Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 245–281 | Cite as

Digital microfluidics: is a true lab-on-a-chip possible?

Review

Abstract

The suitability of electrowetting-on-dielectric (EWD) microfluidics for true lab-on-a-chip applications is discussed. The wide diversity in biomedical applications can be parsed into manageable components and assembled into architecture that requires the advantages of being programmable, reconfigurable, and reusable. This capability opens the possibility of handling all of the protocols that a given laboratory application or a class of applications would require. And, it provides a path toward realizing the true lab-on-a-chip. However, this capability can only be realized with a complete set of elemental fluidic components that support all of the required fluidic operations. Architectural choices are described along with the realization of various biomedical fluidic functions implemented in on-chip electrowetting operations. The current status of this EWD toolkit is discussed. However, the question remains: which applications can be performed on a digital microfluidic platform? And, are there other advantages offered by electrowetting technology, such as the programming of different fluidic functions on a common platform (reconfigurability)? To understand the opportunities and limitations of EWD microfluidics, this paper looks at the development of lab-on-chip applications in a hierarchical approach. Diverse applications in biotechnology, for example, will serve as the basis for the requirements for electrowetting devices. These applications drive a set of biomedical fluidic functions required to perform an application, such as cell lysing, molecular separation, or analysis. In turn, each fluidic function encompasses a set of elemental operations, such as transport, mixing, or dispensing. These elemental operations are performed on an elemental set of components, such as electrode arrays, separation columns, or reservoirs. Examples of the incorporation of these principles in complex biomedical applications are described.

Keywords

Lab-on-a-chip Digital microfluidics Biomedical applications Detection Analysis Electrowetting 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges funding from the following sources that has enabled technology development and collaborative efforts across many disciplines: DARPA, NSF, NIH, Lord Foundation, Glaxo Smith Kline, and the Duke University Medical Center. In addition, substantial contributions are acknowledged by current and former students at Duke University whose contributions have helped establish significant progess in the application of EWD towards a useful end.

References

  1. Abdel-Hamid I, Ivnitski D, Atanasov P, Wilkins E (1999) Flow-through immunofiltration assay system for rapid detection of E. coli O157:H7. Biosens Bioelectron 14:309–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aizenberg J, Krupenkin T, Kolodner P (2006) Accelerated chemical reactions for lab-on-a-chip applications using electrowetting-induced droplet self oscillations. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 915:103–111Google Scholar
  3. Anton DA, Valentino JP, Trojan SM, Wagner S (2003) Thermocapillary actuation of droplets on chemically patterned surfaces by programmable microheater arrays. J Microelectromech Syst 12:873–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bains W, Smith GC (1988) A novel method for nucleic acid sequence determination. J Theor Biol 135(3):303–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berge B (1993) Electrocapillarite et mouillage de films isolants par l’eau. C R Acad Sci II 317:157Google Scholar
  6. Berthier J, Clementz Ph, Raccurt O, Jary D, Claustre P, Peponnet C, Fouillet Y (2006) Computer aided design of an EWOD microdevice. Sens Actuators A 127:283–294Google Scholar
  7. Braslavsky I, Hebert B et al (2003) Sequence information can be obtained from single DNA molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(7):3960–3964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brenner S, Williams SR et al (2000) In vitro cloning of complex mixtures of DNA on microbeads: physical separation of differentially expressed cDNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(4):1665–1670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cady NC, Stelick S, Kunnavakkam MV, Liu Y, Batt CA (2004) A microchip-based DNA purification and real-time PCR biosensor for bacterial detection. Proc IEEE Sens 3:1191–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chatterjee D, Boonta H, Wheeler AR, King J, Garrell RL (2006) Droplet-based microfluidics with nonaqueous solvents and solutions. Lab Chip 6:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cho S-K, Kim C-J (2003) Particle separation and concentration control for digital microfluidic systems. Proc IEEE Micro Electro Mech Syst (MEMS) 686–689Google Scholar
  12. Cho S-K, Moon H, Fowler J, Kim C-J (2001) Splitting a liquid droplet for electrowetting-based microfluidics. In: Proceedings of 2001 ASME Inter Mech Eng Congress and Expo, November 11–16, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  13. Cho S-K, Fan S-K, Moon H, Kim C-J (2002) Towards digital microfluidic circuits: creating, transporting, cutting and merging liquid droplets by electrowetting-based actuation. Technical Digest MEMS 2002 IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, vol 11, pp 454–461Google Scholar
  14. Cho S-K, Moon H, Kim C-J (2003) Creating, transporting, cutting, and merging liquid droplets by electrowetting-based actuation for digital microfluidic circuits. J Microelectromech Syst 12(1):70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chou H-P, Unger MA, Quake SR (2001) A microfabricated rotary pump. Biomed Microdevices 3(4):323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooney CG, Chen C-Y, Emerling MR, Nadim A, Sterling JD (2006) Electrowetting droplet microfluidics on a single planar surface. Microfluid Nanofluid 2:435–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deamer DW, Akeson M (2000) Nanopores and nucleic acids: prospects for ultrarapid sequencing. Trends Biotechnol 18:147–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deamer DW, Branton D (2002) Characterization of nucleic acids by nanopore analysis. Acc Chem Res 35:817–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Delamarche E (1997) Patterned delivery of immunoglobulins to surfaces using microfluidic networks. Science 276:779–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Delamarche E (1998) Microfluidic networks for chemical patterning of substrates: design and applications to bioassays. J Am Chem Soc 120:500–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ding J, Chakrabarty K, Fair RB (2001) Scheduling of microfluidic operations for reconfigurable two-dimensional electrowetting arrays. IEEE Trans Computer -Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst 29:1463–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Drmanac S (1998) Accurate sequencing by hybridization for DNA diagnostics and individual genomics. Nature Biotechnol 16:54–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Emrich CA (2002) Microfabricated 384-lane capillary array electrophoresis bioanalyzer for ultrahigh-throughput genetic analysis. Anal Chem 74:5076–5083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fair RB, Pollack MG, Woo R, Pamula VK, Ren H, Zhang T, Venkatraman J (2001) A microwatt metal-insulator-solution-transport (MIST) device for scalable digital bio-microfluidic systems. Technical Digest, International Electron Device Meeting, pp 367–370Google Scholar
  25. Fair RB, Srinivasan V, Paik P, Ren H, Pamula VK, Pollack MG (2003) Electrowetting-based on-chip sample processing for integrated microfluidics. Technical Digest IEEE International Electron Dev Meeting, 2003, pp 779–782Google Scholar
  26. Fair RB, Khlystov A, Srinivasan V, Pamula VK, Weaver KN (2004) Integrated chemical/biochemical sample collection, pre-concentration, and analysis on a digital microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platform. In: Smith LA, Sobek D (eds) Lab-on-a-chip: platforms, devices, and applications., Proceedings. Oof SPIE 5591, pp 113–124Google Scholar
  27. Fair RB (2005) Dynamically reconfigurable surfaces for microfluidic applications. MRS Spring Meeting, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  28. Fair RB, Khlystov A, Tailor T, Ivanov V, Evans RD, Srinivasan V, Pamula V, Pollack MG, Griffin PB, Zhou J (2007) Chemical and biological applications of digital-microfluidic devices. IEEE Des Test (in press)Google Scholar
  29. Fan S-K, Hashi C, Kim C-J (2003) Manipulation of multiple droplets on nxm grid by cross-reference EWOD driving scheme and pressure-contact packaging. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 16thSixteenth annual interernational conference on micro electro mechanical sSystems, pp 694–697Google Scholar
  30. Fang Q (2004) Sample introduction for microfluidic systems. Anal Bioanal Chem 378:49–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Figeys D, Gygi SP, McKinnon G, Aebersold R (1998) An integrated microfluidics-tandem mass spectrometry system for automated protein analysis. Anal Chem 70:3728–3734Google Scholar
  32. Fitzpatrick A (2006) Creating a rapid handheld malaria detection device for developing countries. Research project Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  33. Fodor SPA, Read JL et al (1995) Light-directed, spatially addressable parallel chemical synthesis. Science 251(4995):767–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fowler J, Moon H, Kim C-J (2002) Enhancement of mixing by droplet-based microfluidics. Proc IEEE MEMS 97–100Google Scholar
  35. Gascoyne PRC, Vykoukal JV (2004) Dielectrophoresis-based sample handling in general-purpose programmable diagnostic instruments. Proc IEEE 92:22–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gong M, Kim CJ (2005) Two-dimensional digital microfluidic system by multilayer printed circuit board. In: 18th IEEE international conference on micro electro mechanical systems, pp 726–729Google Scholar
  37. Griffith EJ, Srinivas A, Goldberg MK (2006) Performance characterization of a reconfigurable planar-array digital microfluidic system. IEEE Trans Comput Aided Des Integr Circuits and Syst 25:345–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harrison DJ, Fluri K, Chiem N, Tang T, Fan Z (1996) Micromachining chemical and biochemical analysis and reaction systems on glass substrates. Sens Actuators B Chem B33:105–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. He B, Burke BJ, Zhang X, Zhang R, Regnier FE (2001) A picoliter-volume mixer for microfluidic analytical systems. Anal Chem 73:1942–1947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Heim S, Schnieder I, Binz D, Vogel A, Bilitewski U (1999) Development of an automated microbial sensor system. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 14:187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hessel V, Lowe H, Schoenfeld F (2005) Micromixers-a review on passive and active mixing principles. Chem Engrg Sci 60:2479–2501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hinsmann P, Haberkorn M (2001) Time resolved FTIR spectroscopy of chemical reactions in solution in fast diffusion-based mixing in a micromachined flow cell. Appl Spectrosc 55:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hosokawa K, Fujii T, Endo I (1999a) Handling of picoliter liquid samples in a poly(dimethylsiloxane)-based microfluidic device. Anal Chem 71:4781–4785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hosokawa K, Fujii T, Endo I (1999b) Droplet-based nano/picoliter mixer using hydrophobic microcapillary vent. Micro Electro Mech Syst 1999:388Google Scholar
  45. Jacobson SC, McKnight TE, Ramsey JM (1999) Microfluidic devices for electrokinetically driven parallel and serial mixing. Anal Chem 71:4455–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jary D, Chollat-Namy A, Fouillet Y, Boutet J, Chabrol C, Castellan G, Gasparutto D, Pepponet C (2006) DNA repair enzyme analysis on EWOD fluidic microprocessor. NSTI Nanotech 2006 Technical Proceedings, vol 2, pp :554–557Google Scholar
  47. Jones TB, Fowler JD, Chang YS, Kim C-J (2003) Frequency-based relationship of electrowetting and dielectrophoretic liquid microactuation. Langmuir 19:7646–7651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jopling J (2001) Microfluidic architecture and biomedical applications simulation. MS Thesis, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  49. Jurinke C, van den Boom D (2002) The use of MassARRAY technology for high throughput genotyping. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 77:57–74Google Scholar
  50. Kartalov EP, Quake SR (2004) Microfluidic device reads up to four consecutive base pairs in DNA sequencing-by-synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res 32:2873–2879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Koch M, Chatelain D (1998) Two simple micromixers based on silicon. J Micromech Microeng 8:123–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Koutny L et al (2000) Eight hundred-base sequencing in a microfabricated electrophoretic device. Anal Chem 72:2288–3391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lagally ET, Simpson PC, Mathies RA (2000) Monolithic integrated microfluidic DNA amplification and capillary electrophoresis analysis system. Sens Actuators B 63:138–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lee J, Moon H, Fowler J, Kim C-J, Schoellhammer T (2001) Addressable micro liquid handling by electric control of surface tension. In: Proceedings. of the 2001 IEEE 14th international conference on MEMS, Interlaken, Switzerland, pp 499–502Google Scholar
  55. Li J, Gershow M (2003) DNA molecules and configurations in a solid-state nanopore microscope. Nat Mater 2:611–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lienemann J, Greiner A, Korvink JG (2006) Modeling, simulation, and optimization of electrowetting. IEEE Trans Comput Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst 25:234–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ligler FS, Anderson GP, Davidson PT, Foch RJ, Ives JT, King KD, Page G, Stenger DA, Whelen JP (1998) Remote sensing using an airborne biosensor. Environmental Sci Tech 32:2461–2466 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Liu RH, Stremler MA, Sharp KV, Olsen MG, Santiago JG, Adrian RJ, Aref H, Beebe DJ (2000) Passive mixing in a three-dimensional serpentine microchannel. IEEE J Microelectromech Syst 9:190–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Liu RH, Yang JN, Lenigk R, Bonanno J, Grodzinski P (2004) Self-contained, fully integrated biochip for sample preparation, polymerase chain reaction amplification, and DNA microarray detection. Anal Chem 76(7):1824–1831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Madou MJ, Cubicciotti R (2003) Scaling issues in chemical and biological sensors. Proc IEEE 91:830–838Google Scholar
  61. Manz A, Graber N, Widmer HM (1990) Miniaturized total chemical analysis systems: a novel concept for chemical sensing. Sens Actuators B1:244–248Google Scholar
  62. Margulies M, Egolm M et al. (2005) Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437(7057):376–380Google Scholar
  63. Metzker ML, Raghavachari R et al (1994) Termination of DNA synthesis by novel 3′-modified-deoxyribonucleoside 5′-triphosphates. Nucleic Acids Res 22(20):4259–4267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mitra RD, Butty VL et al (2003) Digital genotyping and haplotyping with polymerase colonies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(10):5926–5931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Moon H, Cho SK, Garrell RL, Kim CJ (2002) Low voltage electrowetting-on-dielectric. J Appl Phys 92:4080–4087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Moon H, Wheeler AR, Garrell RL, Loo JA, Kim C-J (2006) An integrated digital microfluidic chip for multiplexed proteomic sample preparation and analysis by MADDA-MS. Lab Chip 6:1213–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mudsen BC, Murphy RJ (1981) Flow-injection and photometric-determination of sulfate in rainwater with methylthymol blue. Anal Chem 53:1924–1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mugele F, Baret JC (2005) Electrowetting: from basics to applications. J Phys Condens Matter 17:R705–R774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mugele F, Baret J-C, Steinhauser D (2006) Microfluidic mixing through electrowetting-induced droplet oscillations. Appl Phys Lett 88:204106-1–3Google Scholar
  70. Musyanovych A, Mailander V, Landfester K (2005) Miniemulsion droplets as single molecule nanoreactors for polymerase chain reaction. Biomacromolecules 6:1824–1828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nagiel I (2006) Capacttive hysteresis curves in a microfluidic environment. ECE198 project Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  72. Nakane J, Broemeling D, Donaldson R, Marziali A, Willis TD, O’Keefe M, Davis RW (2001) A method for parallel, automayed, thermal cycling of submicroliter samples. Genome Res 11:441–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ottesen EA, Hong JW, Quake SR, Leadbetter JR (2006) Microfluidic digital PCR enables multigene analysis of individual environmental bacteria. Science 314(5804):1464–1467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Paegel BM, Blazej RG et al (2003) Microfluidic devices for DNA sequencing: sample preparation and electrophoretic analysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol 14:42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Paik PY (2006) Adaptive hot-spot cooling of integrated circuits using digital microfluidics. Ph.D. thesis, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  76. Paik P, Pamula VK, Pollack MG, Fair RB (2003a) Electrowetting-based droplet mixers for microfluidic systems. Lab Chip 3:28–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Paik P, Pamula VK, Fair RB (2003b) Rapid droplet mixers for digital microfluidic systems. Lab Chip 3:253–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Paik PY, Pamula VK, Chakrabarty K (2004) Thermal effects on droplet transport in digitial microfluidics with applications to chip cooling. In: Thermomechanical phenomena in electronic systems—proceedings of the intersociety conference, v 1, ITherm 2004—9th intersociety conference on thermal and thermomechanical phenomena in electronic systems, pp 649–654Google Scholar
  79. Pamula VK, Paik P, Venkatraman J, Pollack MG, Fair RB (2002) Microfluidic electrowetting-based droplet mixing. 2001 Microelectromech Syst Conf 8–10Google Scholar
  80. Pamula VK, Pollack MG, Paik PY, Ren H, Fair RB (2005a) Apparatus for manipulating droplets by electrowetting-based techniques. US Patent 6,911,132, June 28, 2005Google Scholar
  81. Pamula VK, Srinivasan V, Chakrapani H, Fair RB, Toon E (2005b) A droplet-based lab-on-a-chip for colorimetric detection of nitroaromatic explosives. In: 18th IEEE international conference on micro electro mechanical systems, pp 722–725Google Scholar
  82. Pan G, Garcia A, Zhang J (2006) Analog/digital hybrid microfluidic chip for DNA & RNA Analysisanalysis. ECE299.01 class project, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  83. Petersen KE, McMillan WA, Kovacs GTA, Northrup MA, Christel LA, Pourahmadi F (1998) Toward next generation clinical diagnostic instruments: scaling and new processing paradigms. Clinical Diag Inst 71–79Google Scholar
  84. Pollack MG (2001) Electrowetting-based microactuation of droplets for digital microfluidics. Ph.D. thesis, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  85. Pollack MG, Fair RB, Shenderov AD (2000) Electrowetting-based actuation of liquid droplets for microfluidic applications. Appl Phys Lett 77:1725–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Pollack MG, Shendorov A, Fair RB (2002) Electrowetting–-based actuation of droplets for integrated microfluidics. Lab Chip 2:96–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Pollack MG, Paik PY, Shenderov AD, Pamula VK, Dietrich FS, Fair RB (2003) Investigation of electrowetting-based microfluidics for real-time PCR applications. In: 7thSeventh International conference on miniaturized chemical and biochemical analysis systems ( μTAS 2003), Lake TahaoGoogle Scholar
  88. Quilliet C, Berge B (2002) Investigation of effective interface potentials by electrowetting. Europhys Lett 60:99–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Ramsey JM, van Den Berg A (eds). (2001) Micro total analysis systems. Kluwer, MontereyGoogle Scholar
  90. Ren H (2004) Electrowetting-based sample preparation: an initial study for droplet transportation, creation and on-chip digital dilution. Ph.D. Tthesis, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  91. Ren H, Srinivasan V, Fair RB (2003a) Design and testing of an interpolating mixing architecture for electrowetting-based droplet on-chip chemical dilution. In: 12th International conferenceInter Conf on solid-state sensors, actuators and microsystems. Digest of Technical Papers, pp 619–622Google Scholar
  92. Ren H, Srinivasan V, Fair RB (2003b) Automated electrowetting-based droplet dispensing with good reproducibility. Proceedings of MicroTAS 2003:993–996Google Scholar
  93. Renaudin A, Tabourier P, Zhang V, Druhon C, Camart JC (2004) “Plateforme SAW dédiée à la microfluidique discrète pour applications biologiques”., In: 2ème Congrès Français de Microfluidique, Société Hydrotechnique de France, Toulouse, France, pp 14–16Google Scholar
  94. Rohr T, Yu C, Davey M, Svec F, Frechet J (2001) Porous polymer monoliths: simple and efficient mixers prepared by direct polymerization in the channels of microfluidic chips. Electrophoresis 22:3959–3967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ronaghi M (2001) Pyrosequencing sheds light on DNA Sequencing. Genome Res 11:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Ruzicka J (1998) Bioligand interaction assay by flow injection absorptiometry using a nenewable biosensor system enhanced by spectral resolution. The Analyst 123:1617–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Schmalzing D (1997) DNA typing in thirty seconds with a microfabricated device. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 94:10273–10278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Schneegass I, Brautigam R, Kohler JM (2001) Miniaturized flow-through PCR with different template types in a silicon chip thermocycler. Lab Chip 1:42–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Schwartz LW, Roy RV, Eley RR, Princen HM (2004) Surfactant-driven motion and splitting of droplets on a substrate. J Eng Math 50:157–175MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  100. Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN (1998) Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  101. Seyrat E, Hayes RA (2001) Amorphous fluoropolymers as insulators for reversible low-voltage electrowetting. J Appl Phys 90:1383–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Shoffner MA, Cheng J, Hvichia G, Kricka L, Wilding P (1996) Chip PCR. I. Surface passivation of microfabricated silicon-glass chips for PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 24:375–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Squires TM, Quake SR (2005) Microfluidics: fluid physics at the nanoliter scale. Rev Mod Phys 77:977–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Srinivasan V (2005) A digital microfluidic lab-on-a-chip for clinical applications. Ph.D. thesis, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  105. Srinivasan V, Pamula VK, Pollack MG, Fair RB (2003a) Clinical diagnostics on human whole blood, plasma, serum, urine, saliva, sweat, and tears on a digital microfluidic platform. Proc MicroTAS 2003:1287–1290Google Scholar
  106. Srinivasan V, Pamula VK, Rao KD, Pollack MG, Izatt JA, Fair RB (2003b) 3-D Imaging of moving droplets for microfluidics using optical coherence tomography. In: 7thSeventh International conference on miniaturized chem and biochem anal systems (μTAS 2003), Lake TahaoGoogle Scholar
  107. Srinivasan V, Pamula VK, Paik PY, Fair RB (2004a) Protein stamping for MALDI mass spectrometry using an electrowetting-based microfluidic platform, In: Smith LA, Sobek D (eds) in lLab-on-a-chip: platforms, devices, and applications. Proc. of SPIE 5591, pp 26–34Google Scholar
  108. Srinivasan V, Pamula VK, Fair RB (2004b) A droplet-based microfluidic lab-on-a-chip for glucose detection. Anal Chim Acta 507:145–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Staicu A, Mugele F (2006) Electrowetting-induced oil film entrapment and instability. Phys Rev Lett 97:16780–16784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Stryer L (1995) Biochemistry, 4th edn. W.H. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  111. Su F, Chakrabarty K, Fair RB (2006) Microfluidics-based biochips: technology issues, implementation platforms, and design automation challenges. IEEE Trans Computer- Aided Des Of Integr Circuits. And Syst 25:211–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Terrier F (1982) Rate and equilibrium studies in Jackson–Meisenheimer complexes. Chem Rev 82:77–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Tian H, Huhmer AFR, Landers JP (2000) Evaluation of silica resins for direct and efficient extraction of DNA from complex biological matrices in a miniaturized format. Anal Biochem 283:175–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Tokoro M, Katayama T, Taniguchi T, Torii T, Higuchi T (2002) PCR using electrostatic micromanipulation. In: Proceedings of the 41st SICE annual conference, vol 2, pp :954–956Google Scholar
  115. Trinder P (1969) Determination of blood glucose using 4- amino phenazon as oxygen acceptor. J Clinical Pathology 22:246Google Scholar
  116. Tulock JJ, Shannon MA, Bohn PW, Sweedler JV (2004) Microfluidic separation and gateable fraction collection for mass-limited samples. Anal Chem 76:6419–6425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. V-Dinh T (1998) Development of a DNA biochip: principle and application. Sens Actuators B 51:52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Verheijen HJJ, Prins MWJ (1999) Reversible electrowetting and trapping of charge: model and experiments. Langmuir 15:6616–6620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Vijay A, Mathew N, Erb R (2006) Detection of the presence of a specific DNA strand using fiber optic spectroscopy. ECE299.01 class project, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  120. Wainright A, Nguyen UT, Bjornson T, Boone TD (2003) Preconcentration and separation of double stranded DNA fragments by electrophoresis in plastic microfluidic devices. Electrophoresis 24:3784–3792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Walker SW, Shapiro B (2006) Modeling the fluid dynamics of electrowetting on dielectric (EWOD). J Microelectromechanical Syst 15:986–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Walker PA, Morris MD, Burns MA, Johnson BN (1998) Isotachophoretic separations on a microchip: normal Raman spectroscopy detection. Anal Chem 70(18):3766–3769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Wang W, Li Z-X, Luo R, Lu S-H, Xu A-D, Yang Y-J (2005) Droplet-based micro oscillating-flow PCR chip. J Micromech Microeng 15:1369–1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Wheeler AR, Moon H, Kim C-J, Loo JA, Garrell RL (2004) Electrowetting-based microfluidics for analysis of peptides and proteins by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 76:4833–4838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Wheeler AR, Moon H, Bird CA, Orgazalek Loo RR, Kim C-J, Loo JA, Garrell RL (2005) Digital microfluidics with in-line sample purification for proteomics analyses with MALDI-MS. Anal Chem 77:534–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Wolfe KA, Breadmore MC, Ferrance JP, Power ME, Conroy JF, Norris PM, Landers JP (2002) Toward a microchip-based solid-phase extraction method for isolation of nucleic acids. Electrophoresis 23:727–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Yi U-C, Kim C-J (2003) Soft printing of droplets digitized by electrowetting. Transducers 2003:1804–1808Google Scholar
  128. Yi U-C, Kim C-J (2006) Characterization of electrowetting actuation on addressable single-side coplanar electrodes. J Micromech Microeng 16:2053–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Yoon J-Y, Garrell RL (2003) Preventing biomolecular adsorption in electrowetting-based biofluidic chips. Anal Chem 75:5097–5102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Zeng J (2006) Modeling and simulation of electrified droplets and its application to computer-aided design of digital microfluidics. IEEE Trans Comput Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst 25:224–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Zeng J, Korsmeyer F (2004) Princilpes of droplet electrohydrodynamics for lab-on-a-chip. Lab Chip 4:265–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Zhang T, Chakrabarty K, Fair RB (2002) Microfluidic systems modeling and simulation. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  133. Zhang T, Chakrabarty K, Fair RB (2004) Behavioral modeling and performance evaluation of microelectrofluidics-based PCR systems using System C. IEEE Trans Comput -Aided Des Integr Circuits and Syst 23:843–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Zhao Y, Cho SK (2006) Microparticle sampling by electrowetting-actuated droplet sweeping. Lab Chip 6(1):137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations