EcoHealth

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 491–503 | Cite as

Development of Transdisciplinarity Among Students Placed with a Sustainability for Health Research Project

Original Contribution

Abstract

Transdisciplinary education on sustainability for health has been primarily developed in high-income countries, yet the need in countries with limited research and human resource investments remains urgent. Little empiric documentation of the facilitators and barriers to transdisciplinary learning in such countries has been described. We assessed transdisciplinary learning among students of different disciplines collaborating with an Ecuadorian sustainability for health research project. Six undergraduate students from four different disciplinary backgrounds were incorporated through work–study agreements with provincial university academic supervisors. Learning was fostered and monitored through participant observations by a field supervisor. Students’ learning was evaluated through subsequent in-depth interviews and visualization methods. Academic supervisor key informant and co-investigator observations aided triangulation. Qualitative data were analyzed using indicators of transdisciplinary thinking. Principal factors facilitating transdisciplinary learning were interaction with social actors, the integration of work with other disciplines, the use of alternative research techniques and methods, and the constant support of the field supervisor. Inhibiting factors included the existence of rigid academic rules, lack of training of the academic supervisors in diverse research methods, and social pressures to implement unidisciplinary foci. At the end of their link with the project, students had developed both cognitive outcomes and attitudinal values relevant to sustainable development for health. In countries with limited investments in research and human resources development, transdisciplinary approaches with social actors and engaged researchers can sensitize new professionals training in traditional academic contexts to the ecological–social–health problems faced by poor majorities and encourage their subsequent work on sustainability for human health.

Keywords

transdisciplinary learning developing countries sustainability higher education qualitative methods action research 

References

  1. Adomsset M, Godemann J, Michelsen G (2007) Transferability of approaches to sustainable development at universities as a challenge. International Journal of Sustainability and Higher Education 8:385–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albrecht G, Higginbotham N, Cashman P, Flint K (2004) Evolution of transdisciplinarity and ecosystem health at the University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. EcoHealth 1(Suppl 1):23–29Google Scholar
  3. Almeida N (2005) Transdisciplinaridade e o paradigma pós-disciplinar na saúde. Saúde e Sociedade 14:30–50Google Scholar
  4. Alvarenga T, Sommerman A, Souza Alvarez A (2005) Congressos Internacionais sobre transdisciplinaridade: reflexções sobre emergencias e convergencias de ideias e ideais na direção de uma nova ciencia moderna. Saúde e Sociedade 14:9–29Google Scholar
  5. Battel-Mink B, Kastenholz H (2005) Transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: diffusion conditions of an institutional innovation. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 12:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bovenschulte M (2007) Towards a proposal of estimation of the “innovating attitude” in the society. Espacios 28:41–56Google Scholar
  7. Choi B, Pak A (2006) Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine 29:351–363Google Scholar
  8. Cole DC, Crissman C, Orozco AF (2006) Canada’s International Development Research Centre’s Eco-Health projects with Latin Americans: origins, development and challenges. Canadian Journal of Public Health 97:I8–I14Google Scholar
  9. Creswell JW, Miller DL (2000) Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice 39:124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Koning K, Martin M (editors) (1996) Participatory Research in Health: Issues and Experiences, chapter 5, Johannesburg, South Africa: National Progressive Primary Health Care Network, pp 50–61Google Scholar
  11. Gibbs P, Costley C (2006) Work based learning; discipline, field or discursive space or what? Research in Post-Compulsory Education 11:341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hadorn H, Bradley D, Pohl C, Rist S, Wiesmann U (2006) Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological Economics 60:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanson L (2008) Global citizenship, global health and the internationalization of the curriculum, a study of transformative potential. Journal of Studies in International Education. doi:10.1177/1028315308323207 [online August 22, 2008]
  14. Howard J (2004) Challenges facing the adoption of ecosystem health core component in professional curricula. EcoHealth 1(00):16–22Google Scholar
  15. Lambert R, Monnier-Barbarino P (2005) Transdisciplinarity training in reproductive health through online multidisciplinarity problem solving: a proof of concept. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 123:82–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lebel J (2003) Health and Ecosystem Approach, Ottawa, ON, Canada: International Development Research Centre, pp 1–24. Available at http://www.idrc.ca/ecohealth
  17. Loisel P, Cote P, Durand MJ, Franche RL, Sullivan MJL, Cole DC, et al. (2005) Training the next generation of researchers in work disability prevention: the Canadian Work Disability Prevention CIHR Strategic Training Program. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 15:273–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Manen M (2001) Transdisciplinarity and the new production of knowledge. Qualitative Health Research 11:850–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meyer P, Costa I, Vasconcelos V (2006) The social sciences and physical therapy: a possible nexus. História, Ciencias, Saúde—Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro 13:877–890Google Scholar
  20. Moore J (2005) Seven recommendations for creating sustainability education at the university level. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 6:326–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Muhar A, Vilsmaier U, Glanzer M, Freyer B (2006) Initiating transdisciplinarity in academic case study teaching. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 7:293–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nash JM, Collins BN, Loughlin SE, Solbring M, Harvey R, Krishnan-Sarin S, et al. (2003) Training the transdisciplinary scientist: a general framework applied to tobacco use behavior. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 5:S41–S53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Orozco F, Cole DC (2006) Plataformas Multidisiciplinarias en la Investigación Acción de Salud y Agricultura. Abstract presented at the “11vo Congreso Mundial de Salud Pública y 8vo Congreso Brasilero de Salud Colectiva,” Río de Janeiro, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  24. Paige K, Lloyd D, Charters M (2008) Moving towards transdisciplinarity: an ecological sustainable focus for science and mathematics pre-service education in the primary-middle years. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 36:19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Patrick P (2005) Transdisciplinariedade e antropoformação: sua importancia nas pesquisas em saúde. Saúde e Sociedade 14:72–92Google Scholar
  26. Patton M (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd ed, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, part III, pp 369–436Google Scholar
  27. Peréz Jimenez C (2006) ¿Tecnologización o democratización de la educación? Entre debates, encrucijadas y críticas desde el enfoque de ciencia, tecnología y sociedad. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 12:93–109Google Scholar
  28. Posch A, Steiner G (2006) Integrating research and teaching on innovation for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 7:276–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prüss-Üstün A (2006) Preventing Disease through Healthy Environments: Towards an Estimate of the Environmental Burden of Disease. World Health Organization (WHO). Available at http://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/publications/preventingdisease/en/index.html [accessed September 26, 2008]
  30. Rodriguez Trujillo N (2004) Retos de la formación de docentes en Venezuela. Revista de Pedagogía 25:3–12Google Scholar
  31. Scholz R, Mieg HA, Oswald JE (2000) Transdisciplinarity in ground water management towards mutual learning of science and society. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 123:477–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scholz R, Lang D, Wiek A, Walter A, Stauffacher M (2006) Transdisciplinarity case studies as means of sustainability learning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 7:226–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Secretaria Nacional de Ciencias y Tecnología (SENACYT), Republic del Ecuador (2005) Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología. Available at http://www.senacyt.gov.ec/files/ricyt.xls [accessed September 26, 2008]
  34. Sistema Integral de Seguimiento y Evaluacion (SISE) (2006) Indicadores del Sistema Español de Ciencia y Tecnología. Available: http://www.micinn.es/ciencia/jsp/plantilla.jsp?id=23&area=estadisticas [accessed September 26, 2008]
  35. Stokols D, Fuqua J, Gress J, Harvey R, Phillips K, Baezconde-Garbanati L, et al. (2003) Evaluating transdisciplinarity science. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 5:S21–S39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. White F (2002) Capacity-building for health research in developing countries: a manager’s approach. Revista Panamerica de Salud Pública/Pan American Journal of Public Health 12:165–172Google Scholar
  37. Wilcox B, Kasuya R (2004) Integrating ecohealth into a medical school curriculum: a vision of the future at the University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine. EcoHealth 1:34–42Google Scholar
  38. Winberg C (2006) Uni-disciplinary knowledge production: development driven higher education in South Africa. Higher Education 51:159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. World Health Organization (WHO) (2005) The WHO Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification: 2004, Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 57 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Ecology and Health 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de Saúde ColetivaUniversidade Federal da BahiaSalvadorBrazil
  2. 2.SalvadorBrazil
  3. 3.Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Agriculture and Health DivisionInternational Potato CenterLimaPeru

Personalised recommendations