Effect of Urbanization on Neospora caninum Seroprevalence in White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus)
- 15 Downloads
The protozoan Neospora caninum is transmitted between domestic and wildlife species. Urbanized environments and deer density may facilitate this transmission and play a critical role in the spillover of N. caninum from domestic animals to wildlife. White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus; WTD) are an important intermediate host for maintaining the sylvatic cycle of N. caninum in the USA. Here, we assayed serum samples from 444 WTD from a nature reservation across a suburban to urban gradient in Ohio, USA. Antibodies to N. caninum were found by using a recombinant NcGRA6 ELISA in 23.6% (105/444). Significant risk factors for seropositivity were age class and urbanization. Deer from urbanized environments were at greater odds of being seropositive (89/323, 27.6%) than those from suburban habitats (16/121, 13.2%), and this difference persisted when adjusting for age and sex. Age was also a significant risk factor with adults at greater odds to be seropositive than fawns and yearlings. We speculate the main route of exposure in WTD is ingestion of N. caninum oocysts from contaminated environments and urbanized habitats facilitate this exposure.
KeywordsNeospora caninum Ohio Seroprevalence White-tailed deer Urbanization
The authors would like to thank the Cleveland Metroparks staff for assistance with sample collection. This project was funded by the Cleveland Metroparks Zoo.
- Ballash GA, Dubey JP, Kwok OC, Shoben AB, Robison TL, Kraft TJ, Dennis PM. (2015) Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and free-roaming cats (Felis catus) across a suburban to urban gradient in northeastern Ohio. EcoHealth 12(2):359-367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barling KS, Sherman M, Peterson MJ, Thompson JA, McNeill JW, Craig TM, Adams LG. (2000) Spatial associations among density of cattle, abundance of wild canids, and seroprevalence to Neospora caninum in a population of beef calves. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 2217: 1361–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dubey JP, Hemphill A, Calero-Bernal R, Schares G. (2017) Neosporosis In Animals. CRC Press. Boca Raton, Florida. 1-529.Google Scholar
- Dubey JP, Jenkins MC, Kwok OCH, Zink RL, Michalski ML, Ulrich V, Gill J, Carstensen M, Thulliez P. (2009) Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) from Iowa and Minnesota using four serologic tests. Veterinary Parasitology 161(3-4):330-334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schares G, Barwald A, Staubach C, Ziller M, Kloss D, Wurm R, Rauser M, Labohm R, Drager K, Fasen W, Hess RG, Conraths FJ. (2003) Regional distribution of bovine Neospora caninum infection in the German state of Rhineland-Palatinate modeled by logistic regression. International Journal of Parasitology 33(14):1631-1640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- von Blumroder D, Stambusch R, Labohm R, Klawonn W, Drager K, Fasen W, Contraths FJ, Schares G. (2006) Potential risk factors for the serological detection of Neospora caninum-infections in cattle in Rhineland-Palatinate (Germany). Tierarztliche Praxis Grobtiere 34:141-147.Google Scholar