Advertisement

Journal of Medical Ultrasonics

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 161–165 | Cite as

A case of successful transluminal drainage of walled-off necrosis under contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography guidance

  • Kosuke Minaga
  • Mamoru TakenakaEmail author
  • Shunsuke Omoto
  • Takeshi Miyata
  • Ken Kamata
  • Kentaro Yamao
  • Hajime Imai
  • Tomohiro Watanabe
  • Masayuki Kitano
  • Masatoshi Kudo
Case Report

Abstract

We report a case of successful transluminal drainage of walled-off necrosis (WON) under contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CH-EUS) guidance. Recently, EUS-guided transluminal drainage (EUS-TD) of WON has been increasingly used as a minimally invasive treatment option with reportedly high technical and clinical success rates; however, B-mode EUS occasionally fails to depict the target lesion and its margins, particularly in cases where the target shows a heterogeneous echogenicity. In our case, EUS-TD was attempted for infected WON, but visualization using B-mode EUS imaging was poor. Thus, CH-EUS was performed to enhance the contrast between the targeted WON and its surrounding tissues. Immediately after injecting a sonographic contrast agent, WON and its margins were clearly identified as an avascular area and were punctured under CH-EUS guidance. CH-EUS enables the assessment of the microvasculature and hemodynamics of the target lesion in real time. It may also provide valuable information and could be a useful modality for EUS-TD to clearly visualize target lesions and their margins and to decisively puncture them, even when they could not be identified using B-mode EUS.

Keywords

Acute necrotizing pancreatitis Bile ducts Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Endoscopic ultrasonography Sonazoid 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Kosuke Minaga, Mamoru Takenaka, Shunsuke Omoto, Takeshi Miyata, Ken Kamata, Kentaro Yamao, Hajime Imai, Tomohiro Watanabe, Masayuki Kitano, and Masatoshi Kudo declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statements

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent was obtained from the patient for being included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62:102–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baron TH, Thaggard WG, Morgan DE, et al. Endoscopic therapy for organized pancreatic necrosis. Gastroenterology. 1996;111:755–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Varadarajulu S, Phadnis MA, Christein JD, et al. Multiple transluminal gateway technique for EUS-guided drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:74–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bapaye A, Dubale NA, Sheth KA, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transmural drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis: comparison between a specially designed fully covered bi-flanged metal stent and multiple plastic stents. Dig Endosc. 2017;29:104–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Papachristou GI, Takahashi N, Chahal P, et al. Peroral endoscopic drainage/debridement of walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Ann Surg. 2007;245:943–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Frey H. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound with low mechanical index: a new technique. Z Gastroenterol. 2005;43:1219–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kitano M, Kudo M, Sakamoto H, et al. Preliminary study of contrast enhanced harmonic endosonography with second-generation contrast agents. J Med Ultrasonics. 2008;35:11–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alvarez-Sánchez MV, Napoléon B. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound imaging: basic principles, present situation and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:15549–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kitano M, Kamata K. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound: future perspectives. Endosc Ultrasound. 2016;5:351–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, et al. Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology. 1990;174:331–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013;13:e1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Trikudanathan G, Attam R, Arain MA, et al. Endoscopic interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:969–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, et al. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1491–502.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Akshintala VS, Saxena P, Zaheer A, et al. A comparative evaluation of outcomes of endoscopic versus percutaneous drainage for symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:921–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, et al. Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:583–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Varadarajulu S, Christein JD, Tamhane A, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing EUS and EGD for transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:1102–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fabbri C, Luigiano C, Lisotti A, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatments: are we getting evidence based: a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:8424–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van Brunschot S, Fockens P, Bakker OJ, et al. Endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy in necrotising pancreatitis: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1425–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kitano M, Sakamoto H, Matsui U, et al. A novel perfusion imaging technique of the pancreas: contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:141–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fusaroli P, Spada A, Mancino MG, et al. Contrast harmonic echo-endoscopic ultrasound improves accuracy in diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:629–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Imazu H, Mori N, Kanazawa K, et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of gallbladder wall thickening. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59:1909–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Choi JH, Seo DW, Choi JH, et al. Utility of contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS in the diagnosis of malignant gallbladder polyps (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:484–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Matsui S, et al. Estimation of malignant potential of GI stromal tumors by contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:227–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yamashita Y, Kato J, Ueda K, et al. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography can predict a higher malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumors by visualizing large newly formed vessels. J Clin Ultrasound. 2015;43:89–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Miyata T, Kitano M, Omoto S, et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for assessment of lymph node metastases in pancreatobiliary carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;28:3381–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Minaga K, Kitano M, Yoshikawa T, et al. Hepaticogastrostomy guided by real-time contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography: a novel technique. Endoscopy. 2016;48:E228–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kosuke Minaga
    • 1
  • Mamoru Takenaka
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shunsuke Omoto
    • 1
  • Takeshi Miyata
    • 1
  • Ken Kamata
    • 1
  • Kentaro Yamao
    • 1
  • Hajime Imai
    • 1
  • Tomohiro Watanabe
    • 1
  • Masayuki Kitano
    • 2
  • Masatoshi Kudo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyKindai University Faculty of MedicineOsaka-SayamaJapan
  2. 2.Second Department of Internal MedicineWakayama Medical University School of MedicineWakayamaJapan

Personalised recommendations