Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 2, Issue 5, pp 435–446 | Cite as

Electrowetting droplet microfluidics on a single planar surface

Research Paper

Abstract

Electrowetting refers to an electrostatically induced reduction in the contact angle of an electrically conductive liquid droplet on a surface. Most designs ground the droplet by either sandwiching the droplet with a grounding plate on top or by inserting a wire into the droplet. Washizu and others have developed systems capable of generating droplet motion without a top plate while allowing the droplet potential to float. In contrast to these designs, we demonstrate an electrowetting system in which the droplet can be electrically grounded from below using thin conductive lines on top of the dielectric layer. This alternative method of electrically grounding the droplet, which we refer to as grounding-from-below, enables more robust droplet translation without requiring a top plate or wire. We present a concise electrical-energy analysis that accurately describes the distinction between grounded and non-grounded designs, the improvements in droplet motion, and the simplified control strategy associated with grounding-from-below designs. Electrowetting on a single planar surface offers flexibility for interfacing to liquid-handling instruments, utilizing droplet inertial dynamics to achieve enhanced mixing of two droplets upon coalescence, and increasing droplet translation speeds. In this paper, we present experimental results and a number of design issues associated with the grounding-from-below approach.

Keywords

Electrowetting Droplet microfluidics Laboratory automation μTAS Dielectrophoresis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge Robert Melendes and Ming Lu for their assistance and microfabrication expertise, and Dr. Reza Miraghaie for the high-speed image of electrowetting droplet shape oscillations. We also acknowledge NIH/GMS for a mentored quantitative research career development award to James D. Sterling (Grant No. 5K25GM063837), and NIH for the Small Business Innovation Research Awards (Grant No. 2R44GM067469-02).

References

  1. Chen C, Fabrizio EF, Nadim A, Sterling JD (2003) Electrowetting based microfluidic devices: design issues. ASME Summer Bioengineering ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  2. Cho SK, Moon HJ, Kim CJ (2003) Creating, transporting, cutting, and merging liquid droplets by electrowetting-based actuation for digital microfluidic circuits. J Microelectromech Syst 12:70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gascoyne PRC, Vykoukal JV,. Schwartz JA, Anderson TJ, Vykoukal DM,. Current KW, McConaghy C, Becker FF, Andrews C (2004) Dielectrophoresis-based programmable fluidic processors. Lab on a Chip 4:299–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hu H, Larson RG (2002) Evaporation of a sessile droplet on a substrate. J Phys Chemy B 106:1334–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jones TB (2002) On the relationship of dielectrophoresis and electrowetting. Langmuir 18:4437–4443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jones TB, Gunji M, Washizu M, Feldman MJ (2001) Dielectrophoretic liquid actuation and nanodroplet formation. J Appl Phys 89:1441–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kang KH (2002) How electrostatic fields change contact angle in electrowetting. Langmuir 18:10318–10322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee J, Moon H, Fowler J, Schoellhammer T, Kim CJ (2002) Electrowetting and electrowetting-on-dielectric for microscale liquid handling. Sensors Actuators a – Physical 95:259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mugele F, Baret JC (2005) Electrowetting: from basics to applications. J Phys-Condensed Matter 17:R705–R774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pamula V, Pollack MG, Paik P, Ren H, Fair RB (2005) US Patent 6,911,132Google Scholar
  11. Pollack MG, Fair RB, Shenderov AD (2000) Electrowetting-based actuation of liquid droplets for microfluidic applications. Appl Phys Lett 77:1725–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pollack MG, Shenderov AD, Fair RB (2002) Electrowetting-based actuation of droplets for integrated microfluidics. Lab on a Chip 2:96–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pollack MG, Paik PY, Shenderov AD, Pamula VK, Dietrich FS, Fair RB (2003) Investigation of electrowetting-based microfluidics for real-time PCR applications. μTASGoogle Scholar
  14. Seyrat E, Hayes RA (2001) Amorphous fluoropolymers as insulators for reversible low-voltage electrowetting. J Appl Phys 90:1383–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shapiro B, Moon H, Garrell RL, Kim CJ (2003) Equilibrium behavior of sessile drops under surface tension, applied external fields, and material variations. J Appl Phys 93:5794–5811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Srinivasan V, Pamula VK, Pollack MG, Fair RB (2003) Clinical diagnostics on human whole blood, plasma, serum, urine, saliva, sweat, and tears on a digital microfluidic platform. μTASGoogle Scholar
  17. Sterling JD (2003) US Patent Application 20030164295Google Scholar
  18. Torkkeli A, Haara A, Saarilahti J, Harma H, Soukka T, Tolonen P (2001) Electrostatic transportation of water droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces. Proc 14th IEEE Int Conf MEMS 475–478Google Scholar
  19. Torres FE, Kuhnt P, De Bruyker D, Bell AG, Wolkin MV, Peeters E, Williamson JR, Anderson GB, Schmitz GP, Recht MI, Schweizer S, Scott LG, Ho JH, Elrod SA, Schultz PG, Lerner RA, Bruce RH (2004) Enthalpy arrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9517–9522CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Vallet M, Vallade, Berge B (1999) Limiting phenomena for the spreading of water on polymer films by electrowetting. Eur Phys J B 11:583–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Washizu M (1998) Electrostatic actuation of liquid droplets for microreactor applications. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 34:732–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yi UC, Kim CJ (2005) EWOD actuation with electrode-free cover plate. transducers ‘05: The 13th international conference on solid-state sensors, actuators and microsystems, Seoul, KoreaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Keck Graduate InstituteClaremontUSA
  2. 2.Tanner Research, Inc.MonroviaUSA

Personalised recommendations