Advertisement

Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 108–118 | Cite as

Passive micromixers for applications in the microreactor and μTAS fields

  • S. HardtEmail author
  • K. S. Drese
  • V. Hessel
  • F. Schönfeld
Review

Abstract

An overview is given of current developments in micromixing technology, where the emphasis is on liquid mixing in passive micromixers. The mixers presented are differentiated by the hydrodynamic principle employed, and four important principles are discussed in some detail: hydrodynamic focusing, flow separation, chaotic advection, and split-and-recombine flows. It is shown that these principles offer excellent mixing performance in various dynamical regimes. Hydrodynamic focusing is a concept working very much independently of the Reynolds number of the flow. Flow separation offers rich dynamical behavior over a Reynolds number scale of several hundred, with superior performance compared to purely diffusive mixing already found at low Reynolds numbers. For chaotic advection, different implementations tailor-made for low and comparatively high Reynolds numbers exist, both leading to an exponential increase of the interface between two fluids. Split-and-recombine flows can only be realized in a close-to-ideal form in the low Reynolds number regime. Corresponding mixers can be equipped with comparatively wide channels, enabling a favorable ratio of throughput to pressure drop. The overview given in this article should enable a potential user of micromixing technology to select the most favorable concept for the application envisaged, especially in the field of chemical process technology

Keywords

Micromixers Microfluidics 

References

  1. Aref H (1984) Stirring by chaotic advection. J Fluid Mech 143:1–21Google Scholar
  2. Aubin J, Fletcher DF, Bertrand J, Xuereb C (2003) Characterization of the mixing quality in micromixers. Chem Eng Technol 26:1262–1270Google Scholar
  3. Branebjerg JP, Gravesen J, Krog JP, Nielsen CR (1996) Fast mixing by lamination. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE international workshop on micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS‘96), San Diego, California, February 1996, pp 441–446Google Scholar
  4. Cheng KC, Lin RC, Ou JW (1976) Fully developed laminar flow in curved ducts of rectangular channels. Trans ASME J Fluids Eng 141:41–48Google Scholar
  5. Drese KS (2004) Optimization of interdigital micromixers via analytical modeling—exemplified with the SuperFocus mixer. Chem Eng J 101:403–408Google Scholar
  6. Ducrée J, Brenner T, Glatzel T, Zengerle R (2003) A Coriolis-based split-and-recombine laminator for ultrafast mixing on rotating disks. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on micro total analysis systems (μTAS 2003), Lake Tahoe, California, October 2003, pp 603–606Google Scholar
  7. Fletcher CA (1991) Computational techniques for fluid dynamics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Floyd TM, Losey MW, Firebaugh SL, Jensen KF, Schmidt MA (2000) Novel liquid phase microreactors for safe production of hazardous specialty chemicals. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on microreaction technology (IMRET3), Frankfurt, Germany, April 1999, pp 171–180Google Scholar
  9. Guzman AM, Amon CH (1996) Dynamical flow characterization of transitional and chaotic regimes in converging–diverging channels. J Fluid Mech 321:25–57Google Scholar
  10. Hardt S, Schönfeld F (2003) Laminar mixing in different interdigital micromixers: II. Numerical simulations. AIChE J 49:578–584Google Scholar
  11. Herweck T, Hardt S, Hessel V, Löwe H, Hofmann C, Weise F, Dietrich T, Freitag A (2001) Visualization of flow patterns and chemical synthesis in transparent micromixers. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on microreaction technology (IMRET5), Strasbourg, France, May 2001, pp 215–229Google Scholar
  12. Hessel V, Hardt S, Löwe H, Schönfeld F (2003) Laminar mixing in different interdigital micromixers: I. Experimental characterization. AIChE J 49:566–577Google Scholar
  13. Hong CC, Choi JW Ahn CH (2001) A novel in-plane passive micromixer using coanda effect. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on micro total analysis systems (μTAS 2001), Monterey, California, October 2001, pp 31–33Google Scholar
  14. Jiang F, Drese KS, Hardt S, Küpper M, Schönfeld F (2004) Helical flows and chaotic mixing in curved micro channels. AIChE J 50:2297–2305Google Scholar
  15. Jones SW, Thomas OM, Aref H (1989) Chaotic advection by laminar flow in a twisted pipe. J Fluid Mech 209:335–357.Google Scholar
  16. Knight JB, Vishwanath A, Brody JP, Austin RH (1998) Hydrodynamic focusing on a silicon chip: mixing nanoliters in microseconds. Phys Rev Lett 80:3863–3866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lauga E, Stroock AD, Stone HA (2003) Three-dimensional flows in slowly-varying planar geometries. Phys Fluids 16(8):3051–3062Google Scholar
  18. Löb P, Drese KS, Hessel V, Hardt S, Hofmann C, Löwe H, Schenk R, Schönfeld F, Werner B (2004) Steering of liquid mixing speed in interdigital micromixers—from very fast to deliberately slow mixing. Chem Eng Technol (in press)Google Scholar
  19. Löwe H, Ehrfeld W, Hessel V, Richter T, Schiewe J (2000) Micromixing technology. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on microreaction technology (IMRET4), Atlanta, Georgia, March 2000, pp 31–47Google Scholar
  20. Melin J, Gimenez G, Roxhed N, van der Wijngaart W, Stemme G (2003) A passive 2-dimensional liquid sample micromixer. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on micro total analysis systems (μTAS 2003), Lake Tahoe, California, October 2003, pp 167–170Google Scholar
  21. Mengeaud V, Josserand J, Girault HH (2002) Mixing processes in a zigzag microchannel: finite element simulations and optical study. Anal Chem 74:4279–4286Google Scholar
  22. Mensinger H, Richter T, Hessel V, Döpper J, Ehrfeld W (1995) Microreactor with integrated static mixer and analysis system. In: Proceedings of the international conference on micro total analysis systems (μTAS’94), Twente, The Netherlands, November 1994, pp 237–243Google Scholar
  23. Nishimura T, Kojima N (1995) Mass transfer enhancement in a symmetric sinusoidal wavy-walled channel for pulsatile flow. Int J Heat Mass Transf 38:1719–1731Google Scholar
  24. Ottino JM (1989) The kinematics of mixing: stretching, chaos and transport. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. Park SJ, Kim JK, Park J, Chung S, Chung C, Chang JK (2004) Rapid three-dimensional passive rotation micromixer using the breakup process. J Micromech Microeng 14:6–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schönfeld F, Hardt S (2004) Simulation of helical flows in microchannels. AIChE J 50: 771–778Google Scholar
  27. Schönfeld F, Hessel V, Hofmann C (2004) An optimised split-and-recombine micro mixer with uniform ‘chaotic’ mixing. Lab Chip 4:65–69Google Scholar
  28. Schwesinger N, Frank T, Wurmus H (1996) A modular microfluid system with an integrated micromixer. J Micromech Microeng 6:99–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stroock AD, Dertinger SKW, Ajdari A, Mezić I, Stone HA, Whitesides GM (2002a) Chaotic mixer for microchannnels. Science 295:647–651CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Stroock AD, Dertinger SKW, Whitesides GM, Ajdari A (2002b) Patterning flows using grooved surfaces. Anal Chem 74:5306–5312Google Scholar
  31. Veenstra TT, Lammerink TSJ, Elwenspoek MC, van den Berg A (1998) Characterization method for a new diffusion mixer applicable in micro flow injection analysis systems. J Micromech Microeng 9:199–202Google Scholar
  32. Wang G, Vanka SP (1995) Convective heat transfer in periodic wavy passages. Int J Heat Mass Transf 38:3219–3230Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Hardt
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. S. Drese
    • 2
  • V. Hessel
    • 2
  • F. Schönfeld
    • 2
  1. 1.Chair of Technical ThermodynamicsDarmstadt University of TechnologyDarmstadtGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Microtechnology MainzMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations