Advertisement

EcoHealth

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 515–531 | Cite as

Towards Understanding the Health Vulnerability of Indigenous Peoples Living in Voluntary Isolation in the Amazon Rainforest: Experiences from the Kugapakori Nahua Reserve, Peru

  • Dora A. Napolitano
Special Feature: Indigenous Perspectives Original Contribution

Abstract

The remote headwater areas of the Amazon rainforest are home to many Indigenous groups who prefer not to encounter and establish relationships with outsiders. These people have not been exposed to many everyday, infectious, Old World diseases and are therefore particularly susceptible to them, with extremely high morbidity and mortality rates. Recent Peruvian governments have encouraged the large-scale exploitation of timber, gas, and petrol in the Amazon. These economic interests have greatly increased pressure on previously remote areas, many of which are home to Indigenous peoples in voluntary isolation. The Nahua and Nanti established direct relations with outsiders in the last 20 years and have experienced major changes in health status, social disruption, and bereavement as a consequence. The description of some of their epidemics highlights these populations’ vulnerability to introduced diseases. Understood as the result of both “internal” and “external” factors, this vulnerability is a combination of their high susceptibility and of social changes resulting from increased resource pressure on their lands. The experiences of the peoples in the Kugapakori Nahua Reserve demonstrate the effects that resource extraction activities (both surface and subsoil) can have on local populations, not only when conducted in their lands (as in the case of the Nahua) but also when they take place downstream of their territories (as in the case of the Nanti). Because their susceptibility cannot be significantly altered immediately or without affecting their rights, the responsibility lies with local and national governments to limit exploitation on their lands. Not to do so constitutes a violation of isolated peoples’ rights to life and health.

Keywords

voluntary isolation Amazon extractive industry vulnerability rainforest Indigenous health Peru 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work presented here is the result of six years of work in and around the Kugapakori Nahua Reserve, carried out, as part of Shinai projects, by Aliya Ryan, Conrad Feather, Gregor MacLennan, and the author. The field work with the Camisea Nanti was performed by Lev Michael and Christina Beier and with the Paquiría Machiguenga by Kacper Swierk. An informal “Comité de la Reserva” was formed to support the field component of this work and was made up of Shinai, Grupo de Trabajo Racimos de Ungurahui, Asociación Peruana Pro Derechos Humanos (APRODEH), Instituto del Bien Común (IBC), and Consejo Machiguenga del Río Urubamba (COMARU). The Reserve Project (2002-2004) was funded by the Garfield Foundation, IUCN-NC, Nouvelle Planète, Oxfam America, and Rainforest Foundation US. We also thank the Garfield Foundation and Rainforest Foundation UK for support during 2006. Thanks also due to three anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. AIDESEP (2007) Comunicado: AIDESEP rechaza subasta de lotes petroleros que afectarán a pueblos aislados [Press release: AIDESEP rejects auction of petrol concessions that will affect isolated peoples], February 5, 2007. Available at http://www.servindi.org [accessed February 14, 2007]
  2. Beier C (2007) Cabeceras Aid Project Field ReportGoogle Scholar
  3. Beier C, Michael L (2004) Una breve historia del pueblo Nanti [A brief history of the Nanti people]. Draft document Cabeceras Aid Project – ShinaiGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkes F (2007) Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking. Natural Hazards 41:283–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brackelaire V (2006) Situación de los últimos pueblos indígenas aislados en América latina (Bolivia, Brasil, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Perú, Venezuela): Diagnóstico regional para facilitar estrategias de protección [Situation of the last isolated Indigenous peoples in Latin America (Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, Venezuela): Regional evaluation to facilitate protection strategies]. Report prepared after first International Meeting on Isolated PeoplesGoogle Scholar
  6. Camisea Project (2007) Available at http://www.camisea.com.pe/project.asp [accessed February 14, 2007]
  7. Carbajal JL (2002) Plan de contingencia antropológico para poblaciones en contacto inicial o en aislamiento [Anthropological contingency plan for populations in initial contact o in isolation]. Pluspetrol, LimaGoogle Scholar
  8. CENSI (2006) Norma técnica de prevención, contingencia y mitigación de riesgos a la salud en escenarios con presencia de indígenas en aislamiento y en contacto reciente [Technical norm for prevention, contingency and mitigation of health risks in situations including the presence of isolated and recently contacted Indigenous peoples]. Instituto Nacional de Salud, working document, June 2006Google Scholar
  9. Chambers R (1989) Editorial introduction: Vulnerability, coping and policy. IDS Bulletin 20(2):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clousdey T (1988) La búsqueda de petróleo de la Shell y sus efectos sobre los nativos en la región del Bajo Urubamba en la selva peruana [Shell’s search for petrol and its effects on the natives of the Lower Urubamba region in the Peruvian rainforest]. Amazonía Peruana VII(15):119–127Google Scholar
  11. Dagget J (1991) Dilemas que se presentan en los primeros contactos con un grupo étnico aislado [Dilemmas presented during the first contacts with an isolated ethnic group]. Amazonía Peruan, XI(20):49–64Google Scholar
  12. Defensoría del Pueblo (2006) Informe No. 101: Pueblos indígenas en situación de aislamiento voluntario y contacto inicial [Report No. 101: Indigenous people in voluntary isolation or initial contact]. Defensoría del Pueblo, LimaGoogle Scholar
  13. Delor F, Hubert M (2000) Revisiting the concept of ‘vulnerability’. Social Science and Medicine 50:1557–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DGE (2006) Análisis de situación de salud del pueblo Machiguenga [Analysis of the health situation of the Machiguenga people]. Dirección General de Epidemiología, Ministerio de Salud, LimaGoogle Scholar
  15. Dobyns HF (1993) Disease transfer at contact. Annual Review of Anthropology 22:273–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dricot-D’Ans C, Dricot JM (1978) Influence de l’acculturation sur la situation nutritionnelle en Amazonie péruvienne [Influence of acculturation on nutritional status in the Peruvian Amazon]. Annales de la Société belge de médecine tropicale 58:39–48Google Scholar
  17. Eisenberg J, Cevallos W, Ponce K, Levy K, Bates SJ, Scott J, et al. (2006) Environmental change and infectious disease: how new roads affect the transmission of diarrheal pathogens in rural Ecuador. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 103(51):19460–10465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Environmental Defense (2003) Environmental Defense commends historic “No” vote on Camisea Project. Available at http://www.environmentaldefense.org [accessed February 14, 2007]
  19. Feather CJ (2001) Madera, Mestizos and Missionaries: The contested meanings of logging in South East Peru, unpublished B.A. Thesis, Cambridge UniversityGoogle Scholar
  20. Feather CJ (2005) Enfrentamiento entre miembros del pueblo Nahua y pueblos aislados en el río Manu en agosto 2005 [Conflicts between members of the Nahua people and isolated peoples on the Many river in August 2005]. Informe para AIDESEP, ShinaiGoogle Scholar
  21. Furgal C, Seguin J (2006) Climate change, health and vulnerability in Canadian Northern Aboriginal Communities. Environmental Health Perspectives 114:1964–1970Google Scholar
  22. Hill K, Kaplan H (1989) Population and dry season subsistence strategies of the recently contacted Yora of Peru. National Geographic Research 5(3):317–334Google Scholar
  23. Hill K, Hurtado M (1996) Ache Life History: the Ecology and Demography of a Foraging People, New York: Aldine de GruyterGoogle Scholar
  24. Huertas Castillo B (2002) Los pueblos indígenas en aislamiento: su lucha por la sobrevivencia y la libertad [Isolated Indigenous people: their struggle for survival and liberty]. IWGIA, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  25. Hurtado M, Hill K, Kaplan H, Lancaster J (2001) The epidemiology of infectious diseases among South American Indians: a call for ethical research guidelines. Current Anthropology 42(3):425–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hurtado MA, Hill KR, Rosenblatt W, Bender J, Scharmen T (2003) Longitudinal study of tuberculosis outcomes among immunologically naive Aché Natives of Paraguay. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 121:134–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hurtado MA, Lambourne CA, James P, Hill K, Cheman K, Baca K (2005) Human rights, biomedical science, and infectious diseases among South American Indigenous groups. Annual Review of Anthropology 34:639–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. IADB Peru (2003) Environmental and social impact report, Camisea Project, PE-0222, June 2003Google Scholar
  29. INDEPA (2006) Respecto al fallecimiento de nativos equipo técnico de INDEPA evaluó comunidades nativas del Bajo Urubamba [With regard to the death of natives, INDEPA technical team evaluated native communities in Lower Urubamba], Press release December 26, 2006Google Scholar
  30. Kaplan JE, Larrick JW, Yost J, Farrell L, Greenberg HB, Herrman KL, et al. (1980) Infectious disease patterns in the Waorani, an isolated Amerindian population. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 29(2):298–312Google Scholar
  31. La República (2006) Exceso de masato mató a los nativos [Excessive consumption of masato killed natives], December 27, 2006Google Scholar
  32. Michael LD, Beier C (2003) Poblaciones indígenas en aislamiento voluntario en la región del Alto Purús [Indigenous populations in voluntary isolation in the region of the Upper Purús] in Alto Purús: Biodiversidad, Conservación y Manejo [Upper Purús: Biodiversity, Conservation and Management], Leite Pitman MRP, Pitman NCA, Alvarez PC (editors), Lima: Center for Tropical Conservation and INRENAGoogle Scholar
  33. Montag R (1998) A tale of Pudicho’s people: Cashinahua narratives of European contact in the 20th century, Ph.D. dissertation, Albany State University of New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Montenegro RA, Stephens C (2006) Indigenous health in Latin America and the Caribbean. Lancet 367:1859–1869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Myers TP (1988) El efecto de las pestes sobre las poblaciones de la Amazonía alta [The effect of the epidemics on the populations of the Upper Amazon]. Amazonía Peruana VIII(15):61–81Google Scholar
  36. Napolitano DA, Ryan ASS (2007) The dilemma of contact: voluntary isolation and the impacts of gas exploitation on health and rights in the Kugapakori Nahua Reserve, Peruvian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters 2(October–December 2007):045005. http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1748-9326/2/4/045005/erl7_4_045005.html
  37. Neel JV, Centerwall WR, Chagnon NA, Casey HL (1970) Notes on the effect of measles and measles vaccine in a virgin-soil population of South American Indians. American Journal of Epidemiology 91:418–429Google Scholar
  38. OGE (2003) Pueblos en situación de extrema vulnerabilidad: El caso de los Nanti de la Reserva territorial Kugapakori Nahua, Río Camisea, Cusco [Peoples in extreme vulnerability: the case of the Nanti of the Kugapakori Nahua Territorial Reserve, Camisea River, Cusco]. Oficina General de Epidemiología, Ministerio de Salud, LimaGoogle Scholar
  39. Rullán Lolom AJ (1985) Informe sobre la situación de salud en los grupos nativos asentados en el Parque Nacional del Manu, Departamento de Madre de Dios [Report on the health situation of the native groups settled in Manu National Park, Department of Madre de Dios], Shintuya, December 31, 1985 [reproduced in SLOPA 1985]Google Scholar
  40. Shepard GH (1999) Pharmacognosy and the Senses in Two Amazonian Societies, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  41. Shinai (2004) Aquí vivimos bien: Kamyeti notimaigzi aka – Territorio y uso de recursos de los pueblos indígenas de la Reserva Kugapakori Nahua [We live well here – Territory and resource use of the Indigenous peoples of the Kugapakori Nahua Reserve]. Lima: ShinaiGoogle Scholar
  42. Shinai (2007) “Caerse del bosque”: Una propuesta para abordar mejor los conceptos de “aislamiento” y “alta vulnerabilidad” para los pueblos indígenas [“To fall out of the forest”: A proposal to better understand the concepts of “isolation” and “high vulnerability” for Indigenous peoples]. Working documentGoogle Scholar
  43. Shinai Serjali (2003) El territorio nahua: informe sobre el uso de recursos y territorio del pueblo indígena nahua, ríos Mishagua y Serjali, sudeste del Perú [Nahua territory: report on the Nahua Indigenous people’s use of resources and territory, Mishagua and Serjali rivers, SE Peru]. Lima: ShinaiGoogle Scholar
  44. SLOPA (1980-1989) Informativo de las comunidades [Information sheet for communities]. Misión El Rosario – SepahuaGoogle Scholar
  45. Strongin JD (1982) Machiguenga, Medicine and Missionaries: the Introduction of Western Health Aids among a Native Population of South East Peru. Ph.D. Thesis, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Swierk K (2004) El territorio de los Matsigenka Paquirianos: Informe sobre el uso de recursos y el territorio de un grupo regional / territorial de la etnia Matsigenka (cuencas del Paquiría y de unos ríos adyacentes, Sur de la Amazonía peruana) [The territory of the Paquiría Matsigenka: Report on the use of resources and territory by a regional/territorial group of the Matsigenka (Paquiría watershed and adjacent rivers, southern Peruvian Amazon)]. Lima: ShinaiGoogle Scholar
  47. Tello Abanto R (2002) Informe N° 039-2002/RTA/PRO-MANU, Informe sobre avistamientos de indígenas aislados y percepciones locales en la zona circundante a la comunidad nativa de Tayakome [Report of sightings of isolated indigenous people and local perceptions in the area surrounding the native community of Tayakomi]. Report addressed to the codirection of Promanu, November 11, 2002Google Scholar
  48. Townsley G (1989) Ideas and patterns of change in Yaminahua Society, Ph.D. Thesis, Cambridge UniversityGoogle Scholar
  49. UN General Assembly (2007) United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, 61st Session, Agenda item 68, Report of the Human Rights Council, A/61/L.67, September 7, 2007Google Scholar
  50. Wahl L (1990) El Manu, los Nahua y Sepahua frente a la madera: ideología y producción [The Manu, the Nahua and Sepahua facing the logging trade: ideology and production]. Perú Indígena 12(28):145–170Google Scholar
  51. Zarzar A (1987) Radiografía de un contacto: los nahua y la sociedad nacional [X-ray of a contact: the Nahua and national society]. Amazonía Peruana 8(14):91–113Google Scholar
  52. Zarzar A (2000) Tras las huellas de un antiguo presente: la problemática de los pueblos amazónicos en aislamiento y contacto inicial [In the tracks of an ancient present: the situation of Amazonian peoples in isolation and initial contact]. Defensoría del Pueblo, LimaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ecohealth Journal Consortium 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ShinaiLimaPeru

Personalised recommendations