Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 14, Issue 1–2, pp 287–298 | Cite as

Simulation-based analysis of micro-robots swimming at the center and near the wall of circular mini-channels

Research Paper

Abstract

Swimming micro-robots have great potential in biomedical applications such as targeted drug delivery, medical diagnosis, and destroying blood clots in arteries. Inspired by swimming microorganisms, micro-robots can move in biofluids with helical tails attached to their bodies. In order to design and navigate micro-robots, hydrodynamic characteristics of the flow field must be understood well. This work presents computational fluid dynamics modeling and analysis of the flow due to the motion of micro-robots that consist of magnetic heads and helical tails inside fluid-filled channels akin to bodily conduits; special emphasis is on the effects of the radial position of the robot. Time-averaged velocities, forces, torques, and efficiency of the micro-robots placed in the channels are analyzed as functions of rotation frequency, helical pitch (wavelength) and helical radius (amplitude) of the tail. Results indicate that robots move faster and more efficiently near the wall than at the center of the channel. Forces acting on micro-robots are asymmetrical due to the chirality of the robot’s tail and its motion. Moreover, robots placed near the wall have a different flow pattern around the head when compared to in-center and unbounded swimmers. According to simulation results, time-averaged forward velocity of the robot agrees well with the experimental values measured previously for a robot with almost the same dimensions.

Keywords

Swimming micro-robots Micro-flows Creeping flows Hydrodynamic interactions Motion of objects in channels 

References

  1. Armitage JP, Macnab RM (1987) Unidirectional, intermittent rotation of the flagellum of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Bacteriol 169(2):514–518Google Scholar
  2. Atsumi T, Maekawa Y, Yamada T, Kawagishi I, Imae Y, Homma M (1996) Effect of viscosity on swimming by the lateral and polar flagella of Vibrio alginolyticus. J Bacteriol 178(16):5024–5026Google Scholar
  3. Berg HC (1993) Random walks in biology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  4. Berke AP, Turner L, Berg HC, Lauga E (2008) Hydrodynamic attraction of swimming microorganisms by surfaces. Phys Rev Lett 101:038102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brennen C, Winet H (1977) Fluid mechanics of propulsion by cilia and flagella. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 9:339–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheang UK, Toy D, Lee JH, Kim MJ (2010) Fabrication and magnetic control of bacteria-inspired robotic microswimmers. Appl Phys Lett 97:213704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. COMSOL-AB (2011) Comsol multiphysics modelling guide. COMSOL, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  8. Dreyfus R, Baudry J, Roper ML, Fermigier M, Stone HA, Bibette J (2005) Microscopic artificial swimmers. Nature 437(6):862–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Erman AG, Yesilyurt S (2011) Swimming of onboard-powered autonomous robots in viscous fluid filled channels. IEEE international conference on mechatronics ICM 2011. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  10. Felderhof BU (2010) Swimming at low Reynolds number of a cylindrical body in a circular tube. Phys Fluids 22:1136041–1136046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghosh A, Fischer P (2009) Controlled propulsion of artificial magnetic nanostructured propellers. Nano Lett 9(6):2243–2245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giacché D, Ishikawa T, Yamaguchi T (2010) Hydrodynamic entrapment of bacteria swimming near a solid surface. Phys Rev E 82:056309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gray J, Hancock G (1955) The propulsion of sea-urchin spermatozoa. J Exp Biol 32:802–814Google Scholar
  14. Happel J, Brenner H (1983) Low Reynolds number hydrodynamics with special applications to particulate media. The Hague and Boston and Hingham, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. Higdon JJ (1979) The hydrodynamics of flagellar propulsion: helical waves. J Fluid Mech 94(2):331–351MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Honda T, Arai KI, Ishiyama K (1996) Micro swimming mechanisms propelled by external magnetic fields. IEEE Trans Magn 32(5):5085–5087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Katz DF, Blake JR, Paveri-Fontana SL (1975) On the movement of slender bodies near plane boundaries at low Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech 72:529–540MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lauga E, Powers TR (2009) The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms. Rep Prog Phys 72:1–36MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lauga E, DiLuzio WR, Whitesides GM, Stone HA (2006) Swimming in circles: motion of bacteria near solid boundaries. Biophys J 90:400–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lighthill SJ (1975) Mathematical biofluid dynamics. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, PhiladelphiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martel S, Felfoul O, Mathieu J-B, Chanu A, Tamaz S, Mohammadi M, Mankiewicz M, Tabatabaei N (2009) MRI-based medical nanorobotic platform for the control of magnetic nanoparticles and flagellated bacteria for target interventions in human capillaries. Int J Robotics Res 28:1169–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nelson BJ, Kaliakatsos IK, Abbott JJ (2010) Microrobots for minimally invasive medicine. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 12:55–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Purcell EM (1976) Life at low Reynolds number. Am J Phys 45(1):3–11MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shum H, Gaffney EA, Smith DJ (2010) Modeling bacterial behaviour close to no-slip plane boundary: the influence of bacterial geometry. Proc R Soc A 466:1725–1748MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Taylor SG (1951) Analysis of the swimming of microscopic organisms. Proc R Soc Lond 209(A):447–461MATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Temel FZ, Yesilyurt S (2011). Magnetically actuated micro swimming of bio-inspired robots in mini channels. IEEE international conference on mechatronics, ICM2011. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang L, Abbott JJ, Dong L, Peyer K, Kratochvil BE, Zhang H et al (2009) Characterization of the swimming properties of artificial bacterial flagella. Nano Lett 9(10):3663–3667CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and Natural SciencesSabanci UniversityTuzla, IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations