Advertisement

EcoHealth

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 693–702 | Cite as

Citizen Science and Wildlife Disease Surveillance

  • Becki Lawson
  • Silviu O. Petrovan
  • Andrew A. Cunningham
Review

Abstract

Achieving effective wildlife disease surveillance is challenging. The incorporation of citizen science (CS) in wildlife health surveillance can be beneficial, particularly where resources are limited and cost-effectiveness is paramount. Reports of wildlife morbidity and mortality from the public facilitate large-scale surveillance, both in time and space, which would otherwise be financially infeasible, and raise awareness of incidents occurring on privately owned land. CS wildlife disease surveillance schemes benefit scientists, the participating public and wildlife alike. CS has been employed for targeted, scanning and syndromic surveillance of wildlife disease. Whilst opportunistic surveillance is most common, systematic observations enable the standardisation of observer effort and, combined with wildlife population monitoring schemes, can allow evaluation of disease impacts at the population level. Near-universal access to digital media has revolutionised reporting modalities and facilitated rapid and economical means of sharing feedback with participants. Here we review CS schemes for wildlife disease surveillance and highlight their scope, benefits, logistical considerations, financial implications and potential limitations. The need to adopt a collaborative and multidisciplinary approach to wildlife health surveillance is increasingly recognised and the general public can make a significant contribution through CS.

Keywords

Scanning Targeted Opportunistic Systematic Syndromic surveillance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Tim Hopkins (Institute of Zoology), Kirsi Peck (Royal Society for the Protection of Birds), Kate Risely (British Trust for Ornithology) and Freya Smith (Animal Plant & Health Agency) for their constructive feedback on this manuscript. BL was awarded a Winston Churchill Memorial Trust Travel Fellowship to study citizen science approaches to national wildlife health surveillance. AAC is part-funded by a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit award. AAC and BL are recipients of funding from the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Strategic Evidence Fund (Contract WC 1027 & WC 1099). SOP is supported by a grant from the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation.

References

  1. AshTag (2014) Helping the Ash Tree Fight Back. https://www.ashtag.org/. Accessed Feb 20, 2015
  2. August T, Harvey M, Lightfoot P, Kilbey D, Papadopoulos T, Jepson P (2015) Emerging technologies for biological recording. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 115:731–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balcomb R (1986) Songbird carcasses disappear rapidly from agricultural fields. Auk 103:817-820Google Scholar
  4. Banyard AC, Hayman D, Johnson N, McElhinney L, Fooks AR (2011) Bats and lyssaviruses. Advances in Virus Research 79:239-289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckmann KM, Borel N, Pocknell AM, Dagleish MP, Sachse A, John SK, et al. (2014) Chlamydiosis in British garden birds (2005-2011): retrospective diagnosis and Chlamydia psittaci genotype determination. Ecohealth 11(4):544-563PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonney R, Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Kelling S, Phillips T, Rosenberg KV, et al. (2009) Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience 59(11):977-984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonter DN, Cooper CB (2012) Data validation in citizen science: a case study from Project FeederWatch. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(6):305-307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. British Trust for Ornithology (BTO) (2015) http://www.bto.org/volunteer-surveys/gbw. Accessed July 3, 2015
  9. Cannon AR, Chamberlain DE, Toms MP, Hatchwell BJ, Gaston KJ (2005) Trends in the use of private gardens by wild birds in Great Britain 1995-2002. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:659-671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carrier J, Beebee TJC (2003) Recent, substantial, and unexplained declines of the common toad Bufo bufo in lowland England. Biological Conservation 111:395–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Citizen Science Central (2014) http://www.birds.cornell.edu/citscitoolkit. Accessed February 20, 2015
  12. Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Phillips T, Bonney R (2007) Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecology and Society 12(2):11Google Scholar
  13. Cooper CB, Loyd KAT, Murante T, Savoca M, Dickinson J (2012) Natural history traits associated with detecting mortality within residential bird communities: can citizen science provide insights? Environmental Management 50(1):11-20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cunningham AA, Langton TES, Bennett PM, Lewin JF, Drury SEN, Gough RE, Macgregor SK (1996) Pathological and microbiological findings from incidents of unusual mortality of the common frog (Rana temporaria). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London: Series BBiological Sciences 351:1539-1557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dallimer M, Irvine KN, Skinner AMJ, Davies ZG, Rouquette JR, Maltby LL, et al. (2012) Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. BioScience 62:47-55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davies ZG, Fuller RA, Dallimer M, Loram A, Gaston KJ (2012) Household factors influencing participation in bird feeding activity: a national scale analysis. PLoS One (doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039692, Online June 28, 2012)
  17. Dickinson JL, Zuckerberg B, Bonter DN (2010) Citizen Science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 41:149-172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dickinson JL, Shirk J, Bonter D, Bonney R, Crain RL, Martin J, et al. (2012) The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(6):291-297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunn EH (1993) Bird mortality from striking residential windows in winter. Journal of Field Ornithology 64(3):302-309Google Scholar
  20. Dunn EH, Tessaglia DL (1994) Predation of birds at feeders in winter. Journal of Field Ornithology 65(1):8-16Google Scholar
  21. Eidson M, Komar N, Sorhage F, Nelson R, Talbot T, Mostashari F (2001) Crow deaths as a sentinel surveillance system for West Nile virus in the northeastern United States, 1999. Emerging Infectious Diseases 7(4):615-620PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Epicollect (2014) http://www.epicollect.net/. Accessed Feb 20, 2015
  23. Froglife Toads on Roads Survey (2014) http://www.froglife.org/what-we-do/toads-on-roads/. Accessed Feb 20, 2015
  24. Garden Wildlife Health (GWH) (2014) http://www.gardenwildlifehealth.org/. Accessed Feb 20, 2015
  25. Gardiner MM, Allee LL, Brown PMJ, Losey JE, Roy HE, Rice Smyth R (2012) Lessons from lady beetles: accuracy of monitoring data from US and UK citizen science programs. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(9):471-476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garner JT, Garner LT (2010) Volunteering an opinion: organizational voice and volunteer retention in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40(5):813–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greenwood JJD (2007) Citizens, science and bird conservation. Journal of Ornithology 148(S1):S77-S124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goldstein EA, Lawton C, Sheehy E, Butler F (2014) Locating species range frontiers: a cost and efficiency comparison of citizen science and hair-tube survey methods for use in tracking an invasive squirrel. Wildlife Research 41:64-75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gourlay, P., Decors, A., Moinet, A., Lambert, O., Lawson, B., Beaudeau, F., et al. (2014) The potential capacity of French wildlife centres for wild bird disease surveillance. European Journal of Wildlife Research 60:865-873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Handel CM, Pajot LM, Matsuoka SM, van Hemert C, Terenzi J, Talbot SL, et al. (2010) Epizootic of beak deformities among wild birds in Alaska: an emerging disease in North America? Auk 127(4):882-898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hars J, Ruette S, Benmergui M, Fouque C, Fournier JY, Legouge A, et al. (2008) The epidemiology of the highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza in Mute Swan (Cygnus olor) and other Anatidae in the Dombes region (France), 2006. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 44(4):811-823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hawkins CE, Baars C, Hesterman H, Hocking GJ, Jones ME, Lazenby B, et al. (2006) Emerging disease and population decline of an island endemic, the Tasmanian devil Sarcophilus harrisii. Biological Conservation 131(2):307-324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haywood BK, Besley JC (2014) Education, outreach, and inclusive engagement: towards integrated indicators of successful program outcomes in participatory science. Public Understanding of Science 23:92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hochachka WM, Dhondt AA (2000) Density-dependent decline of host abundance resulting from a new infectious disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 97(10):5303-5306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Horton D, Lawson B, Egbetade A, Jeffries C, Johnson N, Cunningham AA, et al. (2013) Targeted surveillance for Usutu virus in British birds (2005-2011). Veterinary Record 172:17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. iSpot (2015) http://www.ispotnature.org/. Accessed July 6, 2015
  37. Jones DN, Reynolds SJ (2008) Feeding birds in our towns and cities: a global research opportunity. Journal of Avian Biology 39:265-271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. LaDeau SL, Kilpatrick AM, Marra PP (2007) West Nile virus emergence and large-scale declines of North American bird populations. Nature 447:710-713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lake Michigan Volunteer AMBLE (Avian monitoring for botulism lakeshore events) (2014) https://www.nwhc.usgs.gov/amble/. Accessed Feb 20, 2015
  40. Lawson B, Jepson, PD (2004) UK phocine distemper virus epizootic: investigation report 2002/2003. Report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. pp 1–221Google Scholar
  41. Lawson B, Macdonald S, Howard T, Macgregor SK, Cunningham AA (2006) Exposure of garden birds to aflatoxins in Britain. Science of the Total Environment 361:124-131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lawson B, Lachish S, Colvile KM, Durrant C, Peck KM, Toms MP, et al. (2012a) Emergence of a novel avian pox disease in British tit species. PLoS One (doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040176, Online November 21, 2012)
  43. Lawson B, Robinson RA, Colvile KM, Peck KM, Chantrey J, Pennycott TW, et al. (2012b) The emergence and spread of finch trichomonosis in the British Isles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 367:2852-2863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Levrel H, Fontaine B, Henry P-Y, Jiguet F, Juillard R, Kerbiriou C, et al. (2010) Balancing state and volunteer investment in biodiversity monitoring for the implementation of CBD indicators: a French example. Ecological Economics 69:1580-1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maller C, Townsend M, Pryor A, Brown P, St Leger L (2005) Health nature healthy people: ‘contact with nature’ as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promotion International 21(1):45-54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mammals on Roads Survey (2014) http://www.ptes.org/. Accessed Feb 20, 2015
  47. Miller JR (2005) Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20:430-434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miller-Rushing A, Primack R, Bonney R (2012) The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(6):285-290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mulder RA, Guay PJ, Wilson M, Coulson G (2010) Citizen science: recruiting residents for studies of tagged urban wildlife. Wildlife Research 37:440-446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Newman G, Wiggins A, Crall A, Graham E, Newman S, Crowston K (2012) The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(6):298-304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oakmapper (2014) Monitoring Sudden Oak Death. http://www.oakmapper.org/. Accessed Feb 20, 2015)
  52. One Health Commission (2015) Why One Health? https://www.onehealthcommission.org. Accessed July 2, 2015
  53. Osterman Lind E, Juremalm M, Christensson D, Widgren S, Hallgren G, Âgren EO, et al. (2011) First detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in Sweden, February to March 2011. Eurosurveillance 16:1-3Google Scholar
  54. Paterson A (2008) Report of the 2006–2007 South-west England and Cotswolds Survey of Tuberculosis in Deer, Defra. pp 1–37Google Scholar
  55. Pocock MJO, Chapman DS, Sheppard LJ, Roy HE (2014) Choosing and using Citizen science: a guide to when and how to use citizen science to monitor biodiversity and the environment. Wallingford: Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, pp 1–25.Google Scholar
  56. Pocock MJO, Evans DM (2014) The success of the Horse-Chestnut Leaf-Miner, Cameraria ohridella, in the UK revealed with hypothesis-led citizen science. PLoS One (doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086226, Online Jan 22, 2014)
  57. Pocock MJO, Roy HE, Preston CD, Roy, DB (2015) The Biological Records Centre: a pioneer of citizen science. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 115:475-493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Project Splatter (2014) Project Splatter: Creating a UK Map of Wildlife Roadkill. http://projectsplatter.co.uk/. Accessed Feb 20, 2015
  59. Raddick MJ, Bracey G, Gay PL, Lintott CJ, Murray P, Schawinski K, et al. (2010) Galaxy Zoo: exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers. Astronomy Education Review 9(1):2010 (doi: 10.3847/AER2009036, Online February 18, 2010)
  60. Robinson RA, Lawson B, Toms MP, Peck KM, Kirkwood JK, Chantrey J, et al. (2010) Emerging infectious disease leads to rapid population declines of common British birds. PLoS One (doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012215, Online August 18, 2010)
  61. Ryser-Degiorgis MP (2013) Wildlife health investigations: needs, challenges and recommendations. BMC Veterinary Research 9(223):2013 (doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-223, Online November 4, 2013)
  62. Santos SM, Carvalho F, Mira A (2011) How long do the dead survive on the road? Carcass persistence probability and implications for road-kill monitoring surveys. PLoS One (doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025383, Online September 27, 2011)
  63. Schmitt S (2014) The UK Beached Bird Survey 2014. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds Report, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  64. Seabird Ecological Assessment Network (SEANET) (2014). Tufts University Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine. http://www.tufts.edu/vet/seanet/. Accessed Feb 20, 2015
  65. Sleeman JM (2013) Has the time come for big science in wildlife health? Ecohealth 10(4):335-338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Smith FAP (2014) The epidemiology of the amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in the UK. Ph.D thesis. Imperial College, LondonGoogle Scholar
  67. Sorensen A, van Beest FM, Brook RK (2014) Impacts of wildlife baiting and supplemental feeding on infectious disease transmission risk: a synthesis of knowledge. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 113(4):356-363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Szabo JK, Fuller RA, Possingham H (2012) A comparison of estimates of relative abundance from a weakly structured mass-participation bird atlas survey and a robustly designed monitoring scheme. Ibis 154:468-479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Teacher AGF, Cunningham AA, Garner TWJ (2010) Assessing the long-term impact of Ranavirus infection in wild common frog populations. Animal Conservation 13(5):514-522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tobin ME, Dolbeer RA (1990) Disappearance and recoverability of songbird carcasses in fruit orchards. Journal of Field Ornithology 61(2):237-242Google Scholar
  71. Tulloch AIT, Possingham HP, Joseph LN, Szabo J, Martin TG (2013) Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs. Biological Conservation 165:128-138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tweddle JC, Robinson LD, Pocock MJO, Roy HE (2012) Guide to citizen science: developing, implementing, and evaluating citizen science to study biodiversity and the environment in the UK. Wallingford: NERC/Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, pp. 1-29.Google Scholar
  73. Ward MR, Stallknecht DE, Willis J, Conroy MJ, Davidson WR (2006) Wild bird mortality and West Nile virus surveillance: biases associated with detection, reporting and carcass persistence. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 42(1):92-106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Weissenböck H, Kolodziejek J, Fragner K, Kuhn R, Pfeffer M, Nowotny N (2003) Usutu virus activity in Austria, 2001–2002. Microbes and Infection 5:1132–1136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wobeser G, Wobeser AG (1992) Carcass disappearance and estimation of mortality in a simulated die-off of small birds. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 28(4):548-554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wood C, Sullivan B, Iliff M, Fink D, Kelling S (2011) eBird: engaging birds in science and conservation. PLoS Biology (doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001220, Online Dec 20, 2011)

Copyright information

© International Association for Ecology and Health 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Becki Lawson
    • 1
  • Silviu O. Petrovan
    • 2
  • Andrew A. Cunningham
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of ZoologyZoological Society of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.FroglifePeterboroughUK

Personalised recommendations