EcoHealth

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 535–548 | Cite as

The Role of Gender in Chagas Disease Prevention and Control in Honduras: An Analysis of Communication and Collaboration Networks

  • Diana Rocío Rodríguez Triana
  • Frédéric Mertens
  • Concepción Valeriano Zúniga
  • Yolanda Mendoza
  • Eduardo Yoshio Nakano
  • Maria Carlota Monroy
Original Contribution

Abstract

In Honduras, where Chagas disease is a serious health and environmental concern, prevention measures face the challenge of achieving widespread and long-term sustainable adoption by communities. The article integrates social network analysis and a gender-sensitive approach to understand the role of men and women in the implementation of a community-level intervention, based on the adoption of housing improvements to reduce the presence of the insect vector. A total of 108 people in the community of El Salitre were interviewed. Data were collected on socio-demographic characteristics, participation in project activities, communication and collaboration networks related to Chagas disease prevention, knowledge of Chagas disease, and adoption of housing improvements techniques. Communication mostly occurred between the same gender individuals and was associated with knowledge of Chagas disease. Socioeconomic status, Chagas disease knowledge, and collaboration with men were associated with women adopting housing improvements. For men, however, participation in project activities, formal education, and collaboration with women were associated with adoption. These findings suggest that men and women were driven by distinct concerns, interests, and motivations when adopting new Chagas disease prevention strategies. Participatory community interventions that seek to generate health knowledge and foster collaborations to reduce health risk should address gender differences.

Keywords

social network analysis Chagas disease gender ecohealth diffusion of health innovation health prevention 

References

  1. Adewuyi A, Ogunjuyigbe P (2003) The role of men in family planning: an examination of men´s knowledge and attitude to contraceptive use among Yorubas. African Population Studies 18:35–49Google Scholar
  2. Affleck W, Pelto G (2012) Caregivers´ responses to an intervention to improve young child feeding behaviors in rural bangladesh: a mixed method study of the facilitators and barriers to change. Social Science and Medicine 75:651-658CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrzejewski C, Reed H, White M (2009) Does where you live influence what you know? community effects in health knowledge in Ghana. Health and Place 15:228-238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ardón L, Mazariegos L (2007) Control y prevención de la enfermedad de Chagas: una experiencia de participación comunitaria para compartir. IDRC, Secretaria de Salud, JICA, OPS, Visión MundialGoogle Scholar
  5. Armitage D, Marschke M, Plummer R (2008) Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global environmental change 18:86-98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker S (1996) Couples and reproductive health: a review of couple studies. Studies in Family Planning 27:291-306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Berbés-Blázquez M, Oestreicher J S, Mertens F, Saint-Charles J (2014). Ecohealth and resilience thinking: a dialog from experiences in research and practice. Ecology and Society 19(2):24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bodin Ö, Crona BI (2009) The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global environmental change 19(3):366-374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borgatti SP (2002) NetDraw: Graph visualization software. Harvard: Analytic TechnologiesGoogle Scholar
  10. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. Bustamante DM, Monroy C, Pineda S, Rodas A, Castro X, Ayala V, Quiñonez J, Moguel B, Trampe R (2009) Risk factors for intra-domiciliary infestation by the Chagas disease vector Triatoma dimidiata in Jutiapa, Guatemala. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 25 Suppl 1:S83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Caldwell J C (1994) How is greater maternal education translated into lower child mortality? Health transition review 4(2):224-229Google Scholar
  13. Charron DF (2012) Ecossystem approaches to health for a global sustainability agenda. EcoHealth 9(3):256-266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cissna K, Frey L (2009) Introduction. In: Routledge Handbook of Applied Communication Research. Frey L, Cissna K (editors), New York, Taylor and Francis Press, pp 257-272Google Scholar
  15. Cornwall A (2003) Whose Voices? Whose Choices? reflections on gender and participatory development. World Development 31:1325-1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cornwall A, Jewkes R (1995) What is participatory research? Social science & medicine 41(12):1667-1676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davey-Rothwell M, Latkin C (2007) Gender differences in social network influence among injection drug users: Perceived norms and needle sharing. Journal of Urban Health, 84(5), 691-703.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Doss C, Morris M (2001) How does gender affect the adoption of agricultural innovations? Agricultural Economics 25:27-39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dredge D (2006) Networks, conflict and collaborative communities. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 14:562-581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:441-473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frost M B, Forste R, Haas D W (2005) Maternal education and child nutritional status in Bolivia: finding the links. Social Science and Medicine 60:395-407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuhrer R, Stansfeld SA (2002) How gender affects patterns of social relations and their impact on health: a comparison of one multiple sources of support from “close persons”. Social Science and Medicine 54:811-825CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gage AJ (1995) Women’s socioeconomic position and contraceptive behavior in Togo. Studies in Family Planning 26:264-277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Go V F, Quan V M, Voytek C, Celentano D (2006) Intra-couple communication dynamics of HIV risk behavior among injecting drug users and their sexual partners in northern Vietnam. Drug and alcohol dependence 84:69-76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Guhl F (2007) Epidemiología de la enfermedad de Chagas en Latinoamérica y Colombia. In: Enfermedad de Chagas. Rosas F, Vanegas D, Cabrales M (editors), Bogotá D.C, Sociedad Colombiana de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular, Panamericana Formas e Impresos Press, pp 7-14Google Scholar
  26. Hogan DP, Berhanu B, Hailemariam A (1999) Household organization, women’s autonomy, and contraceptive behavior in Southern Ethiopia. Studies in Family Planning 30:302-314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kreps G, Bonaguro E (2009) Health communication as applied communication inquiry. In: Routledge Handbook of Applied Communication Research. Frey L, Cissna K (editors), New York, Taylor and Francis Press, pp 380-404Google Scholar
  28. Lucero D, Morrissey L, Rizzo D, Rodas A, Garnica R, Stevens L, Bustamante D, Monroy C (2013) Ecohealth interventions limit triatomine reinfestation following insecticide spraying in La Brea, Guatemala. American Journal Troprical Medicine Hygene 88:630-637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luke DA, Harris JK (2007) Network analysis in public health: history, methods, and applications. Annual Reviews of Public Health 28:69-93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marin A, Wellman B (2011) Social network analysis: an introduction. In: The SAGE handbook of social network analysis, J. Scott and P J Carrington (editors), Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Press, pp 11-25Google Scholar
  31. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology 27:415-444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mergler D (2012) Neurotoxic exposures and effects: gender and sex matter! Hänninen Lecture 2011, Neurotoxicology 33(4):644-651.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Mertens F, Saint-Charles J, Lucotte M, Mergler D (2008) Emergence and robustness of a community discussion network on mercury contamination and health in the Brazilian Amazon. Health Education & Behavior 35(4):509-521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mertens F, Saint-Charles J, Mergler D (2012) Social Communication network analysis of the role of participatory research in the adoption of new fish consumption behaviors, Social Science and Medicine 75:643-650CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mertens F, Saint-Charles J, Mergler D, Passos CJ, Lucotte M (2005) Network approach for analyzing and promoting equity in participatory ecohealth research. EcoHealth 2(2):113-126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moncayo A, Silveira AC (2009) Current epidemiological trends for Chagas disease in Latin America and future challenges in epidemiology, surveillance and health policy. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Vol. 104(Suppl. I): 17-30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Monroy C, Bustamante DM, Pineda S, Rodas A, Castro X, Ayala V, Quiñonez J, Moguel B (2009) House improvements and community participation in the control of Triatoma dimidiata re-infestation in Jutiapa, Guatemala. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 25 Suppl 1: S168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Monroy C, Bustamante DM, Rodas A, Enriquez E, Rosales R (2003) Habitats, Dispersion and Invasion of Sylvatic Triatoma dimidiata (Hemiptera: Reduviidae Triatominae) in Peten, Guatemala. Journal of Medical Entomology 40(6):800–806CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Monroy C, Castro X, Bustamante DM, Pineda SS, Rodas A, Moguel B, Ayala V, Quiñones J (2012) An ecosystem approach for the prevention of Chagas disease in rural Guatemala. In: Ecohealth research in practice: innovate applications in ecosystem approach to health, Charron DF (Editor), New York: Springer Press, pp 153-162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pellecer M, Dorn P, Bustamante D, Rodas A, Monroy C (2013) Vector blood meals are an early indicator of the effectiveness of ecohealth approach in halting Chagas transmission in Guatemala. The American Journal Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 88:638-644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rogers E M (2003) Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
  42. Saint-Charles J, Rioux-Pelletier M-E, Mongeau P, Mertens F (2012) Diffusion of environmental health information: the role of sex- and gender-differentiated pathways. In “What a Difference Sex and Gender Make: A Gender, Sex and Health Research Casebook”, Institute of Gender and Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, pp 69-76Google Scholar
  43. Sarkar S, Strutz S, Frank D, Rivaldi C, Sissel B, Sánchez-Cordero V (2010) Chagas disease risk in Texas. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 4:1-14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scott J (2013) Social Network Analysis. Third edition, London: SAGEGoogle Scholar
  45. Secretaria de Salud - JICA (2011) Proyecto de control de la enfermedad de Chagas Fase 2 (2008-2011). Informe Final. Tegucigalpa, HondurasGoogle Scholar
  46. Sharan M, Valente T W (2002) Spousal communication and family planning adoption: effects of a radio drama serial in Nepal. International Family Planning Perspectives 28:16-25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stoebenau K, Valente TW (2003) Using network analysis to understand community-based programs: a case study from highland Madagascar. International Family Planning Perspectives 29:167–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. UNICEF (2002) Escuela y casa saludable: Una experiencia exitosa en Honduras. Available: http://www.wsp.org/Hygiene-Sanitation-Water-Toolkit/Resources/Readings/UNICEF-Honduras.pdf [accessed January 25, 2016]
  49. Valente T (2005) Network models and methods for studying the difussion of innovations. In: Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, Carrington P, Scott J, Wasserman S (editors), New York: Cambridge Press, pp 98-109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Valente T W, Davis R L (1999) Accelerating the diffusion of innovations using opinion leaders. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 566:55-67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Valente TW, Fosados R (2006) Diffusion of innovations and network segmentation: the part played by people in promoting health. Sexually transmitted diseases 33(7):S23-S31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Valente TW, Watkins SC, Jato MN, Van Der Straten A, Tsitsol LPM (1997) Social network associations with contraceptive use among Cameroonian women in voluntary associations. Social science & medicine 45(5):677-687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Viotti R, Vigliano CA, Alvarez MG, Lococo BE, Petti MA, Bertocchi GL, Armenti AH (2009) El impacto de las condiciones socioeconómicas en la evolución de la enfermedad de Chagas crónica. Revista Española Cardiologia 62:1224-1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vlassoff C, Bonilla E (1994) Gender-related differences in the impact of tropical diseases on women: what do we know? Journal of biosocial science 26(1):37-53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Vlassoff C, Moreno CG (2002) Placing gender at the centre of health programming: challenges and limitations, Social science & medicine 54(11):1713-1723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis – methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. WHO (2007) Reporte sobre la enfermedad de Chagas. Buenos Aires Argentina. Available: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2007/TDR_SWG_09_spa.pdf [accessed January 25, 2016]
  58. WHO (2015) Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis) - Fact sheet N°340, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs340/en/ [accessed January 25, 2016]

Copyright information

© International Association for Ecology and Health 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana Rocío Rodríguez Triana
    • 1
  • Frédéric Mertens
    • 1
    • 2
  • Concepción Valeriano Zúniga
    • 3
  • Yolanda Mendoza
    • 4
  • Eduardo Yoshio Nakano
    • 5
  • Maria Carlota Monroy
    • 6
  1. 1.Centro de Desenvolvimento SustentávelUniversidade de BrasíliaBrasíliaBrazil
  2. 2.Community of Practice in Ecosystem Approaches to Health in Latin America and the Caribbean (CoPEH-LAC)BrasíliaBrazil
  3. 3.Departamento de Vigilancia de la SaludHospital Escuela UniversitarioTegucigalpaHonduras
  4. 4.Ecohealth Field Building Leadership in Prevention and Control of Vector Borne Diseases in Latin America and the CaribbeanTegucigalpaHonduras
  5. 5.Department of StatisticsUniversity of BrasiliaBrasíliaBrazil
  6. 6.Laboratorio de entomologia aplicada y ParasitologíaUniversidad de San CarlosGuatemalaGuatemala

Personalised recommendations