Advertisement

Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 355–365 | Cite as

3D3C velocimetry measurements of an electrothermal microvortex using wavefront deformation PTV and a single camera

  • Aloke Kumar
  • Christian Cierpka
  • Stuart J. Williams
  • Christian J. Kähler
  • Steven T. Wereley
Research Paper

Abstract

We study the three-dimensional fluid transport in an electrothermal microvortex (EMV), by using wavefront deformation particle-tracking velocimetry (PTV) developed at Universität der Bundeswehr München. By using a cylindrical lens in conjunction with a microscope objective lens, systematic wavefront deformations in the particle images are created. The particles are observed by a single camera and appear as ellipses. The elliptical nature of the particle images encodes out-of-plane information regarding the particle’s position. This new technique is ideally suited for measuring transport in the EMV and provides full three-dimensional, time-resolved particle trajectories with Lagrangian velocity and acceleration. Measurements reveal the toroidal nature of the EMV and the experimentally obtained velocities are used to validate a simplistic model, which describes the interaction between the applied laser illumination and the microfluidic device. The model allows one to conduct numerical simulations of the complex fluid transport in the EMV.

Keywords

Vortex Particle Image Velocimetry Particle Image Axial Velocity Tracer Particle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

A. Kumar acknowledges support from the Bilsland Dissertation and the Josephine De Kármán Fellowships. Financial support from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) in frame of the priority program SPP 1147 is gratefully acknowledged by C. Cierpka.

Supplementary material

10404_2010_674_MOESM1_ESM.mpg (4.3 mb)
Supplementary Movie 1: Tracer particles undergo three-dimensional motion. Video is real time. Supplementary material 1 (MPG 4440 kb)

References

  1. Chen S, Angarita-Jaimes N et al (2009) Wavefront sensing for three-component three-dimensional flow velocimetry in microfluidics. Exp Fluids 47(4–5):849–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Choi Y, Lee S (2010) Holographic analysis of three-dimensional inertial migration of spherical particles in micro-scale pipe flow. Microfluid Nanofluid. doi: 10.1007/s10404-101-0601-8
  3. Cierpka C, Weier T, Gerbeth G (2008) Evolution of vortex structures in an electromagnetically excited separated flow. Exp Fluids 45(5):943–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cierpka C, Hain R, Kähler CJ (2009) Theoretical and experimental investigation of micro wavefront-deformation particle tracking velocimetry. In: 8th international symposium on particle image velocimetry—PIV09 2009, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  5. Cierpka C, Rossi M, Segura R, Kähler CJ (2010a) Comparative study of the uncertainty of stereoscopic micro-PIV, wavefront-deformation micro-PTV, and standard micro-PIV. In: International symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics (LISBON2010), Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  6. Cierpka C, Segura R, Hain R, Kähler CJ (2010b) A simple single camera 3C3D velocity measurement technique without errors due to depth of correlation and spatial averaging for microfluidics. Meas Sci Technol 21(4):045401.1–045401.13Google Scholar
  7. Green NG, Ramos A, Gonzalez A, Castellanos A, Morgan H (2000) Electric field induced fluid flow on microelectrodes: the effect of illumination. J Phys D 33(2):L13–L17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Green NG, Ramos A, Gonzalez A, Castellanos A, Morgan H (2001) Electrothermally induced fluid flow on microelectrodes. J Electrost 53(2):71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hain R, Kähler CJ (2006) Single camera volumetric velocity measurements using optical aberrations. In: 12th international symposium on flow visualization, Gottingen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  10. Hain R, Kähler CJ, Radespiel R (2009) Principles of a volumetric velocity measurement technique based on optical abberations. Notes on numerical fluid mechanics and multidisciplinary design. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  11. Kumar A, Williams SJ, Wereley ST (2009) Experiments on opto-electrically generated microfluidic vortices. Microfluid Nanofluid 6(5):637–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kumar A, Chuang H, Wereley ST (2010a) Dynamic manipulation by light and electric fields: micrometer particles to microliter droplets. Langmuir 26(11):7656–7660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kumar A, Kwon J-S et al (2010b) Optically modulated electrokinetic manipulation and concentration of colloidal particles near an electrode surface. Langmuir 26(7):5262–5272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee SJ, Kim S (2009) Advanced particle-based velocimetry techniques for microscale flows. Microfluid Nanofluid 6(5):577–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lindken R, Westerweel J, Wieneke B (2006) 3D micro-scale velocimetry methods: a comparison between 3D-μPTV, stereoscopic μPIV and tomographic μPIV. In: 13th International symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindken R, Rossi M, Grosse S, Westerweel J (2009) Micro-particle image velocimetry (mu PIV): recent developments, applications, and guidelines. Lab Chip 9(17):2551–2567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Malik NA, Dracos T, Papantoniou DA (1993) Particle tracking velocimetry in 3-dimensional flows. Part 2. Particle tracking. Exp Fluids 15(4–5):279–294Google Scholar
  18. Mizuno A, Nishioka M, Ohno Y, Dascalescu LD (1995) Liquid microvortex generated around a laser focal point in an intense high-frequency electric-field. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 31(3):464–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morgan H, Green NG (2003) AC electrokinetics: colloids and nanoparticles. Research Studies Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  20. Peterson SD, Chuang HS, Wereley ST (2008) Three-dimensional particle tracking using micro-particle image velocimetry hardware. Meas Sci Technol 19(11):115406.1–115406.8Google Scholar
  21. Ragan T, Huang HD, So P, Gratton E (2006) 3D particle tracking on a two-photon microscope. J Fluoresc 16(3):325–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Satake S, Kunugi T, Sato K, Ito T, Taniguchi J (2005) Three-dimensional flow tracking in a micro channel with high time resolution using micro digital-holographic particle-tracking velocimetry. Opt Rev 12(6):442–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sheng J, Malkiel E, Katz J (2006) Digital holographic microscope for measuring three-dimensional particle distributions and motions. Appl Opt 45(16):3893–3901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stolz W, Kohler J (1994) Inplane determination of 3D-velocity vectors using particle tracking anemometry (PTA). Exp Fluids 17(1–2):105–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Willert CE, Gharib M (1992) 3-dimensional particle imaging with a single camera. Exp Fluids 12(6):353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Williams SJ (2009) Optically induced, AC electrokinetic manipulation of colloids. Mechanical Engineering. West Lafayette, Purdue University. DoctoralGoogle Scholar
  27. Williams SJ, Kumar A, Wereley ST (2008a) Electrokinetic patterning of colloidal particles with optical landscapes. Lab Chip 8(11):1879–1882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Williams SJ, Kumar A, Wereley ST (2008b) Optically induced electrokinetic patterning and manipulation of particles. http://hdl.handle.net/1813/11399
  29. Williams SJ, Kumar A, Green NG, Wereley ST (2010) Optically induced electrokinetic concentration and sorting of colloids. Micromech Microeng 20:015022Google Scholar
  30. Yang CT, Chuang HS (2005) Measurement of a microchamber flow by using a hybrid multiplexing holographic velocimetry. Exp Fluids 39(2):385–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yoon SY, Kim K (2006) 3D particle position and 3D velocity field measurement in a microvolume via the defocusing concept. Meas Sci Technol 17(11):2897–2905 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aloke Kumar
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christian Cierpka
    • 3
  • Stuart J. Williams
    • 4
  • Christian J. Kähler
    • 3
  • Steven T. Wereley
    • 1
  1. 1.Birck Nanotechnology Center, School of Mechanical EngineeringPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.Biosciences DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA
  3. 3.Institut für Strömungsmechanik und AerodynamikUniversität der Bundeswehr MünchenNeubibergGermany
  4. 4.School of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations