Diseases threaten corals globally, but 40 years on their causes remain mostly unknown. We hypothesize that inconsistent application of a complete diagnostic approach to coral disease has contributed to this slow progress. We quantified methods used to investigate coral disease in 492 papers published between 1965 and 2013. Field surveys were used in 65% of the papers, followed by biodetection (43%), laboratory trials (20%), microscopic pathology (21%), and field trials (9%). Of the microscopic pathology efforts, 57% involved standard histopathology at the light microscopic level (12% of the total investigations), with the remainder dedicated to electron or fluorescence microscopy. Most (74%) biodetection efforts focused on culture or molecular characterization of bacteria or fungi from corals. Molecular and immunological tools have been used to incriminate infectious agents (mainly bacteria) as the cause of coral diseases without relating the agent to specific changes in cell and tissue pathology. Of 19 papers that declared an infectious agent as a cause of disease in corals, only one (5%) used microscopic pathology, and none fulfilled all of the criteria required to satisfy Koch’s postulates as applied to animal diseases currently. Vertebrate diseases of skin and mucosal surfaces present challenges similar to corals when trying to identify a pathogen from a vast array of environmental microbes, and diagnostic approaches regularly used in these cases might provide a model for investigating coral diseases. We hope this review will encourage specialists of disease in domestic animals, wildlife, fish, shellfish, and humans to contribute to the emerging field of coral disease.
Keywordscoral disease pathology diagnostics epizootiology
We thank Sylvia Galloway, Jo-Ann Leong, Gareth Williams, and Cheryl Woodley for their critical review on earlier versions of this paper. Thanks to Kevin Brinck and Robin Russell for guidance on statistical analyses. Mention of products and trade names does not imply endorsement by the US Government.
- Crang RFE, and Klomparens KL (1988). Artifacts in biological electron microscopy. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
- De’ath G, and Fabricius KE (2001). Biodiversity on the Great Barrier Reef: Large scale patterns and turbidity-related local loss of soft coral taxa. Pages 127-144 in E. Wolanski, editor. Oceanographic processes of coral reefs. Physical and biological links in the Great Barrier Reef. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
- Galloway SB, Work TM, Bochsler VS, Harley RA, Kramarsky-Winters E, Peters EC, et al. (2006). Coral disease and health workshop: Coral histopathology II. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Springs.Google Scholar
- Hyman LH (1940). The invertebrates: Protozoa through Ctenophora. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
- Littman RA, Bourne DG, and Willis BL (2010). Responses of coral-associated bacterial communities to heat stress differ with Symbiodinium type on the same coral host (pages 1978–1990). Microbial Ecology 19:1978-1990.Google Scholar
- Martin SW, Meek AH, and Willerberg P (1987). Veterinary epidemiology, principles and methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames.Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.Google Scholar
- Raymundo L, Work T, Bruckner A, and Willis B (2008). A decision tree for describing coral lesions in the field. Pages 17-32 in L. Raymundo, C. Couch, and C. Harvell, editors. A coral disease handbook: Guidelines for assessment, monitoring, and management. Coral Reef Targeted Research and Capacity Building For Management Program, St. Lucia.Google Scholar
- van Oppen MJH, Baker AC, Coffroth MA, Willis BL (2009) Bleaching resistance and the role of algal endosymbionts. In: Coral Bleaching, van Oppen MJH, Lough JM (editors), Berlin: Springer, pp 83–102Google Scholar
- Work TM, Aeby GS (2014) Microbial aggregates within tissues infect a diversity of corals throughout the Indo-Pacific. Marine Ecology Progress Series 500:1–9.Google Scholar