Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 345–352 | Cite as

Implantable microfluidic and electronic systems for insect flight manipulation

  • Aram J. Chung
  • Bernardo Cordovez
  • Nipun Jasuja
  • Daniel J. Lee
  • Xinyu Toby Huang
  • David Erickson
Research Paper


Insect micro air vehicles represent a promising alternative to traditional small scale aircraft because they combine the enhanced energy storage and maneuverability of living insects with the controllability offered by microelectromechanical systems. These systems have been previously demonstrated, usually using either electrical (with implanted electrodes) or chemical (with implanted microfluidics) control schemes, but to date little work has been done on the creation of hybrid systems that use both these methods simultaneously. In this paper, we develop an integrated microsystem that uses both chemical and electrical methods to modulate the flight activity of Manduca sexta moths. The integration of two control schemes is essential because it could increase the number of achievable flight routines and duration. The electrical component of the system initiates and maintains flight by applying electrical pulses to an antenna lobe and an implanted drug delivery component modulates flight output power by administering a neurotransmitter dose to the central nervous system. Flight duration results acquired with this system are compared with those obtained from direct mechanical stimulation. We demonstrate that the electrical stimulation provides as much as 35-fold enhancement in flight duration with respect to mechanical agitation and that a 50% mean flight power output reduction can be achieved with the proper neurotransmitter dose.


Microfluidics Drug delivery Insect cyborg Manduca Sexta moth flight control 



The authors would like to thank J. Atchison for his contributions towards the boost converter design, Prof. M. Campbell and Prof. H. Kress-Gazit for access to the VICON system, M. Kalontarov for helpful discussions, Prof. H. Lipson for access to the 3D Acrylic Printer and Dr. M. Ozgur at MEMS Exchange. This work was supported by the DARPA Defense Sciences Office under the HI-MEMS program through the BTI for Plant Research. Distribution unlimited. The facilities used for this research include Cornell Nanoscale Science and Technology Facility (CNF), Nanobiotechnology Center (NBTC) at Cornell University.

Supplementary material

10404_2012_957_MOESM1_ESM.rar (10.5 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (RAR 10736 kb)


  1. Bozkurt A, Gilmour R, Stern D, Lal A (2008) MEMS based bioelectronic neuromuscular interfaces for insect cyborg flight control. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on MEMS, pp 160–163Google Scholar
  2. Bozkurt A, Gilmour RF, Lal A (2009a) Balloon-assisted flight of radio-controlled insect biobots. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56(9):2304–2307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bozkurt A, Gilmour RF, Sinha A, Stern D, Lal A (2009b) Insect–machine interface based neurocybernetics. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56(6):1727–1733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bozkurt A, Lal A, Gilmour R (2009c) Aerial and terrestrial locomotion control of lift assisted insect biobots. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp 2058–2061Google Scholar
  5. Chung AJ, Erickson D (2009) Engineering insect flight metabolics using immature stage implanted microfluidics. Lab Chip 9(5):669–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chung AJ, Huh Y, Erickson D (2009) A robust, electrochemically driven microwell drug delivery system for controlled vasopressin release. Biomed Microdevices 11(4):861–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Claassen DE, Kammer AE (1986) Effects of octopamine, dopamine, and serotonin on production of flight motor output by thoracic ganglia of Manduca Sexta. J Neurobiol 17(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellington CP (1984) The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight.1. the quasi-steady analysis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 305(1122):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Franz MO, Mallot HA (2000) Biomimetic robot navigation. Robot Auton Syst 30(1–2):133–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hedrick TL (2008) Software techniques for two- and three-dimensional kinematic measurements of biological and biomimetic systems. Bioinspir Biomim 3(3):034001–034006Google Scholar
  11. Helm B (2005) Finding land mines by following a bee. Business WeekGoogle Scholar
  12. Jeon YB, Sood R, Jeong Jh, Kim SG (2005) MEMS power generator with transverse mode thin film PZT. Sens Actuators A 122(1):16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnston RM, Levine RB (1996) Crawling motor patterns induced by pilocarpine in isolated larval nerve cords of Manduca sexta. J Neurophysiol 76(5):3178–3195Google Scholar
  14. Lian YS, Shyy W, Viieru D, Zhang BN (2003) Membrane wing aerodynamics for micro air vehicles. Prog Aerosp Sci 39(6–7):425–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McCrea MJ, Heath JE (1971) Dependence of flight on temperature regulation in the moth Manduca Sexta. J Exp Biol 54(2):415–435Google Scholar
  16. Pesavento U, Wang ZJ (2009) Flapping wing flight can save aerodynamic power compared to steady flight. Phys Rev Lett 103(11):118102Google Scholar
  17. Rash LD, Hodgson WC (2002) Pharmacology and biochemistry of spider venoms. Toxicon 40(3):225–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sato H, Berry CW, Peeri Y, Baghoomian E, Casey BE, Lavella G, Vandenbrooks JM, Harrison JF, Maharbiz MM (2009) Remote radio control of insect flight. Front Integr Neurosci 3:24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Skinner WS, Dennis PA, Li JP, Summerfelt RM, Carney RL, Quistad GB (1991) Isolation and Identification of Paralytic Peptides from Hemolymph of the Lepidopteran Insects Manduca Sexta, Spodoptera exigua, and Heliothis virescens. J Biol Chem 266(20):12873–12877Google Scholar
  20. Tanaka M (2007) An industrial and applied review of new MEMS devices features. Microelectron Eng 84(5–8):1341–1344. doi: 10.1016/j.mee.2007.01.232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tsang WM, Stone AL, Aldworth ZN, Hildebrand JG, Daniel TL, Akinwande AI, Voldman J (2010) Flexible split-ring electrode for insect flight biasing using multisite neural stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 57(7):1757–1764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Weinberger S (2008) Defence research: Still in the lead? Nature 451:390–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wickenheiser AM, Reissman T, Wu WJ, Garcia E (2010) Modeling the effects of electromechanical coupling on energy storage through piezoelectric energy harvesting. IEEE-ASME Trans Mechatron 15(3):400–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wood RJ (2008) The first takeoff of a biologically inspired at-scale robotic insect. IEEE Trans Robot 24(2):341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wootton R (2000) Aerodynamics: From insects to microvehicles. Nature 403(6766):144–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ziegler R (1991) Changes in lipid and carbohydrate-metabolism during starvation in adult Manduca sexta. J Comp Physiol B Biochem Syst Environ Physiol 161(2):125–131Google Scholar
  27. Ziegler R, Schulz M (1986) Regulation of carbohydrate-metabolism during flight in Manduca sexta. J Insect Physiol 32(12):997–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aram J. Chung
    • 1
  • Bernardo Cordovez
    • 1
  • Nipun Jasuja
    • 1
  • Daniel J. Lee
    • 1
  • Xinyu Toby Huang
    • 2
  • David Erickson
    • 1
  1. 1.Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations