Advertisement

Journal of Medical Ultrasonics

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 71–76 | Cite as

Evaluation of the stability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque with contrast-enhanced ultrasound

  • Xiao-Feng SunEmail author
  • Jun Wang
  • Xiao-Li Wu
  • Hui-Ying Xu
  • Ying-Qi Xing
  • Fang Yang
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to determine the stability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque (CAP) using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

Methods

CEUS images of 93 patients were evaluated to observe new vessels within CAPs. Microembolic signals (MES) were detected using transcranial Doppler (TCD). Thirty-four patients with hyperechoic plaques were evaluated as the control group.

Results

Eighty percent (75/93) of plaques showed contrast enhancement on CEUS, including 50.7 % (38/75) of hypoechoic plaques and 49.3 % (37/75) of mixed echoic plaques. No plaques in the control group showed enhancement on CEUS. With TCD, 35.5 % (33/93) of patients were positive for MES. Plaques with grade 2 or 3 enhancement on CEUS had a higher positive rate for MES. Forty-one patients with grade 2 or 3 enhancement on CEUS presented with fresh infarctions confirmed by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Conclusions

In conclusion, grade 2 or 3 contrast enhancement observed on CEUS indicated vulnerable plaques.

Keywords

Carotid atheromatous plaque Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Neovascularization Transcranial Doppler (TCD) Microembolus signal (MES) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Contract grant sponsor: Science and Technology Development Projects of Jilin Province (major project) (contract grant number: 20110485) and Health Department Projects of Jilin Province (contract grant number: 2011Z065).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest in connection with this paper.

Ethical considerations

All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. The study protocol was approved by our hospital ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from all study participants prior to the ultrasound examination.

References

  1. 1.
    Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127:e6–245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fayad ZA, Fuster V. Clinical imaging of the high-risk or vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque. Circ Res. 2001;89:305–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kramer CM. Magnetic resonance imaging to identify the high-risk plaque. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:L15–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sadat U, Weerakkody RA, Bowden DJ, et al. Utility of high resolution MR imaging to assess carotid plaque morphology: a comparison of acute symptomatic, recently symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 2009;207:434–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Perrone-Filardi P, Dellegrottaglie S, Rudd JH, et al. Molecular imaging of atherosclerosis in translational medicine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:969–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aldemir E, Apaydin M, Varer M, et al. Echolucency of carotid plaques and cerebrovascular events. J Clin Ultrasound. 2012;40:399–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jeziorska M, Woolley DE. Local neovascularization and cellular composition within vulnerable regions of atherosclerotic plaques of human carotid arteries. J Pathol. 1999;188:189–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feinstein SB. Contrast ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery vasa vasorum and atherosclerotic plaque neovascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:236–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shah F, Balan P, Weinberg M, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of atherosclerotic carotid plaque neovascularization: a new surrogate marker of atherosclerosis? Vasc Med. 2007;12:291–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Granada JF, Feinstein SB. Imaging of the vasa vasorum. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008;5:S18–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Staub D, Partovi S, Imfeld S, et al. Novel applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in vascular medicine. Vasa. 2013;42:17–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zwiebel WJ, Pellerito JS. Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier Science; 2004. (Translated by Chao-Yang Wen. Beijing: People’s Military Medical Press, 2008).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Coli S, Magnoni M, Sangiorgi G, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of intraplaque neovascularization in carotid arteries: correlation with histology and plaque echogenicity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:223–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Consensus Committee of the Ninth International Cerebral Hemodynamic Symposium. Basic identification criteria of Doppler microembolic signals. Stroke. 1995;26:1123.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Faggioli GL, Pini R, Mauro R, et al. Identification of carotid ‘vulnerable plaque’ by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: correlation with plaque histology, symptoms and cerebral computed tomography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41:238–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Giannoni MF, Vicenzini E, Citone M, et al. Contrast carotid ultrasound for the detection of unstable plaques with neoangiogenesis: a pilot study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37:722–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Staub D, Patel MB, Tibrewala A, et al. Vasa vasorum and plaque neovascularization on contrast-enhanced carotid ultrasound imaging correlates with cardiovascular disease and past cardiovascular events. Stroke. 2010;41:41–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Owen DR, Lindsay AC, Choudhury RP, et al. Imaging of atherosclerosis. Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:25–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rajaram V, Pandhya S, Patel S, et al. Role of surrogate markers in assessing patients with diabetes mellitus and the metabolic syndrome and in evaluating lipid-lowering therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:32–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clevert DA, Sommer WH, Helck A, et al. Improved carotid atherosclerotic plaques imaging with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2011;48:141–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van Zuilen EV, Van Gijn J, Ackerstaff RG. The clinical relevance of cerebral microemboli detection by transcranial Doppler ultrasound. J Neuroimaging. 1998;8:32–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cheung RT. Early ischemic recurrence and microembolic signals detected by transcranial Doppler. Stroke. 1999;30:1290–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Feinstein SB. Contrast ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery vasa vasorum and atherosclerotic plaque neovascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:236–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiao-Feng Sun
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jun Wang
    • 1
  • Xiao-Li Wu
    • 1
  • Hui-Ying Xu
    • 1
  • Ying-Qi Xing
    • 2
  • Fang Yang
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of UltrasoundThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchunChina
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchunChina
  3. 3.International Health Promotion CenterThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations