Hormetic Effects of Heavy Metals in Aquatic Snails: Is a Little Bit of Pollution Good?
Hormesis is the term to describe a stimulatory effects associated with a low dose of a potentially toxic substance or stress. We had anecdotal evidence of hormetic effects in some of our previous experiments concerning the influence of heavy metals on aquatic snail growth and recruitment. We therefore repeated a version of an earlier experiment but this time we expanded our low-dose treatments and increased our sample size. We also explored if metals had a hormetic effect on algae periphyton. We raised snails in outdoor mini-ecosystems containing lead, zinc, and cadmium-contaminated soil from an Environmental Protection Agency Superfund site in the Silver Valley of northern Idaho. The snails came from two sites. One population (Physella columbiana) has evolved for 120 years in the presence of heavy metals and one (Lymnaea palustris) has not. We found that P. columbiana exhibited hormesis with snails exposed to small amounts of metals exhibiting more reproduction and growth than snails not exposed to metals. Naturally occurring Oscillatoria algae also exhibited a hormetic effect of heavy metals but L. palustris did not display hormesis. Large doses negatively impacted all three species. Overall the levels of cadmium, lead, and zinc measured in the tissues of the snails were inversely correlated to the number of snails recruited into the tub populations. Only in comparisons of the lowest metal treatment to the control treatment is a positive effect detected. Indirect effects on competing species of snails, periphyton, and also fishermen, may be less favorable.
Keywordshormesis metals lead recruitment snail
We thank J. Haydock, B. Swanson, and an anonymous reviewer for extremely helpful comments. This study was partially funded by a grant from the Merck Corporation to H. Lefcort.
- Axelrod D, Burns K, Davis D, von Larebeke N (2004) “Hormesis”–an inappropriate extrapolation from the specific to the universal. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 10:335–339Google Scholar
- Calabrese EJ, Baldwin LA, Holland CD (1999) Hormesis: a highly generalizable and reproducible phenomenon with important implications for risk assessment. Risk Analyses 19:261–281Google Scholar
- Correia AD, Costa FO, Neuparth T, Diniz ME, Costa MH (2001) Sub-lethal effects of copper-spiked sediments on the marine amphipod Gammarus locusta: evidence of hormesis? Ecotoxicology and Environmental Restoration 4:32–38Google Scholar
- Cypser JR, Johnson TE (2002) Multiple stressors in Caenorhabditis elegans induce stress hormesis and extended longevity. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 57:B109–B114Google Scholar
- Deleebeeck NME, De Schamphelaere KAC, Janssen CR (2004) The effect of pH on the toxicity of Ni to the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. European Chemical Bureau. Available: http://www.ecb.jrc.it/classlab/2695a67_IND_nickel.pdf
- Hayes DP (2007) Nutritional hormesis. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 61:147–159Google Scholar
- Hunter RD (1975) Growth, fecundity, and bioenergetics in three populations of Lymnaea palustris in upstate New York. Ecology 56:50–63Google Scholar
- Idaho Division of Health (2003) Evaluation of Metals in Bullhead, Bass, and Kokanee from Lake Coeur D’Alene, Coeur D’Alene, ID: Idaho Division of Health PublicationGoogle Scholar
- Lee M, Cryer B, Feldman M (1994) Dose effects of aspirin on gastric prostaglandins and stomach mucosal injury. Annals of Internal Medicine 120:184–189Google Scholar
- Odendaal JP, Reinecke AJ (2001) Effect of metal mixtures (Cd and Zn) on body weight in terrestrial isopods. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 46:377–384Google Scholar
- Pellegrini O, Davenas E, Morin L, Tsangaris GT, Benveniste J, Manuel Y, et al. (1994) Modulation of stress proteins by Cd2+ in a human T cell line. European Journal of Pharmacology 270:221–228Google Scholar
- Pollycove M, Feinendegen LE (2001) Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: detriment versus hormesis. Part 2. Dose responses of organisms. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 42:32N–36NGoogle Scholar