Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 829–837 | Cite as

Control of secondary flow in concentrically traveling flow on centrifugal microfluidics

Research Paper

Abstract

This paper reports a fundamental study of the stripe laminar flow pattern on a centrifugal microfluidic device with the goal of realizing a sedimentation-based, continuous mode particle separation technique. Microfluidic channels were designed with a concentrically integrated microchannel, and the patterning of the flow in the channel was investigated. A significant secondary flow was observed as a preliminary result. We conclude that the origin of this secondary flow was not the Dean force, because it was observed in a straight microchannel, but was not observed in curved channel during the spinning of the system at rest. The transition of the pattern was investigated using a simulation and experiment, and the flow pattern’s dependence on the rotational speed was determined, which suggested that the origin of the secondary flow was the Coriolis force. The significance of the secondary flow was controlled by adjusting the rotational speed of the disk, and the flow rate and laminar flow patterns were controlled by the stripe flow pattern.

Keywords

Rotational Speed PDMS Centrifugal Force Secondary Flow Coriolis Force 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a JSPS KAKENHI grant for young scientists. The authors greatly appreciate the comprehensive technical support from Mr. Munenori Uno of the Center for Nano Materials and Technology JAIST in developing the spinning driver and stroboscope system.

Supplementary material

10404_2013_1194_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1176 kb)

References

  1. Carlo DD (2009) Inertial microfluidics. Lab Chip 9:3038–3046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dean WR (1927) Note on the motion of fluid in a curved pipe. Phil Mag 4:208–223MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Ducrée J et al (2006a) Multilamination of flows in planar networks of rotating microchannels. Microfluid Nanofluid 2:78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ducrée J et al (2006b) Patterning of flow and mixing in rotating radial microchannels. Microfluid Nanofluid 2:97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ducrée J et al (2007) The centrifugal microfluidic bio-disk platform. J Micromech Microeng 17:S103–S115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duffy DC et al (1998) Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal Chem 70:4974–4984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duffy DC et al (1999) Microfabricated centrifugal microfluidic systems: characterization and multiple enzymatic assays. Anal Chem 71:4669–4678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grumann M et al (2005) Visualization of flow patterning in high-speed centrifugal microfluidics. Rev Sci Instrum 76:025101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haeberle S et al (2006) Centrifugal extraction of plasma from blood on a rotating disk. Lab Chip 6:776–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haeberle S, Zengerle R, Ducrée J (2007) Centrifugal generation and manipulation of droplet emulsions. Microfluid Nanofluid 3:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huh D et al (2007) Gravity-driven microfluidic particle sorting device with hydrodynamic separation amplification. Anal Chem 79:1369–1376MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kobayashi T et al (2010) Centrifugal separation device based on two-layer laminar flow in microchannels for high-throughput and continuous blood cell/plasma separation. Jpn J Appl Phys 49:077001-1–077001-5Google Scholar
  13. Madou MJ et al (2001) Design and fabrication of CD-like microfluidic platforms for diagnostics: microfluidic functions. Biomed Microdevices 3:245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Morijiri T et al (2011) Sedimentation pinched-flow fractionation for size- and density-based particle sorting in microchannels. Microfluid Nanofluid 11:105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pamme N (2007) Continuous flow separations in microfluidics devices. Lab Chip 7:1644–1659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pertoft H (2000) Fractionation of cells and sub cellular particles with percoll. J Biochem Biophys Methods 44:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Petersson F, Aberg L, Sward NAM, Laurell T (2007) Free flow acoustophoresis: microfluidic-based mode of particle and cell separation. Anal Chem 79:5117–5123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schure MR, Weeratunga SK (1991) Coriolis-induced secondary flow in sedimentation field-flow fractionation. Anal Chem 63:2614–2626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sudarsan AP, Ugaz VM (2007) Multivortex micromixing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:7228–7233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tsutsui H, Ho CM (2009) Cell separation by non-inertial force fields in microfluidic systems. Mech Res Commun 36:92–103CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Ukita Y et al (2012) Stacked centrifugal microfluidic device with three-dimensional microchannel networks and multifunctional capillary bundle structures for immunoassay. Sens Actuators B 166–167:898–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Xia N et al (2006) Combined microfluidic–micromagnetic separation of living cells in continuous flow. Biomed Microdevices 8:299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yamada M, Nakashima M, Seki M (2004) Pinched flow fractionation: continuous size separation of particles utilizing a laminar flow profile in a pinched microchannel. Anal Chem 76:5465–5471CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials ScienceJapan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (JAIST)NomiJapan

Personalised recommendations