Advertisement

Programmable LDEP technology to fabricate versatile master molds for PDMS continuous-flow microfluidic applications

  • 479 Accesses

  • 3 Citations

Abstract

This paper presents an innovative versatile method aiming at rapid fabrication of a master for polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) molding. This technology is relying on liquid dielectrophoresis electromechanical microfluidic transduction for programmable ultraviolet (UV) glue manipulation. It enables formation of the master in a tailor-made approach, avoiding the need of micromachined structures unlike in conventional methods. The principle is simple: UV glue, while in liquid phase, is actuated onto an array of electrodes patterned on a Si substrate and cured afterward by UV exposure. The silicon chip and the glue microstructures defined atop of it then play the role of a master for PDMS molding. The glue microstructures’ shape is hemispherical which is of high interest for many microfluidic applications. This concept is assessed and validated with two different PDMS chip replica designs, both of them illustrating representative applications in continuous microfluidic: a T-junction design for inflow droplet generation and a “Quake” type valve. Lastly, this protocol has shown to be recyclable since the UV glue microstructures once formed can be easily removed by immersion in an acetone bath, such as the chip is reset and can be reprogrammed afterward to build another glue channels geometry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Ahmed R, Jones TB (2006) Dispensing picoliter droplets on substrates using dielectrophoresis. J Electrostat 64:543–549

  2. Beebe DJ, Mensing GA, Walker GM (2002) Physics and applications of microfluidics in biology. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 4:261–286

  3. Berthier E, Young EWK, Beebe D (2012) Engineers are from PDMS-land, biologists are from polystyrenia. Lab Chip 12:1224–1237

  4. Brown CV, Wells GG, Newton MI, McHale G (2009) Voltage-programmable liquid optical interface. Nat Photonics 3:403–405

  5. Chou HP, Unger MA, Quake SR (2001) A Microfabricated Rotary Pump. Biomed Microdevices 3:323–330

  6. Chugh D, Kaler KVIS (2008) Leveraging liquid dielectrophoresis for microfluidic applications. Biomed Mater 3:034009

  7. Chugh D, Kaler KVIS (2012) Integrated liquid and droplet dielectrophoresis for biochemical assays. Microfluid Nanofluid 8:445–456

  8. De Mello A (2002) Plastic fantastic? Lab Chip 2:31N–36N

  9. Duffy DC, McDonald JC, Schueller OJ, Whitesides GM (1998) Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal Chem 70:4974–4984

  10. Fair RB (2007) Digital microfluidics: is a true lab-on-a-chip possible? Microfluid Nanofluid 3:245–281

  11. Fouillet F, Jary D, Chabrol C, Claustre P, Peponnet C (2008) Digital microfluidic design and optimization of classic and new fluidic functions for lab on a chip systems. Microfluid Nanofluid 4:159–165

  12. Fujii T (2002) PDMS-based microfluidic devices for biomedical applications. Microelectron Eng 61–62:907–914

  13. Garstecki P, Fuerstmana MJ, Stonec HA, Whitesides GM (2006) Formation of droplets and bubbles in a microfluidic T-junction—scaling and mechanism of break-up. Lab Chip 6:437–446

  14. Goff CM, Chao SH, Johnson RH, Meldrum DR (2012) Surface tension-controlled three-dimensional water molds: theory and applications. Microfluid Nanofluid 13:891–897

  15. Hu Z, Kwon GH, Kim CB, Kim DP, Lee SH (2010) Integration of movable structures in PDMS microfluidic channels. BioChip J 4:117–122

  16. Iverson BD, Garimella SV (2008) Recent advances in microscale pumping technologies: a review and evaluation. Microfluid Nanofluid 5:145–174

  17. Jones TB (2001) Liquid dielectrophoresis on the microscale. J Electrostat 51(52):290–299

  18. Jones TB, Wang KL (2004) Frequency-dependent electromechanics of aqueous liquids: electrowetting and dielectrophoresis. Langmuir 20:2813–2818

  19. Kaler KVIS, Prakash R, Chugh D (2010) Liquid dielectrophoresis and surface microfluidics. Biomicrofluidics 4:1–17

  20. Link DR, Anna SL, Weitz DA, Stone HA (2004) Geometrically mediated breakup of drops in microfluidic devices. Phys Rev Lett 92:054503

  21. Liu X, Wang Q, Qin J, Lin B (2009) A facile ‘liquid-molding’ method to fabricate PDMS microdevices with 3-dimensional channel topography. Lab Chip 9:1200–1205

  22. McDonald JC, Duffy DC, Anderson JR, Chiu DT, Wu H, Schueller OJ, Whitesides GM (2000) Fabrication of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Electrophoresis 21:27–40

  23. Park JY, Hwang CM, Lee S-H (2008) Ice-lithographic fabrication of concave microwells and a microfluidic network. Biomed Microdevices 11:129–133

  24. Renaudot R, Agache V, Daunay B, Lambert P, Kumemura M, Fouillet Y, Collard D, Fujita H (2011) Optimization of liquid dielectrophoresis (LDEP) digital microfluidic transduction for biomedical applications. Micromachines 2:258–273

  25. Renaudot R, Daunay B, Kumemura M, Agache V, Jalabert L, Collard D, Fujita H (2013a) Optimized micro devices for liquid-dielectrophoresis (LDEP) actuation of conductive solutions. Sens Actuators, B 177:620–626

  26. Renaudot R, Nguyen T, Fouillet Y, Jary D, Kumemura M, Jalabert L, Collard D, Fujita H, Agache V (2013b) Alternative method for local surface functionalization using liquid dielectrophoresis: an application with polyethyleneimine polymer for bacteria trapping onto a surface. RSC Adv 3:9214–9218

  27. Renaudot R, Agache V, Fouillet Y, Kumemura M, Jalabert L, Collard D, Fujita H (2013) Performances of a broad range of dielectric stacks for liquid dielectrophoresis transduction. Microfluid Nanofluid 15:297–307

  28. Unger MA, Chou HP, Thorsen T, Scherer A, Quake SR (2000) Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. Science 288:113–116

  29. Vitralit 6128 UV glue properties, web site: http://www.eurobond-adhesives.co.uk/download/pdfs/Vitralit%206128.pdf

  30. Whitesides GM (2006) The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442:368–373

  31. Xu JH, Li SW, Tan J, Luo GS (2008) Correlations of droplet formation in T-junction microfluidic devices: from squeezing to dripping. Microfluid Nanofluid 5:711–717

  32. Yuan XC, Yu WX, He M, Bu J, Cheong WC (2005) Soft-lithography-enabled fabrication of large numerical aperture refractive microlens array in hybrid SiO2–TiO2 sol-gel glass. Appl Phys Lett 86:114102

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank M. Cochet, G. Castellan, and A. Bellemin Comte from CEA-Leti for, respectively, their valuable help on silicon devices fabrication, the SiOC deposition and the profilometer measurements.

Author information

Correspondence to Raphael Renaudot or Vincent Agache.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (WMV 3202 kb)

Supplementary material 1 (WMV 3202 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Renaudot, R., Fouillet, Y., Jalabert, L. et al. Programmable LDEP technology to fabricate versatile master molds for PDMS continuous-flow microfluidic applications. Microfluid Nanofluid 16, 701–710 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-013-1256-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Liquid dielectrophoresis
  • UV glue
  • PDMS replica