref H, Blake JR, Budišić M, Cartwright JH, Clercx HJ, Feudel U, Golestanian R, Gouillart E, Guer YL, van Heijst GF et al (2014) Frontiers of chaotic advection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1403.2953
  3. Bally F, Serra CA, Hessel V, Hadziioannou G (2011) Micromixer-assisted polymerization processes. Chem Eng Sci 66(7):1449–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cerbelli S, Alvarez M, Muzzio F (2002) Prediction and quantification of micromixing intensities in laminar flows. AIChE J 48(4):686–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cerbelli S, Garofalo F, Giona M (2008) Steady-state performance of an infinitely fast reaction in a three-dimensional open stokes flow. Chem Eng Sci 63(17):4396–4411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cerbelli S, Giona M, Garofalo F, Adrover A (2009) Characterizing relaxation timescales and overall steady-state efficiency of continuous inflow–outflow micromixers. La Houille Blanche 6:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen KK, Rowley CW, Stone HA (2015) Vortex dynamics in a pipe t-junction: recirculation and sensitivity. Phys Fluids 27(3):034107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chronopoulou L, Sparago C, Palocci C (2014) A modular microfluidic platform for the synthesis of biopolymeric nanoparticles entrapping organic actives. J Nanopart Res 16(11):2703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cortelezzi L, Ferrari S, Dubini G (2017) A scalable active micro-mixer for biomedical applications. Microfluid Nanofluid 21(3):31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Damian IR, Hardt S, Balan C (2017) From flow focusing to vortex formation in crossing microchannels. Microfluid Nanofluid 21(8):142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dentz M, de Barros FP (2015) Mixing-scale dependent dispersion for transport in heterogeneous flows. J Fluid Mech 777:178–195MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Galletti C, Arcolini G, Brunazzi E, Mauri R (2015) Mixing of binary fluids with composition-dependent viscosity in a t-shaped micro-device. Chem Eng Sci 123:300–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gorodetskyi O, Speetjens M, Anderson P (2014a) Simulation and eigenmode analysis of advective–diffusive transport in micromixers by the diffusive mapping method. Chem Eng Sci 107:30–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gorodetskyi O, Speetjens MF, Anderson PD, Giona M (2014b) Analysis of the advection-diffusion mixing by the mapping method formalism in 3d open-flow devices. AIChE J 60(1):387–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gubanov O, Cortelezzi L (2010) Towards the design of an optimal mixer. J Fluid Mech 651:27–53CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Hessel V, Löwe H, Schönfeld F (2005) Micromixers—a review on passive and active mixing principles. Chem Eng Sci 60(8):2479–2501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lashgari I, Tammisola O, Citro V, Juniper MP, Brandt L (2014) The planar x-junction flow: stability analysis and control. J Fluid Mech 753:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lasota A, Mackey MC (2013) Chaos, fractals, and noise: stochastic aspects of dynamics, vol 97. Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Leung AK, Tam YYC, Chen S, Hafez IM, Cullis PR (2015) Microfluidic mixing: a general method for encapsulating macromolecules in lipid nanoparticle systems. J Phys Chem B 119(28):8698–8706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu H, Xu K, Zhu T, Ye W (2012) Multiple temperature kinetic model and its applications to micro-scale gas flows. Comput Fluids 67:115–122MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Matsunaga T, Lee H-J, Nishino K (2013) An approach for accurate simulation of liquid mixing in a t-shaped micromixer. Lab Chip 13(8):1515–1521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meunier P, Villermaux E (2010) The diffusive strip method for scalar mixing in two dimensions. J Fluid Mech 662:134–172MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Oliveira M, Pinho F, Alves M (2012) Divergent streamlines and free vortices in Newtonian fluid flows in microfluidic flow-focusing devices. J Fluid Mech 711:171–191MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Orsi G, Roudgar M, Brunazzi E, Galletti C, Mauri R (2013) Water-ethanol mixing in t-shaped microdevices. Chem Eng Sci 95:174–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Raynal F, Beuf A, Plaza F, Scott J, Carrière P, Cabrera M, Cloarec J-P, Souteyrand É (2007) Towards better DNA chip hybridization using chaotic advection. Phys Fluids 19(1):017112CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Raynal F, Beuf A, Carrière P (2013) Numerical modeling of DNA-chip hybridization with chaotic advection. Biomicrofluidics 7(3):034107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saad WS, Prudhomme RK (2016) Principles of nanoparticle formation by flash nanoprecipitation. Nano Today 11(2):212–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sadeghi A (2018) Micromixing by two-phase hydrodynamic focusing: a 3d analytical modeling. Chem Eng Sci 176:180–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Singh MK, Kang TG, Meijer HE, Anderson PD (2008) The mapping method as a toolbox to analyze, design, and optimize micromixers. Microfluid Nanofluid 5(3):313–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sousa P, Coelho P, Oliveira M, Alves M (2011) Laminar flow in three-dimensional square–square expansions. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 166(17):1033–1048CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Stremler MA, Haselton F, Aref H (2004) Designing for chaos: applications of chaotic advection at the microscale. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 362(1818):1019–1036MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vikhansky A (2006) Coarse-grained simulation of chaotic mixing in laminar flows. Phys Rev E 73(5):056707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Villermaux E (2012) On dissipation in stirred mixtures. Adv Appl Mech 45(91):2012Google Scholar
  34. Wong SH, Ward MC, Wharton CW (2004) Micro t-mixer as a rapid mixing micromixer. Sens Actuators B Chem 100(3):359–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhao C-X, He L, Qiao SZ, Middelberg AP (2011) Nanoparticle synthesis in microreactors. Chem Eng Sci 66(7):1463–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhu T, Ye W (2010) Theoretical and numerical studies of noncontinuum gas-phase heat conduction in micro/nano devices. Numer Heat Transf Part B Fundam 57(3):203–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica Materiali AmbienteSapienza Università di RomaRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations