Advertisement

Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 513–526 | Cite as

Integrated micromixer for incubation and separation of cancer cells on a centrifugal platform using inertial and dean forces

  • Gerson R. Aguirre
  • Vitaly Efremov
  • Maria Kitsara
  • Jens Ducrée
Research Paper

Abstract

In this article, we demonstrate for the first time the integration of a micromixer unit for the creation of a cancer cell–microbead complex, and an inertial flow unit for the detection and separation in a centrifugal platform. The two units work under different operational principles but both exploit the centrifugal pseudo-force. The units achieve a high level of binding efficiency and a mechanism for cell sorting and guiding with the established asymmetric inertial flow system, respectively. The design of the passive micromixer takes advantage of the centrifugal force in an orthogonal direction to create what has been termed “flipping” to increase chaotic advection in the unit by turning the microchannel contents 180° at each turn. Blood was spiked into the system to identify maximum operational range. In non-spiked samples, cancer cells (MCF7) and microbeads bind together to generate cell–bead complexes (MCF7-PS) with a binding efficiency of 97.1 %; however, blood-spiked samples of 2 % v/v blood content were found to have a separation of 92.5 %, which diminished further with increasing blood content (5 % v/v blood). Once the complexes enter the inertial flow unit under these conditions, it remains in high operational flow-focusing standard with up to 98.7 % ± 1.4 of the introduced cancer cells reaching the designated outlet; for both units, unpaired statistical t tests show P < 5 with 95 % confidence level. This integration allows for the positive detection of cancer cells with reactive epitopes while the increased complex averaged size of cancer cell–microbeads standardizes the flow rate required for size-based flow-focusing. It can also be optimized for negative selection or multivariate detection of different cell biomarkers by enhancing sedimentation forces.

Keywords

MCF7 Cell Secondary Flow Coriolis Force Blood Content Curve Channel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank Dr Macdara Glynn for supplying MCF7 cells. This material is based upon works supported by the Science Foundation Ireland under Grant No. 10/CE/B1821.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (M4 V 2867 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (M4 V 2215 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (M4 V 5098 kb)

References

  1. Abaxis.com. Accessed May, 2013Google Scholar
  2. Asmolov E (1999) The inertial lift on a spherical particle in a plane Poiseuille flow at large channel Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech 381:63–87CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Boubnov BM, Golitsyn GS (1995).Convection in rotating fluids. Springer, Berlin, p 8. ISBN: 0-7923-3371-3Google Scholar
  4. Brenner T, Glatze T, Zengerle R, Ducree J (2005) Batch-mode mixing on centrifugal microfluidic platforms. Lab Chip 5:146–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burger R, Ducree J (2012) Handling and analysis of cells and bioparticles on centrifugal microfluidic platforms. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 12:407–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Capretto L, Cheng W, Hill M, Zhang X (2011) Micromixing within microfluidic devices. Top Curr Chem 304:27–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen G, Albertsa C, Rodriguez W, Toner M (2010) Concentration and purification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 virions by microfluidic separation of superparamagnetic nanoparticles. Anal Chem 82:723. doi: 10.1021/ac9024522 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cho YK, Lee JG, Park JM, Lee BS (2007) One-step pathogen specific DNA extraction from whole blood on a centrifugal microfluidic device. Lab Chip 7:565–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fang W, Yang J (2009) A novel microreactor with 3D rotating flow to boost fluid reaction and mixing of viscous fluids. Sens Actuators B Chem 140:629–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Godino N, Gorkin R III, Linares AV, Burger R, Ducree J (2013) Comprehensive integration of homogeneous bioassays via centrifugo-pneumatic cascading. Lab Chip 13:685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gossett D, Di Carlo D (2009) Particle focusing mechanisms in curving confined flows. Anal Chem 81:8459–8465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hansson J, Karlsson J, Haraldsson T, Brismar H, van der Wijngaart W, Russom A (2012) Inertial microfluidics in parallel channels for high-throughput applications. Lab Chip 12:4644–4650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hogg AJ (1994) Inertial migration of a non-neutrally buoyant particle in a two-dimensional shear flow. J Fluid Mech 272:285–318CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Hong CC, Choi J-W, Ahn CH (2004) A novel in-plane passive microfluidic mixer with modified Tesla structures. Lab Chip 4:109–113. doi: 10.1039/B305892A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hou HW, Bhagat AAS, Lee WC, Huang S, Han J, Lim CT (2011) Microfluidic devices for blood fractionation. Micromachines 2:319–343. doi: 10.3390/mi2030319 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Humphry K, Kulkarni P, Weitz D, Morris J, Stone J (2010) Axial and lateral particle ordering in finite Reynolds number channel flows. Phys Fluids 22:081703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Joseph DD (2002) Power law correlations for the lift force on a particle in plane Poiseuille flow DDJ/2002/papers/Wang-PLCorr/nt_lift.docGoogle Scholar
  18. Jung JH, Kim GY, Seo TS (2011) An integrated passive micromixer–magnetic separation–capillary electrophoresis microdevice for rapid and multiplex pathogen detection at the singlecell level. Lab Chip 11(20):3465–3470. doi: 10.1039/c1lc20350a
  19. Kamholz A, Weigl B, Finlayson B, Yager P (1999) Quantitative analysis of molecular interaction in a microfluidic channel: T-sensor. Anal Chem 71:5340–5347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirby D, Siegrist J, Kijanka G, Burger R, Sheils O, O’Leary J, Ducrée J (2012) Centrifugo-magnetophoretic particle separation. Microfluid Nanofluid. doi: 10.1007/s10404-012-1007-6 Google Scholar
  21. Kitsara M, Aguirre G, Efremov V, Ducree J (2013) Lab-on-a-disc platform for particle focusing induced by inertial forces. In: Proceedings of SPIE 8765, Bio-MEMS and Medical Microdevices 87650R. doi: 10.1117/12.2017438
  22. Kuntaegowdanahalli S, Bhagat S, Kumarb G, Papautsky I (2009) Inertial microfluidics for continuous particle separation in spiral microchannels. Lab Chip 9:2973–2980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. La M, Park SJ, Kim HW, Park JJ, Ahn KT, Ryew SM, Kim DS (2013) A centrifugal force-based serpentine micromixer (CSM) on a plastic lab-on-a-disk for biochemical assays. Microfluid Nanofluid 15:87–98. doi: 10.1007/s10404-012-1127-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levin S, Giddings J (1991) Continuous separation of particles from macromolecules in split-flow thin (SPLITT) cells. J Chem Tech Biotechnol 50:43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lu L, Ryu K, Liu C (2002) A magnetic microstirrer and array for microfluidic mixing. J Microelectromech Syst 11:462–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matas J, Morris J, Guazelli E (2009) Lateral force on a rigid sphere in large-inertia laminar pipe flow. J Fluid Mech 621:59–67CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Morijiri T, Hikida T, Yamada M, Seki M (2010) Microfluidic counterflow centrifugal elutriation system for sedimentation-based cell separation. 978-0-9798064-3-8/μTAS 2010/$20©2010 CBMSGoogle Scholar
  28. Morijiri T, Sunahiro S, Senaha M, Yamada M, Seki M (2011) Sedimentation pinched-flow fractionation for size- and density-based particle sorting in microchannels. Microfluid Nanofluid 11:105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mugele F, Baret JC (2005) Electrowetting: from basics to applications. J Phys Condens Matter 17:R705–R774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Noroozi Z, Kido H, Micic M, Pan H, Bartolome C, Princevac M, Zovaland J, Madou M (2009) Reciprocating flow-based centrifugal microfluidics mixer. Rev Sci Instrum 80:075102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oakey J, Applegate R Jr, Arellano E, Carlo DD, Graves S, Toner M (2010) Particle focusing in staged inertial microfluidic devices for flow cytometry. Anal Chem 82:3862–3867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pappas D, Wong K (2007) Cellular separations: a review of new challenges in analytical chemistry. Anal Chim Acta 601:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paterlini-Brechot P, Benali L (2007) Circulating tumor cells (CTC) detection: clinical impact and future directions. Cancer Lett 253:180–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schaff U, Sommer G (2011) Whole blood immunoassay based on centrifugal bead sedimentation. Clin Chem 57:753–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sharma R, Nandakumar K (1995) Flow through rotating rectangular ducts. Phys Fluids 7:1568–1575CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Siegrist J, Gorkin R, Bastien M, Stewart G, Peytavi R, Kido H, Bergeron M, Madou M (2010) Validation of a centrifugal microfluidic sample lysis and homogenization platform for nucleic acid extraction with clinical samples. Lab Chip 10:363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sollier E, Rostainga H, Pouteaua P, Fouilleta Y, Achard JL (2009) Passive microfluidics devices for plasma extraction from whole human blood. Sens Actuators B Chem 141:617–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stott SL, Toner M et al (2010) Isolation of circulating tumor cells using a microvortex generating herringbone chip. PNAS 107:18392–18397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stroock A, Dertinger S, Ajdari A, Mezic I, Stone H, Whitesides G (2002) Chaotic mixer for microchannels. Science 295:647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sudarsan AP, Ugaz V (2006) Multivortex micromixing. PNAS 103(19):7228–7233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tibbe A, Miller M, Terstappen L (2007) Statistical considerations for enumeration of circulating tumor cells. Cytom A 71:154–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tsai H Jr, Lin L (2002) Active microfluidic mixer and gas bubbler driven by thermal bubble micropump. Sens Actuators A Phys 97:665–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vijayendran R, Motsegood K, Beebe D, Leckband D (2003) Evaluation of a three-dimensional micromixer in a surface-based biosensor. Langmuir 19:1824–1828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Voldman J, Gray J, Schmidt J (2000) An integrated liquid mixer/valve. Microelectromech Syst 9:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang H, Iovenitti P, Harvey E, Masood S (2002) Optimizing layout of obstacles for enhanced mixing in microchannels. Smart Mater Struct 11:662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wong S, Ward M, Wharton C (2004) Micro T-mixer as a rapid mixing micromixer. Sens Actuators B 100:365–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xin W, Chen X, Mab X, Kong X, Xua Z, Wang J (2011) Fast DNA hybridization on a microfluidic mixing device based on pneumatic driving. Talanta 84:565–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang Z, Matsumoto S, Goto H, Matsumoto M, Maeda R (2001) Ultrasonic micromixer for microfluidic systems. Sens Actuators A Phys 93:266–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang J, Guo Q, Liu M, Yang J (2008) A lab-on-CD prototype for high-speed blood separation. J Micromech Microeng 18:125025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang J, Li W, Li M, Alici G, Nguyen N-T (2013) Particle inertial focusing and its mechanism in a serpentine microchannel. Microfluid Nanofluid. doi: 10.1007/s10404-013-1306-6

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerson R. Aguirre
    • 1
    • 2
  • Vitaly Efremov
    • 2
  • Maria Kitsara
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jens Ducrée
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Physical SciencesDublin City UniversityDublinIreland
  2. 2.Biomedical Diagnostics InstituteNational Centre for Sensor ResearchDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations