Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 189–202 | Cite as

Effect of ionic concentration on electrokinetic instability in a cross-shaped microchannel

Research Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

This paper performs numerical and experimental investigations into electrokinetic instability (EKI) effects to accomplish mixing of multiple solutions with different electric conductivities in a cross-shaped microchannel. This study considers two multiple-species, namely two aqueous electrolyte solutions and three electrolyte solutions with conductivity ratios ranging between 1 and 10, respectively. A stratified flow condition is formed when the intensity of the applied DC electrical field is below a certain threshold value. However, as the intensity increased, various EKI phenomena are induced, including a series of flow recirculations at the interfaces of neighboring species flows, a string of pearl-like flow structures aligned with the low-conductivity species stream, and a wavy perturbation of the species interfaces. The EKI phenomena are clarified in terms of the respective axial velocities and specie flow pressure gradients. In practice, the nature of the EKI effect depends upon the relative directions of the conductivity gradients within the microchannel. Analyzing the EKI phenomena effects in mixing multiple-species, it is found that the mixing performance obtained when the conductivity gradients are orientated in opposing directions is higher than that achieved when the conductivity gradients are aligned. Furthermore, the optimal mixing index is achieved when the conductivity gradients are directed away from one another (i.e. from the center of the microchannel toward the microchannel walls) rather than toward one another (i.e. from the microchannel walls toward the center of the microchannel).

Keywords

Electrokinetic instability Conductivity Mixing index 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author gratefully acknowledges the financial support provided to this study by the National Science Council of Taiwan under Grant Nos. NSC 96-2622-E-167-006-CC3 and NSC 96-2221-E-269-011-MY2.

References

  1. Ajdari A (1995) Electro-osmosis on inhomogeneously charged surfaces. Phys Rev Lett 75(4):755–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baygents JC, Baldessari F (1998) Electrohydrodynamic instability in a thin fluid layer with an electrical conductivity gradient. Phys Fluids 10:301–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biddiss E, Erickson D, Li D (2004) Heterogeneous surface charge enhanced micromixing for electrokinetic flows. Anal Chem 76(11):3208–3213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Branerbjerg J, Gravesen P, Krog JP, Nielsen CR (1996) Fast mixing by lamination. In: Proceedings of IEEE MEMS, pp 441–446Google Scholar
  5. Chang CC, Yang RJ (2006) A particle tracking method for analyzing chaotic electroosmotic flow mixing in 3-D microchannels with patterned charged surfaces. J Micromech Microeng 16(8):1453–1462CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang CC, Yang RJ (2007) Electrokinetic mixing in microfluidic systems. Microfluidics Nanofluidics 3(5):501–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen CH, Lin H, Lele SK, Santiago JG (2005) Convective and absolute electrokinetic instability with conductivity gradients. J Fluid Mech 524:263–303MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Erickson D, Li D (2002) Influence of surface heterogeneity on electrokinetically driven microfluidic mixing. Langmuir 18(5):1883–1892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoburg JF, Melcher JR (1977) Electrohydrodynamic mixing and instability induced by collinear fields and conductivity gradients. Phys Fluids 20:903–911MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hunter RJ (1981) Zeta potential in colloid science: principles and applications. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Koch M, Chatelain D, Evans AGR, Brunnschweiler A (1998) Two simple micromixers based on silicon. J Micromech Microeng 8(2):123–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee YK, Deval J, Tabeling P and Ho CM (2001) Chaotic mixing in electrokinetically and pressure driven micro flows. In: Proceedings of IEEE MEMS, pp 483–486Google Scholar
  13. Lin CH, Lee GB, Lin YH, Chang GL (2001) A fast prototyping process for fabrication of microfluidic systems on soda-lime glass. J Micromech Microeng 11(6):726–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lin H, Storey BD, Oddy MH, Chen CH, Santiago JG (2004) Instability of electrokinetic microchannel flows with conductivity gradients. Phys Fluids 16:1922–1935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lu LH, Ryu KS, Liu CJ (2002) A magnetic microstirrer and array for microfluidic mixing. J MEMS 11(5):462–469Google Scholar
  16. Luo WJ (2004) Transient elestro-osmotic flow induced by DC or AC electric fields in a curved micro-tube. J Colloid Interface Sci 278(2):497–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luo WJ (2006) Transient electroosmotic flow induced by ac electric field in microchannel with patchwise surface heterogeneities. J Colloid Interface Sci 295:551–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luo WJ, Yarn KF, Hsu SP (2007) Analysis of electrokinetic mixing using AC electric field and patchwise surface heterogeneities. Jpn J Appl Phys 46:1608–1616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luo WJ, Yarn KF, Shih MH, Yu KC (2008) Microfluidic mixing utilizing electrokinetic instability stirred by electrical field intensity perturbations in a glass microchannel. Optoelectron Adv Mater Rapid Commun 2(2):117–125Google Scholar
  20. Mengeaud V, Josserand J, Girault HH (2002) Mixing processes in a zigzag microchannel: finite element simulations and optical study. Anal Chem 74:4279–4286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Melcher JR, Taylor GI (1969) Electrohydrodynamics: a review of the role of interfacial shear stress. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 1:111–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miyake R, Lammerink TSJ, Elwenspoek M, Fluitman JHJ (1993) Micro mixer with fast diffusion. In: Proceedings of IEEE MEMS, pp 248–253Google Scholar
  23. Oddy MH, Santiago JG (2005) Multiple-species model for electrokinetic instability. Phys Fluids 17:064108-1–064108-17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pan YJ, Ren CM, Yang RJ (2007) Electrokinetic flow focusing and valveless switching integrated with electrokinetic instability for mixing enhancement. J Micromech Microeng 17:820–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Qian S, Bau HH (2002) A chaotic electroosmotic stirrer. Anal Chem 74(15):3616–3625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rife JC, Bell MI, Horwitz JS, Kabler MN, Kabler RCY, Auyeung RCY, Kim WJ (2000) Miniature valveless ultrasonic pumps and mixers. Sens Actuators A 86:135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saville DA (1997) Electrohydrodynamics: the Taylor-Melcher leaky dielectric model. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 29:27–64CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. Tai CH, Yang RJ, Fu LM (2006) Micromixer utilizing electrokinetic instability-induced shedding effect. Electrophoresis 27:4982–4990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Voldman J, Gray ML, Schmidt MA (2000) Integrated liquid mixer/valve. J MEMS 9(3):295–302Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Refrigeration, Air Conditioning and Energy EngineeringNational Chin-Yi University of TechnologyTaipingTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations