Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 18, Issue 5–6, pp 1265–1275 | Cite as

LCAT pump optimization for an integrated microfluidic droplet generator

Research Paper


We demonstrate an on-chip integrated droplet generator enabled by lateral cavity acoustic transducer (LCAT) oil and water microfluidic pumps. Both oil-in-water (O/W) and water-in-oil (W/O) droplet generation are demonstrated. The LCAT pumps are energized by piezoelectric acoustic energy to induce rectified microstreaming for pumping liquid. In this work, the analysis of geometric optimization of LCAT pumps was performed. The LCAT droplet generator was characterized in terms of size and frequency of generated droplets. For the W/O droplet generation, the controllable range of droplet diameter was 50–420 μm; while for the O/W droplet generation, the controllable range of droplet diameter is 60–150 μm. The minimum voltage for stable droplet generation can be as low as 4 V pp. The first LCAT pump for pumping oil is also demonstrated by lipophilic treatment of the microfluidic channel. The integrated LCAT droplet generator offers a valveless, portable, low-cost, and low-power platform for generating microfluidic droplets. The LCAT droplet generator can be a key enabling microfluidic component toward the realization of a portable diagnostic/screening platform.


PDMS Droplet Size Main Channel Microfluidic Device Side Channel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors acknowledge financial support from a postdoctoral fellowship awarded by the National Science Council in Taiwan and partial funding from the NSF I/UCRC Center for Advanced Design and Manufacturing of Integrated Microfluidics (CADMIM, award number IIP-1362165).


  1. Adzima BJ, Velankar SS (2006) Pressure drops for droplet flows in microfluidic channels. J Micromech Microeng 16(8):1504–1510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bilotkach K, Lee AP (2008) Fabrication of PDMS membranes with aqueous molds for microfluidic system. In: The 12th international conference on miniaturized systems for chemistry and life sciences, October 12–16, San Diego, California, USA, pp 1483–1485Google Scholar
  3. Bransky A, Korin N, Khoury M et al (2009) A microfluidic droplet generator based on a piezoelectric actuator. Lab Chip 9(4):516–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brassard D, Malic L, Normandin F et al (2008) Water-oil core-shell droplets for electrowetting-based digital microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 8(8):1342–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chin CD, Linder V, Sia SK (2012) Commercialization of microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. Lab Chip 12(12):2118–2134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi K, Ng AHC, Fobel R (2012) Digital microfluidics. Annu Rev Anal Chem 5:413–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dentry MB, Friend JR, Yeo LY (2014) Continuous flow actuation between external reservoirs in small-scale devices driven by surface acoustic waves. Lab Chip 14(4):750–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doria A, Patel MV, Lee AP (2011) Rapid blood plasma separation with air-liquid cavity acoustic transducers. In: The 15th international conference on miniaturized systems for chemistry and life sciences, October 2–6, Seattle, Washington, USA, pp 1882–1884Google Scholar
  9. Duncanson WJ, Lin T, Abate AR et al (2012) Microfluidic synthesis of advanced microparticles for encapsulation and controlled release. Lab Chip 12(12):2135–2145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fang WF, Ting SC, Hsu CW et al (2012) Locally enhanced concentration and detection of oligonucleotides in a plug-based microfluidic device. Lab Chip 12(5):923–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garstecki P, Fuerstman MJ, Stone HA (2006) Formation of droplets and bubbles in a microfluidic T-junction-scaling and mechanism of break-up. Lab Chip 6(3):437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghosh N, Bajoria A, Vaidya AA (2009) Surface chemical modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane)-based biomimetic materials: oil-repellent surfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interf 1(11):2636–2644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hatch AC, Fisher JS et al (2011) 1-Million droplet array with wide-field fluorescence imaging for digital PCR. Lab Chip 11(22):3838–3845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Iwai K, Higa AT, Sochol RD et al (2011) Finger-powered microdroplet generator. Transducers’11, pp 230–233Google Scholar
  15. Joensson HN, Andersson Svahn H (2012) Droplet microfluidics—a tool for single-cell analysis. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 51(49):12176–12192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karatay E, Haase AS, Visser CW (2013) Control of slippage with tunable bubble mattresses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(21):8422–8426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lagus TP, Edd JF (2013) A review of the theory, methods and recent applications of high-throughput single-cell droplet microfluidics. J Phys D Appl Phys 46(11):114005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laser DJ, Santiago JG (2004) A review of micropumps. J Micromech Microeng 14(6):R35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee AP, Patel MV, Tovar AR (2010) Microfluidic air–liquid cavity acoustic transducers for on-chip integration of sample preparation and sample detection. J Lab Autom 15(6):449–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li L, Ismagilov F (2010) Protein crystallization using microfluidic technologies based on valves, droplets, and SlipChip. Annu Rev Biophys 39:139–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu RH, Lenigk R, Druyor-Sanchez RL et al (2003) Hybridization enhancement using cavitation microstreaming. Anal Chem 75(8):1911–1917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marmottant P, Hilgenfeldt S (2003) Controlled vesicle deformation and lysis by single oscillating bubbles. Nature 423(6936):153–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marmottant P, Hilgenfeldt S (2004) A bubble-driven microfluidic transport element for bioengineering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(26):9523–9527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Okabe Y, Lee AP (2014) LCAT DNA shearing. J Lab Autom 19(2):163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Patel MV, Tovar AR, Lee AP (2012) Lateral cavity acoustic transducer as an on-chip cell/particle microfluidic switch. Lab Chip 12(1):139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schwartz JA, Vykoukal JV, Gascoyne PRC (2004) Droplet-based chemistry on a programmable micro-chip. Lab Chip 4(1):11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Teh SY, Lin R, Hung LH et al (2008) Droplet microfluidics. Lab Chip 8(2):198–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Theberge AB, Courtois F, Schaerli Y et al (2010) Microdroplets in microfluidics: an evolving platform for discoveries in chemistry and biology. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 49(34):5846–5868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tovar AR, Lee AP (2009) Lateral cavity acoustic transducer. Lab Chip 9(1):41–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tovar AR, Patel MV, Lee AP (2011) Lateral air cavities for microfluidic pumping with the use of acoustic energy. Microfluid Nanofluidics 10(6):1269–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Trivedi V, Doshi A et al (2010) A modular approach for the generation, storage, mixing, and detection of droplet libraries for high throughput screening. Lab Chip 10(18):2433–2442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang C, Jalikop SV, Hilgenfeldt S (2011) Size-sensitive sorting of microparticles through control of flow geometry. Appl Phys Lett 99:034101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang Y, Ho YP, Chiu YL (2013) A programmable microenvironment for cellular studies via microfluidics-generated double emulsions. Biomaterials 34(19):4564–4572CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations