Advertisement

Coupled solid (FVM)–fluid (DSMC) simulation of micro-nozzle with unstructured-grid

  • Zhi-Xin Sun
  • Zeng-Yao Li
  • Ya-Ling He
  • Wen-Quan TaoEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

The flow field and temperature distributions of free molecular micro-electro-thermal resist jet (FMMR) were studied resorting to DSMC–FVM coupled method. Direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) method is the most useful tool to simulate the flow field of FMMR and unstructured grid is suitable for the flow simulation in a complicated region with tilted wall surface. DSMC code based on unstructured grid system was developed and the result was compared with that of structured grid and analytical solution to validate the reliability of the developed code. The DSMC method was then used to simulate the fluid flow in the micro-nozzle (Kn > 0.01) and the temperature distribution in the nozzle wall was obtained by the finite volume method (FVM). The Dirichlet–Neumann method was used to couple the wall heat flux and temperature between flow field and solid area. The effect of different income pressure was studied in detail and the results showed that the temperature of solid area changed drastically at different income pressure, so the commonly-adopted method of pre-setting boundary temperature before simulation was unreasonable.

Keywords

FVM–DSMC coupled method Unstructured-grid FMMR 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The present work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (50636050) and the Foundation for Authors of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of China (No. 200436).

References

  1. Ahmed Z, Gimelshein S, Ketsdever A (2005) Numerical analysis of free molecule micro-resistojet performance. AIAA Paper 2005-4262Google Scholar
  2. Alexander F, Garcia A, Alder B (1998) Cell size dependence of transport coefficients in stochastic particle algorithms. Phys Fluids 10(6):1540–1542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander F, Garcia A, Alder B (2000) Erratum: “cell size dependence of transport coefficients in stochastic particle algorithms”. Phys Fluids 12(3):731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexeenko A, Levin D, Fedosov D, Gimelshein G (2005) Performance analysis of microthrusters based on coupled thermal-fluid modeling and simulation. J Propuls Power 21(1):95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alexeenko A, Fedosov D, Gimelshein S, Levin D, Collins R (2006) Transient heat transfer and gas flow in a MEMS-based thruster. J Microelectromech Syst 15(1):181–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arkilic A, Schmidt M, Breuer K (1997) Gaseous slip flow in long microchannels. J Microelectromech Syst 6(2):167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bird G (1994) Molecular gas dynamics and the direct simulation of gas flows. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Bird G (2007) Sophisticated DSMC, Notes prepared for a short course at the DSMC07 meeting Santa Fe, September 30, 2007Google Scholar
  9. Gimelshein S, Markelov G, Lilly T, Selden N, Ketsdever A (2005) Experimental and numerical modeling of rarefied gas flows through orifices and short tubes. In: 24th international symposium on rarefied gas dynamics, pp 437–443Google Scholar
  10. Lilly T, Gimelshein S, Ketsdever A, Markelov G (2006) Measurements and computations of mass flow and momentum flux through short tubes in rarefied gases. Phys Fluids 18:093601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liou W, Fang Y (2000) Implicit boundary conditions for direct simulation Monte Carlo method in MEMS flow predictions. Comput Model Eng Sci 1(4):119–128Google Scholar
  12. Liu M, Zhang X, Zhang G, Chen Y (2006) Study on micronozzle flow and propulsion performance using DSMC and continuum methods. Acta Mech Sin 22:409–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nicolas G, Hadjiconstantinou NG (2000) Analysis of discretization in the direct simulation Monte Carlo. Phys Fluids 12(10):2634–2638Google Scholar
  14. Tsien H (1946) Superaerodynamics, the mechanics of rarefied gas. J Aeronaut Sci 13:653–664Google Scholar
  15. Wang M, Li Z (2004) Simulations for gas flows in microgeometries using the direct simulation Monte Carlo method. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 25:975–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wong J, Ketsdever A, Reed H (2003) Numerical modeling of the free molecule micro-resistojet prototype and next generation designs evaluation. AIAA Paper 2003-3581Google Scholar
  17. Xie C (2007) Characteristics of micronozzle gas flows. Phys Fluids 19:037102CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhi-Xin Sun
    • 1
  • Zeng-Yao Li
    • 1
  • Ya-Ling He
    • 1
  • Wen-Quan Tao
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, School of Energy and Power EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations