Advertisement

Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 10, Issue 6, pp 1305–1315 | Cite as

Assessment of microalgae viability employing insulator-based dielectrophoresis

  • Roberto C. Gallo-Villanueva
  • Nadia M. Jesús-Pérez
  • José I. Martínez-López
  • Adriana Pacheco
  • Blanca H. Lapizco-EncinasEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Microscale bioparticle analysis has advanced significantly providing advantages over bench-scale studies such as the use of a reduced amount of sample and reagents, higher sensitivity, faster response, and portability. Insulator-based dielectrophoresis (iDEP) is a microscale technique where particles are driven by polarization effects under a non-uniform electrical field created by the inclusion of insulators between two electrodes. iDEP possesses attractive advantages over traditional electrode-based dielectrophoresis since there is no electrode degradation and manufacture of the device is simpler and economical. This novel and powerful technique has been applied successfully in the manipulation of macromolecules and cells. In this study, differences in dielectric properties (cell membrane conductivity) of viable and non-viable microalgae, Selenastrum capricornutum, were employed to concentrate and separate a mixture of live and dead cells. A microchannel, manufactured in glass and containing an array of cylindrical insulating posts, was employed to dielectrophoretically immobilize and concentrate the mixture of cells employing direct current electric fields. Experiments showed that live cells exhibited a stronger dielectrophoretic response than dead cells, which allowed cell differentiation. Separation and enrichment of viable and non-viable microalgae was achieved in 35 s with a concentration yield of 10.36 and 15.87 times the initial cell concentration, respectively. These results demonstrate the use of iDEP as a technique for rapid assessment of microalgae viability; unveiling the potential of this powerful technique for environmental applications on lab-on-a-chip platforms.

Keywords

Microalgae Viability Dielectrophoresis Microfluidics Selenastrum capricornutum 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by grant CONACYT-CB-2006-53603. The authors are grateful for the financial support provided by Dr. Mario M. Álvarez and Cátedras de Investigación (CAT122 and CAT142) of Tecnológico de Monterrey and support provided by CINVESTAV-Monterrey.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (AVI 10615 kb)

References

  1. Andersen RA (2005) Algal culturing techniques. Elsevier Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett LM, Skulan AJ, Singh AK, Cummings EB, Fiechtner GJ (2005) Dielectrophoretic manipulation of particles and cells using insulating ridges in faceted prism microchannels. Anal Chem 77:6798–6804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradford JA, Buller GM (2010) Dead cell stains in flow cytometry. A comprehensive Analysis, Scientific poster, Molecular Probes-Invitrogen Detection Technologies. http://www.invitrogen.com/etc/medialib/en/filelibrary/cell_tissue_analysis/pdfs.Par.48458.File.dat/P317%20Viability%20Dye%20Poster.pdf. Accessed December 2010
  4. Capasso JM, Cossío BR, Berl T, Rivard CJ, Jiménez C (2003) A colorimetric assay for determination of cell viability in algal cultures. Biolmol Eng 20:133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen KP, Pacheco JR, Hayes MA, Staton SJR (2009) Insulator-based dielectrophoretic separation of small particles in a sawtooth channel. Electrophoresis 30:1441–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng BCH (2000) Miniaturizing power supply system for portable computers by improving heat dissipation therein. United States Patent 6081425, United States, 2000Google Scholar
  7. Cho Y-K, Kim S, Lee K, Park C, Lee J-G, Ko C (2009) Bacteria concentration using a membrane type insulator-based dielectrophoresis in a plastic chip. Electrophoresis 30:3153–3159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cummings EB (2003) Streaming dielectrophoresis for continuous-flow microfluidic devices. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 22:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cummings EB, Singh AK (2003) Dielectrophoresis in microchips containing arrays of insulating posts: theoretical and experimental results. Anal Chem 75:4724–4731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davalos RV, McGraw GJ, Wallow TI, Morales AM, Krafcik KL, Cummings EB, Simmons BA (2008) Performance impact of dynamic surface coatings on polymeric insulator-based dielectrophoretic particle separators. Anal Bioanal Chem 390:847–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Du J-R, Juang Y-J, Wu J-T, Wei H-H (2008) Long-range and superfast trapping of DNA molecules in an ac electrokinetic funnel. Biomicrofluidics 2:044103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garrett DC (2004) Effects of methanol, atrazine, and copper on the ultrastructure of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (Selenastrum capricornutum). PhD Dissertation, University of North Texas, DentonGoogle Scholar
  13. Gascoyne PRC, Vykoukal J (2002) Particle separation by dielectrophoresis. Electrophoresis 23:1973–1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gascoyne P, Mahidol C, Ruchirawat M, Satayavivad J, Watcharasit P, Becker FF (2002) Microsample preparation by dielectrophoresis: isolation of malaria. Lab Chip 2:70–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Graham LE, Wilcox LW (2000) Algae. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoagland RW (1999) Switchmode power supply miniaturization with emphasis on integrated passive components on prefired high performance ceramic substrates. PhD Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, BlacksburgGoogle Scholar
  17. Hubner Y, Hoettges KF, Hughes MP (2003) Water quality test based on dielectrophoretic measurements of fresh water algae Selenastrum capricornutum. J Environ Monit 5:861–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kang Y, Li D, Kalams S, Eid J (2008) DC-Dielectrophoretic separation of biological cells by size. Biomed Microdev 10:243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kang Y, Cetin B, Wu Z, Li D (2009) Continuous particle separation with localized AC-dielectrophoresis using embedded electrodes and an insulating hurdle. Electrochim Acta 54:1715–1720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lapizco-Encinas BH, Rito-Palomares M (2007) Dielectrophoresis for the manipulation of nanobioparticles. Electrophoresis 28:4521–4538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lapizco-Encinas BH, Simmons BA, Cummings EB, Fintschenko Y (2004a) Dielectrophoretic concentration and separation of live and dead bacteria in an array of insulators. Anal Chem 76:1571–1579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lapizco-Encinas BH, Simmons BA, Cummings EB, Fintschenko Y (2004b) Insulator-based dielectrophoresis for the selective concentration and separation of live bacteria in water. Electrophoresis 25:1695–1704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lapizco-Encinas BH, Davalos R, Simmons BA, Cummings EB, Fintschenko Y (2005) An insulator-based (electrodeless) dielectrophoretic concentrator for microbes in water. J Microbiol Methods 62:317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li H, Bashir R (2002) Dielectrophoretic separation and manipulation of live and heat-treated cells of Listeria on microfabricated devices with interdigitated electrodes. Sens Actuator B Chem 86:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li L, Song L (2007) Applicability of the MTT assay for measuring viability of cyanobacteria and algae, specifically for Microcystis aeruginosa (Chroococcales, Cyanobacteria). Phycologia 46:593–599MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Markelova AG, Vladimirova MG, Kuptsova ES (2000) A comparison of cytochemical methods for the rapid evaluation of microalgal viability. Russ J Plant Physiol 47:815–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Markx GH, Huang Y, Zhou XF, Pethig R (1994) Dielectrophoretic characterization and separation of microorganisms. Microbiology-UK 140:585–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Medoro G, Manaresi N, Altomare L, Leonardi A, Tartagni M, Guerrieri R (2002) In: Proceedings of the 16th European conference on solid-state transducers (Eurosensors XVI), vol 1, pp 47–51, Prague, Czech Republic, September, 2002Google Scholar
  29. Moncada-Hernández H, Lapizco-Encinas BH (2010) Simultaneous concentration and separation of microorganisms: insulator-based dielectrophoretic approach. Anal Bioanal Chem 396:1805–1816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mukhopadhyay P, Rajesh M, Batkai S, Kashiwaya Y, Hasko G, Liaudet L, Szabo C, Pacher P (2009) Role of superoxide, nitric oxide, and peroxynitrite in doxorubicin-induced cell death in vivo and in vitro. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 296:H1466–H1483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pethig R, Markx GH (1997) Applications of dielectrophoresis in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 15:426–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pohl HA (1951) The motion and precipitation of suspensoids in divergent electric fields. J Appl Phys 22:869–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pohl HA (1978) Dielectrophoresis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Pohl HA, Kaler K (1979) Continuous dielectrophoretic separation of cell mixtures. Cell Biochem Biophys 1:15–28Google Scholar
  35. Pouneva I (1997) Evaluation of algal culture viability and physiological state by fluorescent microscopic methods. Bulg J Plant Physiol 23:67–76Google Scholar
  36. Pysher MD, Hayes MA (2007) Electrophoretic and dielectrophoretic field gradient technique for separating bioparticles. Anal Chem 79:4552–4557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Raja R, Hemaiswarya S, Kumar NA, Sridhar S, Rengasamy R (2008) A perspective on the biotechnological potential of microalgae. Crit Rev Microbiol 34:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rousselet J, Markx GH, Pethig R (1998) Separation of erythrocytes and latex beads by dielectrophoretic levitation and hyperlayer field-flow fractionation. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 140:209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sabounchi P, Huber DE, Kanouff MP, Harris AE, Simmons BA (2008) In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on miniaturized systems for chemistry and life sciences (MicroTAS 2008), vol 1, pp 50–52, San Diego CA, 12–16 October 2008Google Scholar
  40. Sabounchi P, Morales AM, Ponce P, Lee LP, Simmons BA, Davalos R (2008b) Sample concentration and impedance detection on a microfluidic polymer chip. Biomed Microdev 10:661–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sato M, Murata Y, Mizusawa M, Iwahashi H, Oka S (2004) A simple and rapid dual-fluorescence viability assay for microalgae. Microbiol Cult Coll 20:53–59Google Scholar
  42. Schork MA, Remington RD (2000) Statistics with applications to the biological and health sciences. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  43. Simmons BA, McGraw GJ, Davalos RV, Fiechtner GJ, Fintschenko Y, Cummings EB (2006) The development of polymeric devices as dielectrophoretic separators and concentrators. MRS Bull 31:120–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Suehiro J, Hamada R, Noutomi D, Shutou M, Hara M (2003a) Selective detection of viable bacteria using dielectrophoretic impedance measurement method. J Electrostat 57:157–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Suehiro J, Zhou GB, Imamura M, Hara M (2003b) Dielectrophoretic filter for separation and recovery of biological cells in water. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 39:1514–1521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Urdaneta M, Smela E (2007) Multiple frequency dielectrophoresis. Electrophoresis 28:3145–3155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. USEPA (1996) Ecological effects test guidelines: OPPTS 850.5400 Algal toxicity, tiers I and II. United States Environmental Protection Agency document EPA712-C-96-164, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  48. Voldman J (2006) Electrical forces for microscale cell manipulation. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 8:425–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wanichapichart P, Bunthawin S, Kaewpaiboon A, Kanchanapoom K (2002) Determination of cell dielectric properties using dielectrophoretic technique. ScienceAsia 28:113–119. http://www.scienceasia.org/ Google Scholar
  50. Washizu M, Kurosawa O (1990) Electrostatic manipulation of DNA in microfabricated structures. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 26:1165–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Whitesides GM (2006) The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442:368–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wu Y, Huang C, Wang L, Miao X, Xing W, Cheng J (2005) Electrokinetic system to determine differences of electrorotation and traveling-wave electrophoresis between autotrophic and heterotrophic algal cells. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 262:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto C. Gallo-Villanueva
    • 1
  • Nadia M. Jesús-Pérez
    • 1
  • José I. Martínez-López
    • 1
  • Adriana Pacheco
    • 1
  • Blanca H. Lapizco-Encinas
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Cátedra Biomems y Departamento de Agrobiotecnología y AgronegociosTecnológico de MonterreyMonterreyMéxico
  2. 2.Microscale Bioseparations LaboratoryCentro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN Unidad MonterreyApodacaMexico

Personalised recommendations