Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 9, Issue 4–5, pp 855–864 | Cite as

Cost-effective and reliable sealing method for PDMS (PolyDiMethylSiloxane)-based microfluidic devices with various substrates

Research Paper

Abstract

A cost-effective and simply handling bonding method using siloxane-based adhesion promoter is introduced to increase the adhesion strength between cured PDMS and various substrates. The working mechanism of adhesion promoters is based on post-cure reaction in PDMS curing and they have similar chemistry compositions with PDMS prepolymers. It is experimentally investigated and proved that the adhesion strength of the resulted interface depends on –SiH group and Pt catalyst in adhesion promoters and molecular structures and polarity of substrates surfaces. By modifying their compositions uniform and perfect adhesion can be obtained for different substrates and meet different markets requirements, e.g., PDMS and glass which could be applied for biology, chemistry and solar cell fields, FR4 for electronics field and copper for electronics and thermal cooling fields, etc. Also, considering the quality and reliability requirements from potential application markets of microfluidic devices an environmental test procedure is summarized and according to the defined procedure, the environmental stability of realized PDMS-based microfluidic devices with different substrates has been tested with the result that they exhibited excellent stabilities and suitability for mass production.

Keywords

Polydimethylsiloxane Adhesion Sealing Surface adhesion promoter Microfluidic Environmental stability 

References

  1. Armani D, Liu C (2000) Re-configurable fluid circuits By PDMS elastomer micromachining. J Micromech Microeng 10:80–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auroux P-A, Iossifidis D, Reyes DR, Manz A (2002) Micro total analysis system Ι: introduction, theory and technology. Anal Chem 74:2637–2652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balslev S, Jorgensen AM, Bilenberg B, Mogensen KB, Snakenborg D, Geschke O, Kutter JP, Kristensen A (2006) Lab-on-a-chip with integrated optical transducers. Lab Chip 6:213–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai DK (2008) Optical and mechanical aspects on polysiloxane based electrical optical circuits board. Ph.D Thesis, Technical University of DortmundGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai DK, Neyer A (2007) Realization of electrical-optical-circuit-board self-packaging. In: Proceedings on 57th electronic components and technology conference, 2007, pp. 1368–1374, Reno, Nevada, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. Cai DK, Neyer A (in press a) Polysiloxane based flexible electrical-optical-circuits-board. Microelectron EngGoogle Scholar
  7. Cai DK, Neyer A (in press b) Raman, mid-infrared, near-infrared and ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy of PDMS silicone rubber for characterization of polymer optical waveguide materials. J Mol StructGoogle Scholar
  8. Cai DK, Neyer A (submitted) PolyDiMethylSiloxane (PDMS) based optical interconnect packaged with FR4Google Scholar
  9. Cai DK, Neyer A, Kuckuk R, Heise HM (2008) Optical absorption in transparent PDMS materials applied for multimode waveguides fabrication. Opt Mater 30:1157–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dokmeci M, Najafi K (2001) Liquid crystal polymer (LCP) for MEMS: processes and applications. J Microelectromech Syst 10(2):197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duffy DC, McDonald JC, Schueller OJA, Whitesides GM (1998) Rapid prototyping microfluidics systems in poly(dimetylsiloxane). Anal Chem 70:4974–4984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eddings MA, Johnson MA, Gale BK (2008) Determining the optimal PDMS–PDMS bonding technique for microfluidic devices. J Micromech Microeng 18:067001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ginn BT, Steinbock O (2003) Polymer surface modification using microwave-oven-generated plasma. Langmuir 19:8117–8118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giorgi G (2004) A theoretical investigation of the Chalk-Harrod and modified Chalk-Harrod mechanisms involved in hybrid integrated circuit building. Comput Chem Mol Dyn 20(5):781–791Google Scholar
  15. Harrison DJ, Fluri K, Seiler K, Fan Z, Effenhauser CS, Manz A (1993) Micromachining a miniaturized capillary electrophoresis-based chemical analysis system on a chip. Science 261(5123):895–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haubert K, Drier T, Beebe D (2006) PDMS bonding by means of a portable, low-cost corona system. Lab Chip 6:1548–1549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jo BH, Van Lerberghe LM, Motsegood KM, Beebe DJ (2000) Three-dimensional micro-channel fabrication in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomer. J Microelectromech Syst 9:76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kilby JS (2000) The electrical century: the integrated circuit’s early history. Proc IEEE 88:109–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klank H, Kutter JP, Geschke O (2002) CO2-laser micromachining and back-end processing for rapid production of pmma-based microfluidic systems. Lab Chip 2:242–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kovacs GT (1998) Micromachined transducers sourcebook. WCB/McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Madou MJ (2001) Fundamentals of microfabrication: the science of miniaturization. CRC Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Mainz A, Becker H (1998) Microsystem technology in chemistry sciences, Topics in current chemistry, vol 194. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, GermanyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manz A, Graber N, Widmer HM (1990) Miniaturized total chemical analysis systems: a novel concept for chemical sensing. Sens Actuators B 1:244–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Manz A, Harrison DJ, Verpoorte EMJ, Fettinger JC, Paulus A, Ludi H, Widmer HM (1992) Planar chips technology for miniaturization and integration of separation techniques into monitoring systems: capillary electrophoresis on a chip. J Chromatogr A 593(1–2):253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McDonald J, Duffy D, Anderson J, Chiu D, Wu H, Schueller O, Whitesides GM (2000) Fabrication of microfluidic systems in polydimethylsiloxane. Electrophoresis 21:27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mogensen K, El-Ali J, Wolff A, Kutter J (2003) Integration of polymer waveguides for optical detection in microfabricated chemical analysis systems. Appl Opt 42(19):4072–4079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Petersen K (1982) Dynamic micromechanics on silicon: techniques and devices. Proc IEEE 70(5):420–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reichmuth DS, Shepodd TJ, Kirby BJ (2004) On-chip high-pressure picoliter injector for pressure-driven flow through porous media. Anal Chem 76:5063–5068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reyes DR, Iossifidis D, Auroux P-A, Manz A (2002) Micro total analysis systems. 1. Introduction, theory, and technology. Anal Chem 74:2623–2636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sakaki S (2004) Theoretical study of reaction mechanism of hydrosilylation reactions. Keiso Kagaku Kyokaishi 1(20):4–9Google Scholar
  31. Samel B, Chowdhury M, Stemme G (2007) The fabrication of microfluidic structures by means of full-wafer adhesive bonding using a poly(dimethylsiloxane) catalyst. J Micromech Microeng 17:1710–1714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shigeyoshi S, Mizoe N, Sugimoto M (1998) Theoretical study of platinum(0)-catalyzed hydrosilylation of ethylene. Chalk–Harrod mechanism or modified Chalk–Harrod mechanism. Organometallics 17(12):2510–2523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shoji S, Esashi M (1994) Microflow devices and systems. J Micromech Microeng 4:157–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Simpson T, Parbhoo B, Keddie JL (2003) The dependence of the rate of crosslinking in poly(dimethyl siloxane) on the thickness of coatings. Polymer 44:4829–4838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sofla A, Martinb C (2010) A vapor-assisted method for adhering polydimethylsiloxane and glass. Lab Chip 10:250–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Venter JC et al (2004) Sequence of the human genome. Science 291:1304–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vilkner T, Janasek D, Manz A (2004) Micro total analysis systems. Recent developments. Anal Chem 76:3373–3386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang X, Engel J, Liu C (2003) Liquid crystal polymer (LCP) for MEMS: processes and applications. J Micromech Microeng 13:628–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xia Y, Whitesides GM (1998) Soft lithography. Angew Chem Int Ed 37(5):550–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technische Universität Dortmund, Fakultät für Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, Arbeitsgebiet Mikrostrukturtechnik (AG MST)DortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations