Potential Distribution of Dengue Fever Under Scenarios of Climate Change and Economic Development
- 2k Downloads
Dengue fever is the most important viral vector-borne disease with ~50 million cases per year globally. Previous estimates of the potential effect of global climate change on the distribution of vector-borne disease have not incorporated the effect of socioeconomic factors, which may have biased the results. We describe an empirical model of the current geographic distribution of dengue, based on the independent effects of climate and gross domestic product per capita (GDPpc, a proxy for socioeconomic development). We use the model, along with scenario-based projections of future climate, economic development, and population, to estimate populations at risk of dengue in the year 2050. We find that both climate and GDPpc influence the distribution of dengue. If the global climate changes as projected but GDPpc remained constant, the population at risk of dengue is estimated to increase by about 0.28 billion in 2050. However, if both climate and GDPpc change as projected, we estimate a decrease of 0.12 billion in the population at risk of dengue in 2050. Empirically, the geographic distribution of dengue is strongly dependent on both climatic and socioeconomic variables. Under a scenario of constant GDPpc, global climate change results in a modest but important increase in the global population at risk of dengue. Under scenarios of high GDPpc, this adverse effect of climate change is counteracted by the beneficial effect of socioeconomic development.
Keywordsclimate change dengue global health socio-economics vector-borne disease
- Bouwman AF, Kram T, and Klein Goldewijk K (2006) Integrated Modelling of Global Environmental Change. An Overview of IMAGE 2.4. 500110002, Bilthoven: Netherlands Environmental Assessment AgencyGoogle Scholar
- Hii YL, Rocklov J, Ng N, Tang CS, Pang FY, and Sauerborn R (2009). Climate variability and increase in intensity and magnitude of dengue incidence in Singapore. Global Health Action 2:1–9. doi: 10.3402/gha.v2i0.2036
- Huebener H, Cubasch U, Langematz U, Spangehl T, Niehorster F, Fast I, et al. (2007). Ensemble climate simulations using a fully coupled ocean-troposphere-stratosphere general circulation model. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 365:2089-2101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2007), IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Bonn: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
- Marti O, Braconnot P, Bellier J, Benshila R, Bony S, Brockmann P et al. (2006) The New IPSL Climate System Model: IPSL-CM4, Paris: IPSLGoogle Scholar
- McMichael A (2003). Global climate change and health: an old story writ large. in A. McMichael, D. Campbell-Lendrum, C. Corvalan, K. Ebi, A. Githeko, J. Scheraga, and A. Woodward, editors. Climate Change and Human Health. Risks and responses. WHO, Geneva.Google Scholar
- McMichael A, Campbell-Lendrum DH, Kovats RS, Edwards S, Wilkinson P (2002) Comparative Risk Assessment: Climate Change, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- Nakicenovic N, and Swart R, editors. (2000). Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
- Reiter P (2010). Yellow fever and dengue: a threat to Europe? Eurosurveillance 15:11-17.Google Scholar
- Russell R, Currie B, Lindsay M, Mackenzie J, Ritchie S, and Whelan P (2009). Dengue and climate change in Australia: predictions for the future should incorporate knowledge from the past. Medical Journal of Australia 5:265-268.Google Scholar
- Van Kleef E, Bambrick H, Hales S (2010) Systematic review of the geographic distribution of dengue fever and the potential influence of global climate change. TropIKA.net, Geneve, 2010. Available from http://journal.tropika.net/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2078-86062010005000001&lng=en&nrm=iso. Accessed 31 Dec 2012.
- WHO (2009) Dengue: Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention and Control, Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar