Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 9, Issue 2–3, pp 447–459 | Cite as

Detecting molecular separation in nano-fluidic channels through velocity analysis of temporal image sequences by multivariate curve resolution

  • Kateryna Artyushkova
  • Anthony L. Garcia
  • Gabriel P. Lõpez
Research Paper


In this study, we report on a method of determining individual velocities of molecular species being separated in a fluid medium within array of nanofluidic channels that can be useful in the detection of molecular species. The method is based on the application of multivariate image analysis methods, in this case principal component analysis and multivariate curve resolution, to temporal image series capturing multiple species moving through the medium. There are two novel and unique advantages of the reported method. First, it is possible to identify transport velocities of different molecular species, even those tagged with the same fluorophore. And second, the velocity determination can be made before there is any visual separation of the species in the medium at the very initial stages of separation. The capability of the methodology to detect the separation of species without fluorescent labeling and to provide an accurate ratio of their velocities even at the very early pre-visual stage of separation will significantly optimize separation experiments and assist in fast and accurate detection of analytes based on micro- and nano-fluidics assays. The presented method can be practiced in connection with various molecular separation techniques including, but not limited to, nanochannel electrophoresis, microchannel capillary electrophoresis, and gel electrophoresis.


Nanofluidics Flow visualization Velocimetry Multivariate image analysis Multivariate curve resolution (MCR) 



This study was supported by the Center for Biomedical Engineering (CBME) at UNM, NM DTRA HDTRA1-06-CWMDBR and NSF Sensors CTS-0332315.


  1. Adams MJ (1995) Chemometrics in analytical spectroscopy. Royal Society of Chemistry, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Artyushkova K, Lopez GP, Bore M. Method for multivariate image analysis of confocal temporal image sequences for velocity estimation. US patent US20090148001Google Scholar
  3. Bellan LM, Craighead HG, Hinestroza JP (2007) Direct measurement of fluid velocity in an electrospinning jet using particle image velocimetry. J Appl Phys 102(9):094308-1–094308-5Google Scholar
  4. Bergsma CBJ et al (2001) Velocity estimation of spots in three-dimensional confocal image sequences of living cells. Cytometry 43(4):261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Juan A et al (2004) Spectroscopic imaging and chemometrics: a powerful combination for global and local sample analysis. TRAC Trends Anal Chem 23(1):70–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dittrich PS, Schwille P (2002) Spatial two-photon fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy for controlling molecular transport in microfluidic structures. Anal Chem 74(17):4472–4479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eigenvector Research, I., PLS_Toolbox 4.3Google Scholar
  8. Garcia AL et al (2005) Electrokinetic molecular separation in nanoscale fluidic channels. Lab Chip 5(11):1271–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grega L et al (2007) Flow characterization of a polymer electronic membrane fuel cell manifold and individual cells using particle image velocimetry. J Fuel Cell Sci Technol 4(3):272–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gurden SP et al (2003) Analysis of video images from a gas-liquid transfer experiment: a comparison of PCA and PARAFAC for multivariate image analysis. J Chemometr 17(7):400–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Horn BKP, Schunck BG (1993) Determining optical flow—a retroscpective. Artif Intell 59(1–2):81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jaumot J, Vives M, Gargallo R (2004) Application of multivariate resolution methods to the study of biochemical and biophysical processes. Anal Biochem 327(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lowry M, He Y, Geng L (2002) Imaging solute distribution in capillary electrochromatography with laser scanning confocal microscopy. Anal Chem 74:1811–1818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Malinowski ER (1991) Factor analysis in chemistry. Wiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Markov DA et al (2004) Noninvasive fluid flow measurements in microfluidic channels with backscatter interferometry. Electrophoresis 25(21–22):3805–3809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MATLAB: The Language of Technical Computing. The Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MAGoogle Scholar
  17. Natrajan VK, Christensen KT (2007) Microscopic particle image velocimetry measurements of transition to turbulence in microscale capillaries. Exp Fluids 43(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oh YJ et al (2009) Effect of wall-molecule interactions on electrokinetic transport of charged molecules in nanofluidic channels during FET flow control. Lab Chip 9(11):1601–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Petsev DN (2005) Theory of transport in nanofluidic channels with moderately thin electrical double layers: effect of the wall potential modulation on solutions of symmetric and asymmetric electrolytes. J Chem Phys 123(24):244907-1–244907-12Google Scholar
  20. Sahouria E, Zakhor A (1999) Content analysis of video using principal components. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Technol 9(8):1290–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sinton D (2004) Microscale flow visualization. Microfluid Nanofluid 1(1):2–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tagliasacchi M (2007) A genetic algorithm for optical flow estimation. Image Vis Comput 25(2):141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tauler R, Smilde A, Kowalski B (1995) Selectivity, local rank, 3-way data-analysis and ambiguity in multivariate curve resolution. J Chemometr 9(1):31–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Windig W, Guilment J (1991) Interactive self-modeling mixture analysis. Anal Chem 63(14):1425–1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yuan Z et al (2007) Electrokinetic transport and separations in fluidic nanochannels. Electrophoresis 28(4):595–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kateryna Artyushkova
    • 1
  • Anthony L. Garcia
    • 2
  • Gabriel P. Lõpez
    • 1
  1. 1.Chemical and Nuclear Engineering DepartmentThe University of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA
  2. 2.Sandia National LaboratoriesAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations