Development of an ultrafast quantitative heterogeneous immunoassay on pre-functionalized poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic chips for the next-generation immunosensors

  • Peng Li
  • Assem Abolmaaty
  • Christine D’Amore
  • Stefanie Demming
  • Constantine Anagnostopoulos
  • Mohammad Faghri
Short Communication

Abstract

Although the reaction time for antigen-antibody binding has been greatly reduced in microchannels, other processes in heterogeneous immunoassays (HEIs), such as blocking and antigen adsorption have not benefited from miniaturization as a reduction in size to micro dimensions does not increase the speed of these processes significantly. The overall assay time of reported microfluidic HEIs has continued to be limited by these processes. In this study, we successfully develop an ultrafast quantitative HEI with pre-functionalized microfluidic poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) chips. The protein A functionalized PDMS surface is found to be highly effective in reducing the antigen adsorption time in microchannels. The functionalized surfaces can be stable at least for 2.5 months when stored at 4°C in a buffer solution consisting of 10 mM Tris, 0.05% bovine serum albumin, 0.05% Proclin 300, and 5% glycerol. In addition, the immunosorption process, which is substantially accelerated in micro scale, results in a significant reduction in nonspecific binding. The time of blocking step can therefore be reduced to a minimum or can be eliminated. The overall assay for detecting bovine immunoglobulin G is completed in 19 min with a limit of detection of 3.8 nM. The ultrafast analysis time and superior sensitivity demonstrated by this microfluidic HEI is promising for being used to develop the next-generation immunosensors.

Keywords

Microfluidics Heterogeneous immunoassay Analysis time reduction Functionalized poly(dimethylsiloxane) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF-OISE-0530203) and the NSF EPSCoR Fellowship (to P. Li). We gratefully thank Prof. Stephanus Büttgenbach at the Institute for Microtechnology of Technical University of Braunschweig for helpful research collaborations, Paul W. Johnson at the RI Genomics and Sequencing Center for his excellent technical assistance with the fluorescence imaging, and Kurt Broderick at the Microsystems Technology Laboratories of Massachusetts Institute of Technology for his valuable technical assistance with the microfluidic chip fabrication.

References

  1. Bange A, Halsall HB, Heineman WR (2005) Microfluidic immunosensor systems. Biosens Bioelectron 20:2488–2503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Delehanty JB, Ligler FS (2002) A microarray immunoassay for simultaneous detection of proteins and bacteria. Anal Chem 74:5681–5687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Devi KRU, Ramalingam B, Brennan PJ, Narayanan PR, Raja A (2001) Specific and early detection of IgG, IgA and IgM antibodies to Mycobacterium tuberculosis 38 kDa antigen in pulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 81:249–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dittrich PS, Manz A (2006) Lab-on-a-chip: microfluidics in drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5:210–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dodge A, Fluri K, Verpoote E, Rooij NF (2001) Electrokinetically driven microfluidic chips with surface-modified chambers for heterogeneous immunoassays. Anal Chem 73:3400–3409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duffy DC, McDonald JC, Schueller OJA, Whitesides GM (1998) Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal Chem 70:4974–4984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eteshola E, Leckband D (2001) Development and characterization of an ELISA assay in PDMS microfluidic channels. Sens Actuators B 72:129–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fintschenko Y, Wilson GS (1998) Flow injection immunoassay: a review. Mikrochim Acta 129:7–18Google Scholar
  9. Growther JR (2001) The ELISA guidebook. Humana Press, TotowaGoogle Scholar
  10. Hage DS, Thomas DH, Beck MS (1993) Theory of a sequential addition competitive binding immunoassay based on high-performance immunoaffinity chromatography. Anal Chem 65:1622–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hashida S, Hashinaka K, Nishikata I, Oka S, Shimada K, Saito A, Takamizawa A, Shinagawa H, Ishikawa E (1996) Shortening of the window period in diagnosis of HIV-1 infection by simultaneous detection of p24 antigen and antibody IgG to p17 and reverse transcriptase in serum with ultrasensitive enzyme immunoassay. J Virol Meth 62:43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herr AE, Hatch AV, Throckmorton DJ, Tran HM, Brennan JS, Giannobile WV, Singh AK (2007) Microfluidic immunoassays as rapid saliva-based clinical diagnostics. PNAS 104:5268–5273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu G, Gao Y, Sherman PM, Li D (2005) A microfluidic chip for heterogeneous immunoassay using electrokinetic control. Microfluid Nanofluid 1:346–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lai S, Wang S, Luo J, Lee LJ, Yang S, Madou MJ (2004) Design of a compact disk-like microfluidic platform for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Anal Chem 76:1832–1837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Linder V, Verpoorte E, Rooij NF, Sigrist H, Thormann W (2002) Application of surface biopassivated disposable poly(dimethylsiloxane)/glass chips to a heterogeneous competitive human serum immunoglobulin G immunoassay with incorporated internal standard. Electrophoresis 23:740–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lion N, Reymond F, Girault HH, Rossier JS (2004) Why the move to microfluidics for protein analysis? Curr Opin Biotechnol 15:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Makamba H, Kim JH, Lim K, Park N, Hahn JH (2003) Surface modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) microchannels. Electrophoresis 24:3607–3619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marquette CA, Blum LJ (2006) State of the art and recent advances in immunoanalytical systems. Biosens Bioelectron 21:1424–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meagher RJ, Hatch AV, Renzi RF, Singh AK (2008) An integrated microfluidic platform for sensitive and rapid detection of biological toxins. Lab Chip 8:2046–2053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Myers FB, Lee LP (2008) Innovations in optical microfluidic technologies for point-of-care diagnostics. Lab Chip 8:2015–2031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rossier JS, Gokulrangan G, Girault HH, Svojanovsky S, Wilson GS (2000) Characterization of protein adsorption and immunosorption kinetics in photoablated polymer microchannels. Langmuir 16:8489–8494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Salim M, O’Sullivan B, McArthur SL, Wright PC (2007) Characterization of fibrinogen adsorption onto glass microcapillary surfaces by ELISA. Lab Chip 7:64–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weibel DB, Siegel AC, Lee A, George AH, Whitesides GM (2007) Pumping fluids in microfluidic systems using the elastic deformation of poly(dimethylsiloxane). Lab Chip 7:1832–1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peng Li
    • 1
  • Assem Abolmaaty
    • 2
  • Christine D’Amore
    • 3
  • Stefanie Demming
    • 4
  • Constantine Anagnostopoulos
    • 1
  • Mohammad Faghri
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied MechanicsUniversity of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA
  2. 2.Food Science Department, Faculty of AgricultureAin Shams UniversityCairoEgypt
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA
  4. 4.Institute for MicrotechnologyTechnical University of BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany

Personalised recommendations