Combining fluidic reservoirs and optical tweezers to control beads/living cells contacts
- 133 Downloads
We have developed a complete system based on holographic optical tweezers to realize multiple-point interactions between beads and cells with control of the stimulation places, timing and durations. We introduce microstereolithography as a 3D micromanufacturing approach to the rapid prototyping of three-dimensional fluidic microchambers of complex shapes, comprising wells, channels and walls, that are afterwards placed inside the sample and used to inject beads locally and keep them separated from cells in our assays. A custom reservoir designed to keep beads and cells separated in liquid samples has been realized and successfully tested. This allows us to deposit beads locally on the microscope cover glass placed under the reservoir outlet. Limited dispersion of beads under the outlet has been confirmed, and the ability of the polymeric structures to confine beads in a restricted area has been demonstrated. Examples of manipulations consisting at first in extracting several beads from the reservoir, making them travel to the target cell, and finally depositing on its outer membrane with respect to the shape of the target cell, are finally given.
KeywordsOptical tweezers Microstereolithography Microfluidics Cell activation
This work has been supported in part by CARL ZEISS S.A. and the “Conseil Régional de la Région Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur”. HOT setup has been supported by the CEE. Microstereolithography has been supported by the CNRS-MRCT.
- Ashkin A, Dziedzic J, Bjorkholm J, Chu S (1986) Observations of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles. Opt Lett 11:288–290Google Scholar
- Belloni F, Monneret S, Marguet D (2006) Interactive space-time controlled application of different stimuli for cells dynamics study. Proc SPIE 6326:OR-1–OR-10Google Scholar
- Bertsch A, Jiguet S, Bernhard P, Renaud P (2003) Microstereolithography: a review. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 758:LL1–LL12Google Scholar
- Gerchberg R, Saxton W (1972) A practical algorithm for the determination of the phase from image and diffraction plane pictures. Optik 35:237–246Google Scholar
- Ikuta K, Hirowatari K (1993) Real three-dimensional microfabrication using stereolithography and metal molding. Proc IEEE Micro Electro Mech Syst 42–47Google Scholar
- Jacobs PF (1992) Rapid prototyping and manufacturing: fondamentals of stereolithography. The Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MIGoogle Scholar
- Monneret S, Loubère V, Corbel S (1999) Microstereolitho-graphy using a dynamic mask generator and a non coherent visible light source. Symposium on Design, Test and Microfabrication of MEMS/MOEMS. Proc SPIE 3680:553–561Google Scholar
- Monneret S, Provin C, Le Gall H (2001) Microscale rapid prototyping by stereolithography. In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International conference on emerging technologies and factory automation, Proceedings IEEE Piscataway, vol 2. NJ, USA, pp 299–304Google Scholar
- Monneret S, Belloni F, Marguet D (2006) Practical lab tool for living cells based on microstereolithography and multiple dynamic holographic optical tweezers. Proc SPIE 6088:273–285Google Scholar
- Provin C, Monneret S, Le Gall H, Rigneault H, Lenne P-F, Giovannini H (2001) New process for manufacturing ceramic microfluidic devices for microreactor and bioanalytical applications. In: Microreaction Technology: Proceedings of the 5th International conference on microreaction technology, Springer, Berlin, pp 103–112Google Scholar
- Reicherter M, Haist T, Wagemann E, Tiziani H (1999) Optical particle trapping with computer-generated holograms written on a liquid-crystal dysplay. Opt Lett 24:608–610Google Scholar