Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 495–499 | Cite as

Droplet coalescence by geometrically mediated flow in microfluidic channels

Short Communication

Abstract

Microfluidic flow is geometrically mediated at a trifurcating junction allowing periodically formed, equally spaced out emulsion droplets to redistribute and fuse consistently. This is achieved by controlling the ratio between the droplet transport time across the trifurcating junction and the drainage time of the fluid volume separating the droplets tr/td. Three different microfluidic trifurcation geometries have been designed and compared for their droplet fusion efficiencies. Fusion of up to six droplets has been observed in these devices. The fusion of two droplets occurs when tr/td is equal to 1.25 and the number of fused droplets increases with tr/td. When the junction length (d) is 216 μm fusion of 2–6 six droplets are possible however when the junction length is increased to 360 μm fusion of only two droplets is observed.

Keywords

Droplets Coalescence Fusion Mixing Microfluidics 

References

  1. Anna SL, Bontoux N, Stone HA (2003) Formation of dispersions using ‘flow-focusing’ in microchannels. Appl Phys Lett 82:364–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chabert M, Dorfman KD, Viovy JL (2005) Droplet fusion by alternating current (AC) field electrocoalescence in microchannels. Electrophoresis 26:3706–3715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Guttenberg Z, Müller H, Habermüller H, Geisbauer A, Pipper J, Felbel J, Kielpinski M, Scriba J, Wixforth A (2004) Planar chip device for PCR and hybridization with surface acoustic wave pump. Lab Chip 5:308–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ho BP, Leal LG (1975) The creeping motion of liquid drops through a circular tube of comparable diameter. J Fluid Mech 71:361–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hung LH, Choi KM, Tseng WY, Tan YC, Shea KJ, Lee AP (2006) Alternating droplet generation and controlled dynamic droplet fusion in microfluidic device for CdS nanoparticles synthesis. Lab Chip 6:174–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Klaseboer E, Chevaillier JP, Gourdon C, Masbernat O (2000) Film drainage between colliding drops at constant approach velocity experiments and modeling. J Colloid Interface Sci 229:274–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kohler JM, Henkel T, Grodrian A, Kirner T, Roth M, Martin K, Metze J (2004) Digital reaction technology by micro segmented flow—components, concepts and applications. Chem Eng J 101:201–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Link DR, Anna SL, Weitz DA, Stone HA (2004) Geometrically mediated breakup of drops in microfluidic devices. Phys Rev Lett 92:05403–05404Google Scholar
  9. Olbricht WL, Kung DM (1987) The interaction and coalescence of liquid drops in flow through a capillary tube. J Colloid Interface Sci 120:229–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Srinivasan V, Pamula VK, Fair RB (2004) An integrated digital microfluidic lab-on-a-chip for clinical diagnostics on human physiological fluids. Lab Chip 4:310–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tan YC, Fisher JS, Lee AI, Cristini V, Lee AP (2004) Design of microfluidic channel geometries for the control of droplet volume, chemical concentration, and sorting. Lab Chip 4:292–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tan YC, Lee AP (2005) Microfluidic separation of satellite droplets as the basis of a monodispersed micron and submicron emulsification system. Lab Chip 5:1178–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tan YC, Cristini V, Lee AP (2006a) Monodispersed microfluidic droplet generation by shear focusing microfluidic device. Sens Actuators B 114:350–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tan YC, Hettiarachchi K, Siu M, Pan YR, Lee AP (2006b) Controlled microfluidic encapsulation of cells, proteins and microbeads in lipid vesicles. JACS 128:5656–5658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Thorsen T, Roberts RW, Arnold FH, Quake SR (2001) Dynamic pattern formation in a vesicle-generating microfluidic device. Phys Rev Lett 86:4163–4166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Utada AS, Lorenceau E, Link DR, Kaplan PD, Stone HA, Weitz DA (2005) Monodisperse double emulsions generated from a microcapillary device. Science 308:537–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zheng B, Roach LS, Ismagilov (2003) RF, screening of protein crystallization conditions on a microfluidic chip using nanoliter-size droplets. J Am Chem Soc 125:11170–11171CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yung-Chieh Tan
    • 1
  • Yao Li Ho
    • 1
  • Abraham Phillip Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations