Gynecological Surgery

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 57–62 | Cite as

Robotic vaginally assisted NOTES hysterectomy: the first case series demonstrating a new surgical technique

Techniques and Instrumentation

Abstract

The objective of this case report is to demonstrate a new hysterectomy technique via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using robotic surgery. Previous experience with the Da Vinci Xi (Intuitive Surgery) for gynaecological oncology, and with NOTES for adnexal surgery and hysterectomy, led to the decision to combine the advantages of these techniques, namely to reduce the invasiveness of robotic surgery and improve the ergonomics of NOTES. A robotic vaginally assisted NOTES hysterectomy (VANH) was performed in five patients with a myomatous uterus. The circumcision of the cervix, the opening of the anterior and posterior peritoneum and the transection of both sacro-uterine ligaments were performed by classical vaginal surgery. A NOTES port was constructed by assembling a surgical glove, a wound protector, 4 Da Vinci 8-mm trocars and 1 reusable 5-mm trocar. The ring of the wound protector was then inserted transvaginally into the peritoneal cavity to create a pneumoperitoneum. The hysterectomy was performed via transvaginal NOTES using the surgical robot. Subsequently, a bilateral adnexectomy was performed in the same way. Once the hysterectomy and bilateral adnexectomy were completed, the robot and gloveport were removed. When the uterus was too large to extract in toto, it was manually morcellated so that it could be removed vaginally. The colpotomy was closed as in classical vaginal surgery. This is the first case report demonstrating that vaginal robotic surgery is possible and that it can be used to perform a hysterectomy. Robotic vaginally assisted NOTES hysterectomy (RVANH) makes use of the advantages of robotic surgery to broaden the indications for vaginal hysterectomy and can help overcome its limitations, while the NOTES approach avoids abdominal wall wounds and trocar-related complications. Further developments in robotic technology will help overcome the problem of robotic arm collision. Robotic hysterectomy via vaginal access is a novel approach that requires further validation. The extra cost and setup time of RVANH will also need to be assessed in comparison to the advantages it provides over a vaginally assisted NOTES hysterectomy or total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Keywords

Hysterectomy Vaginal Notes Robotic Vanh Rvanh Vamis 

Supplementary material

ESM 1

(MP4 20.6 mb)

References

  1. 1.
    Burpee SE, Kurian M, Murakame Y, Benevides S, Gagner M (2002) The metabolic and immune response to laparoscopic versus open liver resection. Surg Endosc 16(6):899–904CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grande M, Tucci GF, Adorisio O, et al. (2002) Systemic acute-phase response after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 16(2):313–316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rattner D, Kalloo A (2006) ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. October 2005. Surg Endosc 20:329–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Santos BF, Hungness ES (2011) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: progress in humans since white paper. World J Gastroenterol 17:1655–1665PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tolcher MC, Kalogera E, Hopkins MR, Weaver AL, Bingener J, Dowdy SC (2012) Safety of culdotomy as a surgical approach: implications for natural orifice transluminal. Jsls 16:413–420PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Su H, Yen CF, Wu KY, Han CM, Lee CL (2012) Hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): feasibility of an innovative approach. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 51:217–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, Wu PJ, Han CM, Yen CF (2014) Hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a series of 137 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(5):814–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferrari MM, Mezzopane R, Bulfoni A, et al. (2003) Surgical treatment of ovarian dermoid cysts: a comparison between laparoscopic and vaginal removal. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 109:88–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, et al. (2009) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD003677Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hackethal A, Sucke J, Oehmke F, et al. (2010) Establishing transvaginal NOTES for gynecological and surgical indications: benefits, limits, and patient experience. Endoscopy 42:875–878CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zornig C, Mofid H, Siemssen L, et al. (2009) Transvaginal NOTES hybrid cholecystectomy: feasibility results in 68 cases with mid-term follow-up. Endoscopy 41:391–394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, Ueng SH, Yen CH (2012) Transvaginal natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in adnexal procedures. Jmig 19:509–513Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyAZ Imelda HospitalBonheidenBelgium

Personalised recommendations