Trends in Ranavirus Prevalence Among Plethodontid Salamanders in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park
- 464 Downloads
Emerging pathogens are a potential contributor to global amphibian declines. Ranaviruses, which infect ectothermic vertebrates and are common in aquatic environments, have been implicated in die-offs of at least 72 amphibian species worldwide. Most studies on the subject have focused on pool-breeding amphibians, and infection trends in other amphibian species assemblages have been understudied. Our primary study objective was to evaluate hypotheses explaining ranavirus prevalence within a lungless salamander assemblage (Family Plethodontidae) in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA. We sampled 566 total plethodontid salamanders representing 14 species at five sites over a 6-year period (2007–2012). We identified ranavirus-positive individuals in 11 of the 14 (78.6%) sampled species, with salamanders in the genus Desmognathus having greatest infection prevalence. Overall, we found the greatest support for site elevation and sampling year determining infection prevalence. We detected the greatest number of infections in 2007 with 82.5% of sampled individuals testing positive for ranavirus, which we attribute to record drought during this year. Infection prevalence remained relatively high in low-elevation sites in 2008 and 2009. Neither body condition nor aquatic dependence was a significant predictor of ranavirus prevalence. Overall, our results indicate that life history differences among species play a minor role determining ranavirus prevalence compared to the larger effects of site elevation and yearly fluctuations (likely due to environmental stressors) during sampling years.
Keywordsamphibians lotic pathogen surveillance
We thank R. Brenes, M. Brand, L. Henderson, along with multiple student volunteers from the University of Tennessee Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries and Pellissippi State Community College for field sampling assistance; and M. Niemiller and K. Hamed for assistance with salamander identification. Funds for this research were provided by the U.S. National Park Service (GSMNP) and the University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture. We thank the Barrett lab, H. Rothbone, D. Steen, S. Sterrett, and E. Ridell for comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.
- Brunner JL, Barnett KE, Gosier CJ, McNulty SA, Rubbo MJ, Kolozsvary MB (2011) Ranavirus infection die-offs of vernal pool amphibians in New York, USA. Herpetological Review 42:76–79.Google Scholar
- Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference. A practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd ed., New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
- Crother BI (editor) (2012) Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with Comments Regarding Confidence in our Understanding, 7th ed., SSAR Circular # 39Google Scholar
- Davic RD, Welsh HH, Jr (2004) On the ecological roles of salamanders. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 35:404–434.Google Scholar
- Feder ME (1983) Integrating the ecology and physiology of plethodontid salamanders. Herpetologica 39:291‒310.Google Scholar
- Gray MJ, Miller DL, Hoverman JT (2009b) First report of Ranavirus infecting lungless salamanders. Herpetological Review 40:316–319.Google Scholar
- Gray MJ, Miller DL (2013) The rise of ranavirus: an emerging pathogen threatens ectothermic vertebrates. Wildlife Professional 7:51-55Google Scholar
- Petranka JW (1998) Salamanders of the United States and Canada, Washington, DC and London, UK: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2013) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
- Tilley SG, Huheey JE (2001) Reptiles and Amphibians of the Smokies, Gatlinburg, TN: Great Smoky Mountains Natural History Association.Google Scholar
- Whitman RL, Gochee AV, Dustman WA, Kennedy KJ (1995) Use of coliform bacteria in assessing human sewage contamination. Natural Areas Journal 15:227‒233.Google Scholar