Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 233–243 | Cite as

A mathematical model for nanoparticle melting with density change

Research Paper

Abstract

The melting process of a spherical nanoparticle is analysed using a mathematical model derived from continuum theory. The standard model for macro-scale melting is modified to include melting point depression using the Gibbs–Thomson equation. The key difference between the current and previous work in the melting of nanoparticles is that the difference in densities between the solid and liquid phases is accounted for. This modifies the energy balance at the phase change interface to include a kinetic energy term, which then changes the form of the equation, and it also requires an advection term in the heat equation for the liquid phase. Approximate analytical and numerical solutions are presented for the melting of particles in the range 10–100 nm. It is shown that when the density difference is included in the model, melting is significantly slower than when density is assumed constant throughout the process. This is attributed to the flowing liquid providing a sink term, namely kinetic energy, in the energy balance. The difference in results is greatest for small particles; however, it is concluded that the varying density model will never reduce to the constant density model resulting in a difference of around 15 % even at the macro-scale.

Keywords

Phase change Nanoparticle Expansion Melting 

References

  1. Alexiades V, Solomon AD (1993) Mathematical modelling of freezing and melting processes. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Back JM, McCue SW, Hsieh MH-N, Moroney TJ (2014) The effect of surface tension and kinetic undercooling on a radially-symmetric melting problem. Appl Math Comput 229:41–52CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Buffat P, Borel JP (1976) Size effect on the melting temperature of gold particles. Phys Rev A 13(6):2287–2297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charach C, Rubinstein I (1992) Pressure–temperature effects in planar Stefan problems with density change. J Appl Phys 71:1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis SH (2001) Theory of solidification. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Font F, Myers TG (2013) Spherically symmetric nanoparticle melting with a variable phase change temperature. J Nanopart Res 15(12):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Font F, Mitchell SL, Myers TG (2013) One-dimensional solidification of supercooled melts. Int J Heat Mass Transf 62:411–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guisbiers G, Kazan M, Van Overschelde O, Wautelet M, Pereira S (2008) Mechanical and thermal properties of metallic and semiconductive nanostructures. J Phys Chem C 112:4097–4103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kofman R, Cheyssac P, Lereah Y, Stella A (1999) Melting of clusters approaching 0D. Eur Phys J D 9:441–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lai SL, Guo JY, Petrova V, Ramanath G, Allen LH (1996) Size-dependent melting properties of small tin particles: nanocalorimetric measurements. Phys Rev Lett 77(1):99–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McCue SW, Wu B, Hill JM (2009) Micro/nanoparticle melting with spherical symmetry and surface tension. IMA J Appl Math 74:439–457CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Mitchell SL, Vynnycky M (2009) Finite-difference methods with increased accuracy and correct initialization for one-dimensional Stefan problems. Appl Math Comput 215(4):1609–1621CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Myers TG, Low J (2011) An approximate mathematical model for solidification of a flowing liquid in a microchannel. Microfluid Nanofluid 11:417–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Myers TG, Low J (2013) Modelling the solidification of a power-law fluid flowing through a narrow pipe. Int J Thermal Sci 70:127–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Myers TG, Mitchell SL, Font F (2012) Energy conservation in the one-phase supercooled Stefan problem. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 39(10):1522–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nanda KK (2009) Size dependent melting of nanoparticles. Pramana J Phys 72(4):617–628CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Natale MF, Santillan Marcus EA, Tarzia DA (2010) Explicit solutions for one-dimensional two-phase free boundary problems with either shrinkage or expansion. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl 11:1946–1952CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Ockendon J, Lacey A, Movchan A, Howison S (1999) Applied partial differential equations. Oxford University Press, OxfordMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Plech A, Kotaidis V, Grésillon S, Dahmen C, Von Plessen G (2004) Laser-induced heating and melting of gold nanoparticles studied by time-resolved X-ray scattering. Phys Rev B 70(19):195423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ruan C, Murooka Y, Raman RK, Murdick RA (2007) Dynamics of size-selected gold nanoparticles studied by ultrafast electron nanocrystallography. Nano Lett 7(5):1290–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Travis KP, Todd BD, Evans DJ (1997) Departure from Navier–Stokes hydrodynamics in confined liquids. Phys Rev E 55(4):4288–4295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wu B, McCue SW, Tillman P, Hill JM (2009) Single phase limit for melting nanoparticles. Appl Math Model 33(5):2349–2367CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. Wu B, Tillman P, McCue SW, Hill JM (2009) Nanoparticle melting as a Stefan moving boundary problem. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 9(2):885–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yang Z, Sen M, Paolucci S (2003) Solidification of a finite slab with convective cooling and shrinkage. Appl Math Model 27:733–762CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre de Recerca MatemàticaBellaterraSpain
  2. 2.Departament de Matemàtica Aplicada IUniversitat Politècnica de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.MACSI, Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of LimerickLimerickIreland

Personalised recommendations